-
Posts
1,080 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by Siggi52
-
-
Hello,
today I looked also through all the pictures in the gallery for historical models, no handrails. What druxey at the end said is may be right. All ladder ways are behind, or in front of capstans. So nobody would stumble into them as an accident. And also at night it would't be absolutely dark, somewhere is always a moon, star or lantern, so they did't need these handrails really. Also at these small ways, left and right over the waist, no rails. Only the Royal William from 1719, SLR0222, had there rails.
The only handrail I found, except those for the officers, was at the Mod. No 34 Vol II, of the Rogers collection, and there from the gun deck down to the orlop deck. Between the capstan and mizzen mast. But with these models I'm not sure if there is all really historical correct.
That would be the next question, should I left these rails I had build at the gun deck? It is not too late to plug them out.
Question over question. I think I did't build them at the upper gun deck, but leave them at the gun deck. At many models they did't even build the ladders, there is only the row of gratings. So would it look, when the capstan is in use.
- bruce d, shipman, Hubac's Historian and 5 others
-
8
-
Hello,
the ladders are ready! That means also, the gun deck is ready 😃
But one after the other, here are the parts of the puzzle
And here the puzzle is completed
And here the carpenters have them installed, the shipwright is very pleased.
and all together in the totale.
I'm wondering that I never saw a model with rails around, at least, the ladder way in the waist. Did't they had there none? And there are also no holes for them, so I think that they may not had them. Only the ladder way for the officers up to the quarter deck have rails.
The next thing then is planking the upper gun deck
-
Hello,
thank you druxey, I have so my problems with names, even in German. I don't think that these pawls where the normality, so mostly you see the two pawls side by side, one for each direction and without these rings at the end. So I think, that when they stop turning around, one man in the middle push the pawl in and „then“ the others could relax.
But at least I have also the pawls for the back capstan installed. The next things then are the ladders.
- shipman, Jorge Diaz O, bruce d and 12 others
-
15
-
Hello and thank you for your likes and comments,
today the carpenters set the stoppers for the first capstan in. This art of stopper I found at that little 60 gunner I saw at Chatham too. SLR0472
With these stoppers you cold work in both directions with both stoppers. Interesting is also that eye at there ends. Here I think you could set the stoppers, with a rope, from outside of that bunch of men working there rounds here.
These pieces of wood under the lower chocks prevent that the stopper would escape into the nirvana under the capstan. Only the upper capstans had them at the drawing for the Dorsetshire. So I think, that the lower capstans had no stoppers.
- rybakov, mtaylor, Theodosius and 12 others
-
15
-
-
- Keith Black, mtaylor, FriedClams and 10 others
-
7
-
6
-
-
-
-
- oneslim, shipman, Theodosius and 21 others
-
24
-
Hello,
I finished now also the last gratings at the upper gun deck. But when I started to plan the capstans, I realises that I had build the bases for them too small. 😬
I made the upper flat 24 mm Ø, and I don't know why. The capstans at the Dorsetshire, at the plans for the Tiger they are not drawn, have at there bases a diameter of 28 mm! And at the most plans I looked at, the capstans have nearly the same measurements there.
The stanchions at the front of them came out without any damages, and what a wonder, I had left over two extra 😃 So today I turned two rings to enlarge these bases, as you may see at the pictures.
-
- Jorge Diaz O, gjdale, GrandpaPhil and 18 others
-
19
-
2
-
- chris watton, rybakov, Keith Black and 20 others
-
22
-
1
-
- albert, hollowneck, FriedClams and 17 others
-
20
-
Hello,
and many thanks for your efforts Mark. Alexander found in Goodwin's book English Man of War, 1719 establishment list, under gun deck and plank, page 249 binding strakes. The same for the middle deck, under Flat, page 252 and for the upper gun deck also under flat the next page. What is the difference between plank and flat?
That means, I have to build them, but as you already said, I do not inlet them.
I have also a little upgrade at the shipyard
- shipman, Theodosius, hollowneck and 22 others
-
24
-
1
-
-
Good morning Mark,
and many thanks for your efforts. Yesterday I read a lot, and came to the solution, to omit the binding strakes.
You say, that you did't have contracts from the time of 1702 to 1755. That was the time of the establishment, and in the lists are no binding strakes mentioned. And may be, as you say, it was left to the shipwright. I think, when Anson became the 1. Lord of the Admiralty(1751) and Slade and Batly were the Surveyors of the Navy (1755), they reintroduced the binding strake.
- Keith Black and mtaylor
-
2
-
Many thanks Mark,
then I build them as planks on top of the beams, the full breath of the planks from stem to stern.
- mtaylor, FriedClams, Keith Black and 2 others
-
5
-
Hello and thank you for your comments,
Mark, are that really binding strakes? I know that they may have the same function even if they are only nailed on top of the beams. Falconer, Lavery and even Goodwin did't mention them. In the 1815 edition of Falconer they are mentioned and of corse in Boudriot book about the 74 gunner from 1780.
A colleagues in a German forum has posted this from: "18th CENTURY SHIPBUILDING - Remarks on the Navies of the English & Dutch" von Blaise Ollivier?
That should be from 1737, but who did write the note to the left, and when?
Druxey, that is the only source I have. But I thought to get them out it would be helpful to have some room under them. Also for airing the surface of the beams there.
Chuck, thank you too
-
-
Thank you for your likes, and Greg, exactly that is the plan.
- mtaylor, Keith Black, FriedClams and 1 other
-
4
-
- druxey, victory78, FriedClams and 17 others
-
20
-
Hello,
today I started building the gratings. To show you how I did it, here some pictures.
I think the pictures explain how I work. It is important, to cut first the grooves transverse to the grain. Otherwise you would have later a large puzzle.
I leave them over night so, that they may straighten out a little more and glue the battens tomorrow in. After that, I grind the back away, and they are ready.
But at least I have a question. At Falconers deck plan (gun deck) you could see to the left and right of the gratings and ladder ways two planks, who are going more or less straight through the ship. Those with the rings for the canons, Z. Was that also at the upper gun deck so? At the models you see mostly only the waist.
- Wintergreen, shipman, Jorge Diaz O and 14 others
-
16
-
1
-
I really don't know that Joe. But why not, may be in an other version? The carpenter on board has sometimes also something to build or to repair.
- mtaylor and Keith Black
-
2
HMS Tiger 1747 by Siggi52 - 1:48 - 60 gun ship from NMM plans
in - Build logs for subjects built 1501 - 1750
Posted
Druxey, there you are right, and also that the coamings are a little higher then the deck is. That, and that the sailors know there ship. They worked there day and night and then, Keith, I think they find there way. And at the deck below is at least a lantern shining. I don't think that at the gun or orlop deck is absolutely darkness at night. Such a ship never sleeps.
But the question is, did they have hand rails, or not? If yes I think, at one or the other model you would see them. I did't find any.