Queen Anne's Revenge 1710 by shipmodel - FINISHED - 1/36 scale

[shipmodel]

Hi all -

 

Two days of carving and the first figurehead is rounding into shape.  Here is how I am going about it. 

 

I do almost all of my carving with a rotary tool and a series of ever smaller burrs and bitts.  Here they are for the first stage of the carving.  It includes a 1/4" diameter sanding sleeve for the Dremel plus a set of Disston burrs. Over the years I have added to the set when I found other shapes that could be useful. 

 

 

Here are the ones I use most often.  The sanding sleeve is at the top.  From left to right we have a straight bit with a rounded tip; a straight bit with a square tip; a reverse cone; and in the Dremel is a sharp cornered reverse rounded cone.  This last one is very useful for 'drawing' thin lines onto the wood that serve as landmarks for deeper carving with the other bitts.

 

 

The first carving was done with the sanding sleeve to round off the square corners and planes left by the band saw, and to get the basic side to side shape.

 

 

Now the arms are defined, which will fair into the basic shape of the lower body.  The mane is rounded, which will frame the shape of the face.

 

 

The tail was pencilled in on both sides and defined, which then set the depth of the lower body.  The crown was detailed, which adjusts the top of the mane.  The mane was given its initial texture, which then required reducing the height of the shoulder, etc. etc.  This is how I carve, with each step or detail that is worked on leading to a further defining of the adjacent detail. 

 

 

So here is the current look of the first figurehead.  The head is still too broad, but that is OK, as it gives me the depth of material that can be carved away for the final detailing of the face.

 

  

 

Next time, the final detailing.

 

Be well

 

Dan

Edited November 3, 2013 by shipmodel

[michael mott]

Dan it is great to see the incremental development of the figurehead.

 

Michael

Edited November 3, 2013 by michael mott

[mtaylor]

Dan,

 

Quite a nice tutorial...  you make it look easy. 

[Erebus and Terror]

Interesting project for an interesting institution. I'm following and enjoying it very much!

[dvm27]

Both boats look terrific, Dan. Also love the Gothborg full sized figurehead. Great start on your figurehead.

[dgbot]

Looking good Dan.

David B

[shipmodel]

Hello again -

 

Just back from the doctor, who says that a 'trigger finger' problem that I am having with my right thumb is related to the repetitive nature of the carving work.  He told me to lay off for a while, and gave me a cortisone shot into the base of the thumb.  Ouch !    And then it didn't work!  I don't have much more to do on the first figurehead, so I am going to finish it in easy stages, then work on some larger pieces before going back to the second lion.

 

Here is a short report on where I am now -

 

This next phase of the carving is mostly a process of refining the shapes that were defined last time.  For this I mostly use a series of diamond abrasive burrs of various shapes.  Here is the set, purchased from Micro-Mark some time ago when Chinese tool makers hadn't started taking short cuts with quality.  They have held up very well for more than a decade.  The long cone in the Dremel is very useful.  I use the point for lining out and small details, while the larger diameter of the base of the burr smooths and shapes larger surfaces.

 

 

The carving process with these burrs is the same as for the larger bitts - I first define the edges and planes, then refine them by rounding the corners and adjusting the angles of the planes.  Raised body parts like the tail and upper arm are given some dimensionality by undercutting them slightly to create a shadow line.  

 

All of the carving is all done by eye at this stage - the Michelangelo method - I just remove whatever doesn't look like the image in my head.  Here are a series of shots with the work rotating starboard to port.

 

 

The major issue right now is the shape of the head.  It is still too broad.  In some photos it looks more like a lizard than a lion.  You can see that quite clearly in the first enlarged photo below.  This was taken with the macro setting on the camera, and some of the problem is exaggerated, but you can see what I mean.  In the lower photo I used Photoshop to narrow the image about 15%, and now it looks much more leonine.  I will carve it down to get that general shape.

 

 

If you haven't figured it out, the teeth are created by simply drilling a series of small holes which define the negative space between the teeth.  I may use a small triangular file to refine them, or just leave them as is, since they are all but invisible uness a camera is used to magnify them. 

