Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thank you very much my friends.
 

Hi B.E. thanks for the tip. You are right but indeed there are too many dubious points with this ship. Even the belaying pins were most likely not in use at that period. . I've omitted some of them and also reduced the numbers but some of them remained.

As source I've also an article from NRJ and Pastor's AOS "The ships of Christopher Columbus". But I must confess that I've not tried my best.

(I don't remember exactly, I've read somewhere that leech lines do exist before the buntlines. But I should check this)

 

P.S. for the moderator. I've attached some pages from a journal and a book. If there is a problem with the copyright I can delete them.  

post-207-0-83900200-1382617283_thumb.jpg

post-207-0-54910100-1382617361_thumb.jpg

post-207-0-13683400-1382617387_thumb.jpg

post-207-0-97088000-1382617401_thumb.jpg

post-207-0-96205600-1382617442_thumb.jpg

Edited by Ilhan Gokcay
Posted

There are two replicas. One of them based on drawings of Colin Mudie (See the article on NRJ). This is the Bristol replica.

My drawings are based unfortunately on the other replica built at Bonavista.

Posted

Hello IIhan,

 

I wasn't intending to suggest that there was anything wrong with your rigging arrangement, I'm not very familiar with 15th Century rigging, and it is a  period where perhaps not unnaturally there is less detailed information than for the later periods I'm more familiar with.

 

However I was moved by curiosity to check in Anderson's The Rigging of Ships in the days of the Spritsail Topmast 1600 - 1720.

 

What you show on Matthew  are called Martnets and they did run up both sides of the sail, and performed the same function as the more simple form of Leechlines which superceded them around the middle of the Seventeenth Century, although there was the inevitable transition period where the information gets a little hazy.

 

As far as Buntlines go Anderson does suggest that they were in use certainly around 1600, and it would seem odd to devise such elaborate rigging to haul in the Leech of the sail and not fit ropes to help lift the foot of a sail.

 

B.E.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

 

Posted (edited)

Hi B.E. its ok. Your questions are right but I've no answer. By the time I've found the text about the leech lines and bunt lines. It was from "Mondfeld" and I am not able to comment on the reliability of this information.

There are also no traces of foot ropes for that period. Maybe sails are not furled tight to the yard as we think of it but hold together somehow and the yard was lowered to the deck.

For my model of Mayflower I've strictly followed R.C.Anderson. But for the period of Matthew there are lots of questions.

 

Cheers

Ilhan

post-207-0-57662000-1382698070.jpg

Edited by Ilhan Gokcay
Posted

Ilhan, your model looks very fine, it looks like you are closing in on a finish.

 

Michael

Current builds  Bristol Pilot Cutter 1:8;      Skipjack 19 foot Launch 1:8;       Herreshoff Buzzards Bay 14 1:8

Other projects  Pilot Cutter 1:500 ;   Maria, 1:2  Now just a memory    

Future model Gill Smith Catboat Pauline 1:8

Finished projects  A Bassett Lowke steamship Albertic 1:100  

 

Anything you can imagine is possible, when you put your mind to it.

Posted

Thank you very much my friends. Nothing much left. It will be finished soon.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Beautiful, Ilhan.  Congratulations.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

  • 9 months later...
Posted
Posted

Hi Ilhan, I had wondered where you had disappeared, but it appears you were tucked away finishing this gem of a build.  very nice finish, cleanly built and presented - an all round beautiful model mate.

 

cheers

 

Pat

If at first you do not suceed, try, and then try again!
Current build: HMCSS Victoria (Scratch)

Next build: HMAS Vampire (3D printed resin, scratch 1:350)

Built:          Battle Station (Scratch) and HM Bark Endeavour 1768 (kit 1:64)

Posted

Congratulations on a very beautiful ship, Ilhan.  It's an exceptional piece of workmanship.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...