 

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

 

Dan

[michael mott]

Dan the thumb stuff doesn't sound very pleasant. the lion is looking much more interesting, I agree with you about the narrowing of the head, it looks much better, I would be inclined to make it even a smidgen narrower perhaps 16 or 16.5% spitting hairs I know. Ill just quietly go back to my corner now. your carving is better than any I have done.

 

Michael

[BareHook]

Amazing carving! If I may toss in a comment, I dont think overall narrowing of the head is required, but more around the cheeks and mouth to make the jaw portion more narrow and protruding. Of course, I cannot even imagine ever attempting to carve such a piece and it is already an amazing piece of art.

Ken

[shipmodel]

Thanks for all the nice compliments. 

 

Michael -  I will trade some of my carving skills for your metalworking expertise.  I just finished reading your log of the Bristol cutter and was blown away. 

 

Ken -  yes, the jaw is the major problem, but the width of the eye sockets also seemed too broad.  Here is the face after narrowing.  The lion is coming along nicely, but has a ways to go.  If my artistic skills are up to it, I want to get a ferocious expression, but that may be hoping for too much. 

 

 

After putting the lion to bed for a while, the next independent pieces that I turned to were the mast tops.  By 1710 in France they were circular but without the earlier raised rim.  They are built with the usual overlapping plank construction, a flat rim and radial cleats.  Here are Budriot’s plans, which are almost identical to Lees’ and Marquhardt’s.  This is the main top, but the fore is identical, other than being scaled down just a fraction.  The mizzen top is smaller, but the construction method for all three is identical.

 

 

To build them, the first piece to be made was the square filler piece.  It is just a piece of 1/8” thick scrap, sized to the lubber’s hole on the plans.  The cryptic symbol on this one is left over from its use as a jig for a previous model.  I cut this carefully on the Preac, as it will guide the rest of the construction.

 

 

The planks are 1mm thick birch, cut to width and long enough to span the diameter of the top.  On the real ship they would have been cut thick then carved down to make the lap joints, leaving a raised portion in the center.  Instead, I took a piece of the planking and cut sections the length of one side of the filler guide.  These were then glued to the center of the planks with the edges matched up.  When the glue was dry one edge was colored with a black marker.  A completed one is just above the filler guide piece.

 

The cleats in the lower left are mass produced since the fore and main tops take 16 each and the mizzen top takes 12.  I cut a rectangle of 1mm cherry sheet with the grain going in the short dimension.  Then I glued another strip on top of one edge with an overhang equal to the width of the rim with the grain also running in the short direction.  Now I could part off 1/16” wide cleats with a narrow blade in the table saw until I ran out of material. The cleats are left raw at this point and will be shaped and tapered later.

 

To start the platform construction, four of the lap planks are positioned around the filler guide.  Two of them (top/bottom) have the thick section turned up and the other two (left/right) have the section facing down.  They are glued at their overlaps and clamped tightly around the filler guide.

 

 

When they are solid it is easy to lay in the other down facing planks and glue them to the underneath planks and to each other.  After the clamps are removed the platform was flipped over and the remaining planks were glued across the first sets of planks.

 

 

The center of the filler piece was located and the outer perimeter of the top was drawn with a compass.  This was cut close on the band saw and left rough, to be taken down to the line on a disc sander after the rim is installed.

 

With the compass still set for the perimeter size, an arc was drawn on a rectangle of the cherry sheet, this time with the grain running the long way.  The compass was closed the width of the rim and a second curve was drawn inside the first but with the same center.  Three more pieces of cherry were stacked under the first and glued together at the upper corners and lower center only, not where the rim pieces will come from.

 

 

The inside curve was cut on the band saw then smoothed to the line with a sanding drum in the drill press.  The outer curve was cut large, to be sanded down after installation on the platform.  After completing the second cut the pieces separated automatically.  The rim pieces were cut to one quarter of the circumference of the platform using the plans to make the initial cuts, the fine tuning being done during assembly.

 

With the platform, rims and cleats made, I assembled them with neutral pH PVA glue.  Care has to be taken to see that the cleats are equally spaced and the rim pieces match up to each other, but otherwise construction is pretty straightforward.

 

The shafts of the cleats were made overlong so their tails extended into the lubber’s hole.  These tails were clipped off and the shafts tapered from the rim to the hole with a flap-wheel sander.

 

All of the corners and edges were cleaned up and rounded with a sanding stick then the top was given its first coat of finish.

 

 

Here I used Floquil clear flat, but with a few drops of my stain mixture (50% Natural, 25% Cherry, 25% Early American) added.  The finish enhanced the color of the cherry while the light stain brought the tone and hue of the birch into the same color family.  It even slightly enhanced the grain of the birch, as if it were older wood.  This is exactly the effect that I was looking for.  I think that I will be using this color palette a lot as the build continues.

 

The trestletrees and crosstrees were cut to length from 3mm x 6mm pear.  I used the Preac to cut the notches in the trestletrees to accept the crosstrees.  Tapers were sanded on all eight arms as shown on the plans, then they were installed on the underside of the platforms.

 

 

Holes for the crowsfoot lines were drilled through the forward rim.  I spaced them a bit closer together at the center to account for the anticipated narrowing effect as the top curves away from the euphroe.  I’ll see how that works out when it is rigged.

 

The elongated holes for the upper deadeye strops were roughly cut by drilling two holes side by side then using the drill bit to nibble out the wood between them.

 

 

Finally, I indicated the nails that hold the two layers of planking together where they overlap.  As with the boats, these were indicated by drilling shallow holes with a #80 (0.012”) drill.  A wash of stain mix was flooded over the holes and immediately wiped off.  It darkened the holes without changing the color of the planks.  This is a technique that I will use again as well.

 

 

There will be additional holes to mount a number of blocks under the tops, but I have not studied the rigging plan enough yet to locate them.  For now, here are the six tops ready for storage till needed.

 

 

I'm up in the country this weekend, so hopefully I will soon have some progress to share on the hulls.

 

Dan

 

  

Edited November 14, 2013 by shipmodel

[Chuck]

Very nicely done.  That top is looking good.  

 

You work fast Dan.  Hows the trigger finger?

 

Chuck

[DSiemens]

Beautiful work.  The QAR is one I've considered for a long time.  Your research is more extensive then mine and I think you blew my theories out of the water.  I had read that the Conorde was actually a British built ship that was captured and modified by the french for slaving.  I think I read that on Wikipedia so it may not be a very valuable source.  I found a ship on page 111 of The Story of Sail by Verez Laszlo and Richard Woodman that fit this description and time period and had thought to build a ship similar to that.  It's called the Sweepstakes built in 1708 by the British and captured by the French later to be recaptured by the British before being decommissioned.  The ship was built as a fifth rate with 36 guns.  The guns on the lower deck were "to few to be effective"  as the author put it.  My thought was if QAR was like Sweepstakes then after capture the lower deck would have been redone to close up the gun ports making her a slave vessel with 22 guns.  I had thought that the QAR had more guns then twenty and Black Beard could have cut out more gun ports as needed.  I remember reading that they found more then twenty guns at the wreck which would have supported my theory but then many of those could have been used for ballast as well.  I think the contemporary reports and court martial testimony though trump all.  That and the ship being built in France as opposed to England refutes the idea of QAR looking anything like the Sweepstakes.  Perhaps it's a good think I haven't started this build.  I look forward to seeing more of your work.                   

[shipmodel]

Hi Daniel -

 

Thanks for the compliments, but you are giving me way too much credit for the research.  It is all the product of the team down at the North Carolina Maritime Museum, and made available online by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Affairs.  Here is the link to the History page: 

 

http://wayback.archive-it.org/org-67/20120514234115/http://www.qaronline.org/History/historyintro.htm

 

My own research is more aimed at resolving modeling issues, such as the differences between French and British rigging practices of the period.

 

Be well

 

Dan

[shipmodel]

Hi all - thanks for looking in.

 

Another week, another report.  The hulls are not going as well as could be hoped, so here is another deour.

 

To go with the tops that were built last time, I am now making the masts.  I took a plank of rock maple and cut it down to the dimensions of the masts and spars that I measured from the Budriot plans.  They are cut as square sticks sized to the largest width of the ultimate mast or spar, then cut to length.  As long as I was cutting, I cut duplicates for the two models.  Here are most of them, from the 5/8” x 19” of the main mast, down to the 3/16” x  6” of the main stunsail boom.

 

 

These were all cut on a Hegner Mk 4 multi-tool.   It is a mid-sized tool that fits between the Preac and a full sized table saw, and is perfect for the size of the QAR models.  It has a table saw, router, disc sander, and a Jacobs chuck that can power a flexible shaft grinding tool or an add-on lathe unit.  I picked it up used and it came without an instruction manual, but I am figuring it out as I go.

 

 

After all of the pieces were cut, I turned first to the main mast.  It is a fairly simple tapered cylinder.  I planned to use the lathe on the Hegner, but it will only take 12” work pieces, not the 19” of the mast.  Without access to a larger one I went back to basics to carve the mast.

 

The first step was to cut the tenon for the mast cap while the blank was still square.  The blade height and rip fence were adjusted on the table saw and the tenon was quickly cut out on all four faces.  Then the blank was made octagonal.  This was done in the usual way by marking out the 2-3-2 divisions down the length of the blank with a dividers.  With a sharp block plane the corners were taken down to the lines, resulting in the eight sided stick on the right.

 

 

After the corners were marked up as sight guides, they were taken down and rounded with a coarse disc in a hand-held random orbit sander.  I didn't find it difficult to do this, since it only had to be accurate enough for a first approximation.  I paused frequently to mark up any high spots that I felt when I spun the blank between my fingers.  Then they were sanded down and the process was repeated till it felt round.

 

 

Once the round blank was achieved I went to the plans and determined that the diameter just under the cap was 7/16”.  This was marked onto the top of the mast using a circle guide.  Using a coarse sanding drum in the Dremel I took the mast down to that size in a sharp taper right at the top.  I would pull the drum towards me, grinding off a thin slice from the mast, then rotate the blank a little and repeat.  One corner of the top tenon was marked so I would not forget to make a complete circle before checking my progress.

 

 

From there I moved down the length of the blank: grinding a strip with the dremel and turning the blank a little bit, grinding and turning, grinding and turning.  In essence, I became a very slow lathe.  After doing this for a while I would smooth out any humps and hollows that developed by sanding the blank on a sheet of sandpaper which has been glued to a piece of plexiglass laid flat of the workbench. 

 

 

This process would have taken much longer if the mast had a straight taper from base to cap.  However, the plans had these two little beehive drawings which had to be the tapering diagrams.  They were only designated ‘a’ and ‘b’, but after comparing them to the plans I determined that the one on the left fits the three lower masts, while the one on the right fits only the bowsprit.

 

 

This tapering process continued for what seemed like a very long time until I could slide the mast up through the top with the masthead extending above the top as indicated on the plans.

 

 

Now the pieces to support the crosstrees and top were made.  Unlike English practice, there are no hounds, cheeks or bibs.  Instead, the French at the time used only a front fish that fit to the mast and slid up between the crosstrees.  A two-part bolster was fitted to each side and treenailed to the mast and to the front fish.  Here are the plans.

 

 

The fish was made out of pear and treenailed to the mast with walnut dowels for contrast.  The fish is also held in place by a pair of wooldings that lie in broad grooves carved into the face of the piece.

 

 

The bolsters are also pear and treenailed with walnut.  The only technical point here is that it was made in one piece, not two.  The staggered separation line was drawn on in pencil, then the back of a #11 blade was used to scribe the lines, which tattoos the pencil marks into the wood.

 

 

The mast is reinforced by alternating iron mast bands and wooldings.  The bands are made from 1/16” wide brass strips which are wrapped around the mast and sized to fit, then chemically blackened.  They are attached temporarily with glue before holes are drilled for metal pins.  Each end of the strip where they meet gets one, and a third is placed on the opposite side of the mast.    The pins are annealed iron wire which is inserted, glued, and clipped short before being peened smooth.  You can see one on the band near the bottom end of the front fish and another just below the light reflection on the other band.

 

Working in a large scale like 1/36 will allow me to build some details much as they are made in full sized practice.  The wooldings are a case in point.  A cherry strip was cut, soaked and bent around the mast before being glued in place.  3” rope (1” diameter) is wrapped 13 turns around the mast, packed tightly against the wood strip, and cinched tight.  A second cherry strip is added to the other side of the wrapping.  A painting of dilute PVA glue secures everything.  Once the glue is dry, everything was given a coat of the finish and rubbed down.

 

 

The top was fit back on the masthead to see that everything fit properly.  The inset shows how the front fish comes up to the level of the top of the crosstrees and takes the place of the spacer that, in English practice, separates the masthead from the heel of the topmast.   There is a third mast band that should be around the masthead just above the top, but the platform would not fit around it so it was removed until the top is permanently attached to the mast. [sharp eyes will also notice that the crowsfoot holes are towards the back of the mast.  This will be turned around before the top is attached].

 

 

So here are two of the shipyard workers just skylarking on the main top.  One seems to see a friend on the ground.

 

 

It’s a good thing that Dread Pirate Peter hasn’t spotted them.  He has some pointed questions to ask about the location of crowsfoot holes.  And why the bands and wooldings stop halfway down the mast.

 

 

Auf wiedersehen . . .

 

Dan

    

[shipmodel]

Hi Crackers -

 

A good question. 

 

My best answer for this is that transitions in shipbuilding were gradual things, not easily pinned down to a precise cutoff date..  Since the 1600s circular tops first lost their high sides, then they lost their low rims, and by the end of the 17th century were simple flat platforms.  As you said, in English practice they started to lose their circular shape during the 18th century.  But this transition would have come later to French shipbuilding practice, especially in a yard that catered to private firms and families, rather than the more cutting edge yards that worked for the French Navy.  The change also probably came earlier to larger ships where the savings in weight could have been substantial.

 

To put it another way, Lees, Marquhardt, and zu Mondfeld all show a circular top dated around 1700 for Continental practice.  The clincher is that Budriot draws the plans that way, and I am tasked to follow the plans.  Who am I to argue. . .

 

Be well

 

Dan

[DSiemens]

Dan Great work!  I have a question as well.  Can you describe the scribing technique you used on the bolsters in greater detail?  I use a different scribing technique with nail polish and wood stain but as you can imagine it's a lot more involved.  Some thing simpler and still as accurate like what you describe would be very helpful.  

[shipmodel]

Hi Daniel -

 

It really is just as simple as it sounds.  If you look at the plan for the bolster there is a zig-zag line dividing the forward and aft pieces that fit together.  Once I had the shape of the bolster cut and tapered, I drew on the line with a straightedge and a sharp pencil.  Then I went over the lines with the straightedge guiding the back (dull) side of a #10 blade, the curved one, not the pointed #11 blade.  I pushed down fairly hard to make a groove in the wood.  This would have made a visible line all by itself, but I find that doing this pushes the graphite from the pencil down into the groove, darkening it and making it stand out.

 

I used this same technique on the teak bench seats for the Swan 42 model.  In the computer I drew the multiple wood pieces for the seats, the side-by-side planks and the perimeter framing.  Once it was done to my liking and sized to the model, I printed it out onto thin veneer.  It looked good, but when I scribed the lines the printer ink was driven into the grooves, making seams that in some indescribable way look much more realistic than the simple printed version.

 

 

Anyway, it seems to work for me.  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

 

Dan

 

 

[DSiemens]

Thanks Dan that does look great.  I will give it shot on one of my builds.  Also your log has inspired me to start a QAR build.  It won't be near as sophisticated as yours but it is a build I've often researched and thought of doing.  Now is as good a time as any.  Thanks.  

[shipmodel]

Hello again. 

 

I trust that everyone has recovered from Thanksgiving, Hanukkah, and all that tryptophan in the turkey.  Not to mention all the family that may have descended on you as they did to us.  I have a greater appreciation than ever for the wit and wisdom of Winston Churchill. . .

 

I did manage to get in some work on the hull.  The lower portion of the first hull was fully shaped using templates as usual.  The aft portion of the gun deck was built up with tapered stacks of basswood to match the rise of the sheer line, then sanded down to make a smooth curved surface at the centerline.  A camber (round-up) of the deck of 1/8" from the centerline to the bulwark edge was plotted from the plans.  I marked and sanded this into the gun deck surface.  When I was happy with the underwater shape and the deck curves, the hull was given its first coat of sandable primer.  Rough areas, uneven curves, and other problem spots were dealt with and re-primed.

 

Although the hull will probably be tweaked some more, I started working out the bulwarks and hull sides above the gun deck.  Here you can see that the main bulwarks have been cut from 1/4" basswood to the shape taken from the NMM draught.  From the transom and taffrail to a point just aft of the forecastle the ship's sides were a consistently flat shape.  There will be some curves sanded into them later, and they will be bent to match the perimeter of the deck, but for the internal support, the basswood pieces are more than adequate.

 

 

At this point they are still flat and straight.  They sit with a tumblehome of 13 degrees using the blocks and clamps to get and idea of what they will look like and how they will fit.

 

Here I am cutting the rabbet that the bulwarks will sit in.  Since I do not have a router, I cut the horizontal channel using the Dremel grinding disc.  I have the large circular saw blade, but the thought of freehanding the cut with the agressive teeth was a little too scary.  It took a good deal longer, but if I had slipped I figured that all I would get would be a sanding injury, not an opened vein.

 

Once the horizontal channel was ground, I used a wood chisel to make the vertical cuts that removed wood and established the rabbet.  It was cleaned up with sanding blocks, then the inside face was angled to match the tumblehome.

 

 

Back in Brooklyn I returned to the masts.  Here are the two topmast blanks.  As shown on the plans, the mast shaft is offset towards the aft edge of the square heel.  In the photo you can see that I used the Preac to cut down the forward face of the square blank. 

 

 

At the heel you can see it more clearly.

 

 

The port and starboard faces of the stick were cut down half the amount that the forward face was, which squared up the stick again.  Now I could mark it out, cut the tenon with the table saw, then plane it octagonal as was done with the lower mast.

 

 

The square stick was shaped to a cylinder.  Then the upper and lower edges of the wider section that holds up the trestletrees was cut on the table saw.  I whittled the wood down till it matched the cut channels.  Then the balance of the wood was removed with sanding drums, sanding sticks and sandpaper.

 

 

At the heel you can see the construction sequence clearly.  The three sides are reduced with the table saw, then shaped with the sanding drum to fair the offset round shaft to the square heel.

 

 

Once the heel is shaped, a fid hole is drilled through and squared up with a needle file.  Two mock sheaves are drilled and shaped on an angle that ultimately lines up with eyebolts on the cap.  These are for the leads of the lifting ropes.  The completely shaped topmasts were give a coat of finish and set aside.

 

 

The mast caps were shaped from the plans from pear.  They have the Continental humped form, with holes and grooves along the edges of the cap for the lifting ropes.  They were made from a forward and aft piece, with a notched seam held together with iron straps.  Straps also crossed the bottom, fore and aft faces of the cap.  Here is the blank with the hole for the topmast drilled.  The other has been shaped and the seam between the forward and aft pieces scribed as before.  The piece was finished and the straps glued on.

 

 

The straps were drilled for 0.020" iron wire pins.  These were inserted and cut off long before being glued.  Once the glue dried they were cut almost flat, then peened smooth.

 

 

Four eyebolts were drilled and mounted on the underside of the cap through the supporting straps and the caps were complete.

 

 

The topmast trestletrees were cut and shaped to match the plans.  The crosstrees were shaped from wider pieces of wood so they could splay out, then half-lapped into the trestletrees.  Holes for the shroud lines were drilled before they were tapered per the plans, then finished.

 

 

The topmast cap was cut and shaped much like the lower caps, but these were one piece units with iron straps that could be opened when the topgallant mast was taken down.  This is useful, because the truck at the masthead won't fit through the opening without opening the strap.

 

 

So here are all the components of both main masts.  The second topmast, the upper one in the photo, had a knot in it that took up the stain badly.  I will minimize it with a darker finish, but in the fullness of time it will be replaced and used as one of the spare spars that will fit along the open waist in the finished ship.

 

 

Here they are all set up.  From the deck the mast reaches some 31 inches to the truck.  This is going to be one mother of a fully rigged model.

 

 

There will probably be a longer break until my next post.  I will be building the foremasts, which are almost identical to the main masts, so no new techniques will be used.  I will be back when they are done.

 

Happy Holidays to all.

 

Dan

 

 

 

[dafi]

Wonderful work :-)

 

Nice touch and feel and great craftmansship!

 

 

Cheers, Daniel

[DSiemens]

Looking great!  

[shipmodel]

Hello and Happy New Year to all -

 

This past month has been full of grandkids and holidays that got in the way of what is the most important thing in life - ship modeling

 

I did manage to complete both sets of the masts, which are packed away until rigging time.  The fore

 

 

The mizzen

 

 

And the Bowsprit and jib boom

 

 

Meanwhile, I have been studying the rigging diagrams and reading Anderson and others.  The first question came when I realized that some of the lines, including the halyards, run from the mastheads to belaying points on deck at the base of the mast.  To do this they have to pass through the platform of the top.  Budriot's plans and the tops that I made from them have no openings aft of the masthead. 

 

 

I figured that I could solve this in one of two ways - I could simply drill some holes for the lead of the lines, or I could take apart the tops and remove some of the planking to make a larger opening, a much more complicated procedure.  I consulted with some knowledgable modelers including Rob Napier, and Bob Giles sent me some photographs of the tops of the St. George (1701) model at Annapolis. 

 

 

I also looked at the photographs of the model of Le Sans-Pareil (1757) in the Musee de la Marine.  All of them agreed that removing the planking was the only way to go.  So, with some anxiety, I pried off the trestletrees and crosstrees from under each of the tops.  Fortunately they came away with only one slight greenstick fracture that was easily repaired.  The cleats were shortened, then I used a razor saw to cut through the plank aft of the lubber hole.  The enlarged opening was cleaned up with a blade and sandpaper before the trestletrees and crosstrees were cleaned up and re-attached.  Here they are.  

 

 

Next, the gratings and coamings.  I have worked out a new way to do them which gives me better results in this larger scale.

 

Be well

 

Dan  

[michael mott]

They look good Dan. Seems to be one of those things that we are forever coming up against, stepping forward then back and then forward again.

 

Michael

Edited January 9, 2014 by michael mott

[BareHook]

Nice work! excellent catch in planning the rigging.

[Blademaster2444]

Your mast look amazing

[shipmodel]

Hi all, and thanks for the comments and likes.

 

The next set of independent pieces to be made were the three hatches with gratings.  One two-part one goes on the quarterdeck, while the other two go on the gun deck under the boat in the waist.  My method for making gratings is a bit unusual in that it there is little or no measuring done with a ruler or calipers.  Everything is done relative to the thickness of the saw blade that is used.  I developed this method because I only have a Preac saw.  A milling machine might make the whole process easier, but I work with what I have.

 

The first thing is to set up the saw to make square section sticks of wood whose dimension will be about 2  inches in the scale being used.  This then has to  match the thickness of a saw blade that you have.  For the small grating I used a slitting saw blade that was 0.032” thick. 

 

To set the saw I sandwiched that blade between a second blade and the rip fence.  The fence is snugged up and locked down.  The cutting blade does not have to be the same thickness, although in this case it was since I have two blades of that same thickness.

 

[These first nine photos are in black and white because they are taken from another presentation on making much smaller gratings].

 

 

Several sticks 0.032” square were cut from a sheet of hardwood.  Only a few are needed.  Then the blade that matches the sticks is mounted in the saw, if it is not already there.   Two of the sticks are sandwiched between the blade and the fence which is snugged tight and locked down.

 

 

One stick is removed and a short section of the other is held firmly against the fence and tacked in place with extra thin cyano.  Care is taken to see that the fence is not glued to the table.

 

 

The fence is removed, leaving a guide strip parallel to the blade and one blade thickness to the right. 

 

 

A rectangular piece of hardwood sheet is selected and held against the guide strip and the miter guage.  The blade height is set up to cut just a tiny bit deeper than halfway through the sheet.

 

 

The wood is run over the blade, cutting a channel one blade thickness from the end.

 

 

The wood is flipped over and the slot that was just cut is placed on top of the guide strip. 

 

 

The wood is run through again, cutting a second channel two thicknesses to the left of the first channel.

 

 

The balance of the sheet is cut in the same way, making a series of channels parallel to each other and spaced two blade widths apart.

 

 

Here is the grating sheet for the QAR. At my scale I needed sticks and channels that were about 0.055”.  I took one of the 0.032” blades and stacked it together with a 0.023” blade, making a 0.055” dado blade.

 

 

Actually, for the small grating I used Portia Takakjian’s technique.  This involves cutting lots of square sticks as well as cutting cross channels across the first ones.  The cross channels are filled with the sticks and everything is glued together.  When dry the solid back of the sheet is ground off with a sanding drum.  This works well for a small grating, but the wider blade did not cut as cleanly so I kept getting tearout.  Also, I needed more than 25 square inches of grating and did not look forward to grinding off so much wood.

 

Instead, I removed the guide strip and set the saw to cut 0.55” using the blades as spacers again.  Strips were parted off the sheet until the material was used up.  I call them toothed strips for obvious reasons.

 

 

Three quarters of the toothed strips were cut into thirds and interlocked with the remaining long strips.

 

 

This created a grating sheet about 2 ½ by 7 ½ inches.  This was only enough to make the gratings for one of the models, so a second grating sheet was made in the same way.

 

 

From the sheets I cut out sections for the grating sizes that I needed, sanded the edges flush and gave them a coat of slightly darkened matte finish to protect them from glue stains when the coamings get built around them.

 

 

Overall, this method worked well for me, and I will try it in smaller scales in the future.  A tip of the hat to Charlie Files, inventor of the Preac, wherever you are.

 

I will have the log of making the coamings in a few days.  Until then, be well.

 

Dan

 

 

[DSiemens]

Very nicely done!  

[mtaylor]

Nice way of doing this as it seems to cut down the setup time.

[michael mott]

Very Nice Dan, I shall have to give this a try.

 

Michael

[shipmodel]

Hello again –

 

I got some time during the football games to write up the next installment.  I hope you enjoy it.

 

With the grating sheets made, I made the coamings.  My method here also relies on the table saw and uses no measuring with a ruler.  This time it is based on the specific grating to be framed.  I make the coaming to fit the grating rather than the other way around.  I get a much tighter fit that way.  

 

Here is a piece of grating that has been cut from a sheet.  The edges have been sanded flush and it has received a first finish coat to protect it from any glue stains.  It looks square, but it is slightly longer than it is wide.

 

 

As mentioned, the grating material is poplar.  For contrast I selected cherry for the coaming and cut stock 1/8” x ¼”.  Four pieces of coaming stock were cut longer than each side of the grating piece.  They will be joined with half lap joints at the corners.

 

 

The table saw blade height is set so cuts made from the top and bottom of the coaming stock just meet in the middle.

 

 

One end of each piece has a half lap cut into it.  The length does not matter as long as it is longer than the thickness of the coaming stock.  First, the shoulder was cut using the rip fence as a depth stop.

 

 

Then the lap was made by making multiple passes moving away from the fence to nibble away the unwanted wood.

 

 

A spacer strip was located that was wider but shallower than the lap that was cut.

 

 

Using the spacer and the grating piece the fence was set for the shorter sides.

 

 

A sacrificial stick supports the coaming piece as the shoulder for the second half lap is cut.

 

 

The coaming piece was turned around and the unwanted wood from the second lap was nibbled away.

 

 

The matching short piece was done, then the saw was reset and the longer pieces were done in the same manner.

 

 

Using the grating piece itself to hold the pieces square, they were test fit, adjusted as needed, assembled and glued.  When the glue was dry, support pieces were glued to the inside edges.  Doing only two sides is enough.  If you want the grating to be removable just make sure that the supports are glued only to the coaming.  Here I have glued the grating in place permanently. 

 

 

The corners were trimmed, the piece was turned over and sanded smooth, and all edges and corners were eased.  The bottom edges are left raw and will be sanded to the curve of the deck when installed.   The piece was finished with matte varnish.  

 

 

And here is the set of three for one of the QAR models.  In the insert the lap joint is clearly visible.  The joints were also treenailed for strength.   Two diagonal corners of each coaming were drilled but not filled.  During assembly longer treenails will go through them and into the deck for security.  A length of treenail stock is packed with the set ready for final assembly.

 

 

As you can tell from the brevity of the text, this all goes quite quickly with a some practice.  All of the work making the six hatches and gratings took only a little more than a day.  Doing the photographing and writing these build log entries took longer.

 

I hope that this was instructive and provides another technique to add to your tool box.

 

Be well

 

Dan

 

Edited May 8, 2014 by shipmodel