Jump to content

BANYAN

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR
  • Posts

    5,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BANYAN

  1. Great idea Keith - now that is thinking outside the square (oops sorry you want square don't you ) cheers Pat
  2. Nice pick up Steve, I wish I had been as diligent Nice work on the shroud whippings - far better than mine. cheers Pat
  3. HI Dave, many thanks for that but I have the dimensions now that I had to recalculate it all - but I do appreciate the offer. cheers Pat
  4. Thanks for looking in Keith, Steve and Mike. Sorry Keith - my engineering man is tied up for a while (not with my work either). I still need some adjustments on this as we get to know it better but it is a "nice" tool. Appreciate this feedback re scale errors folks - nice pick up Steve. I made the topmasts and poles some time back in preparation for rigging so no matter what, I would have had to redo them anyway - practice makes perfect they say. I will have to take down the topmast shrouds, but they will be reusable as they will not be shorter I have to find some positives. You can bet your bottom dollar I will not be taking the published scales at face value anymore cheers Pat
  5. Hi Mike - Very displeased but a valuable lesson learned. You are absolutely right on both counts mate; the printed scale is incorrect - and I did use these and scaled accordingly. I had a discussion with the author this afternoon - he was not aware of this himself and appreciated the feedback. It appears the publishers have rescaled his drawings (which were all 1/4":1') to fit the page but did not provide the correctly adjusted text for the scale. I thought they looked a little too tall. This also explains why the mast caps weren't quite right - I thought it was my joinery. At least I can reuse the topmasts to sand them down to the smaller sizes - using the AL kit 1:1 drawing at least the lower masts and the mizzen are correct (but I will check) . Surprising this has not been reported before. How did you pick up on by by the way? cheers Pat
  6. Thanks Mike, I wasn't aware of this and I will be very displeased () if I have this wrong - I will double check tonight) cheers Pat
  7. Hi Russ, John, Slog, Greg and Keith; many thanks for looking in and your interest in my build. Greg, I'll PM separately; thanks for the offer of the article. WRT masts, the way you suggest is the way most people do it. To be totally honest, I made all the bits and then experimented to establish the best way for aligning the deadeyes/doing the shrouds. I then forgot to remove them to do the upper work and I have progressed with building the masts on the model. This has actually been beneficial in some respects but it is probably horses for courses as to your approach. I am lucky in that I can adjust my work table up and down and I have a home built working rest for working on rigging that makes the task easier to do on the model. I'll post a picky of it next update. Keith the duplicator is a self design with some engineering work by a mutual acquaintance. You would need to talk with him cheers Pat
  8. Another update, but to the workshop more so than Endeavour. A fellow club member has assisted with some of the engineering which has helped greatly. The duplicator (for my Sherline lathe) is an adaption of a design by David Antscherl in his TFFM series. I have yet to try this in fully-fledged anger, but the trials and testing is very pleasing. cheers Pat
  9. Hi folks, as promised another small update - slowly getting there. I am now working on the topmasts with only the shrouds on the foretopmast to go at this level. I have also made a temporary cover to act as a dust cover when not working on her. cheers Pat
  10. Hi again folks, I have applied some of the resin and waiting for it to fully set to see if this is better than a putty option, which from reports I have read sometimes falls out of resin. I will post a full report once it has set. In the meantime I have made a small start on getting rid of excess flash/moulding etc. While looking around the net for ideas etc I came across the following from Hobby Elements (no connections etc) - it works great on resin. I have it set up in my Dremel shaft for that extra bit of flexibility. It is a 3mm shaft so unfortunately does not fit in the dental tool (2.34mm) cheers Pat
  11. Pete, the helmsman (men in rough weather) stood to the side of the wheel not behind it. Hope this clarifies? cheers Pat
  12. Hi all, Thanks for looking in Patrick (great name!), Mark and Dave. Dave Vampire 1 was one of the ships in our old 'V' class and formed part of the 'scrap-iron' flotilla during WWII in the Med. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrap_Iron_Flotilla - Vampire II, along with Voyager and Vendetta, were named in their honour and followed the RN tradition of renaming ships with the same name if they had 'honourable' names and histories. The scrap iron flotilla proved a very big thorn in the side of German attempts to supply their troops and trying to isolate ours - got quite a name for themselves. The number of names that can be used that start with V are limited so perhaps that is one of the reasons for "Vampire"? Brian, here is an example of what I mean by the pin-holing (you need to open it the larger size); appreciate your interest in this little project. I don't know if this is normal (this degree of holes) for resin or not as it is my first one cheers Pat
  13. While assessing the Resin kit version I had decided to change the turrets provided in the kit. A close inspection shows that some of turrets were subtly different. Only B turret had the aerial mounting platform, and other turrets have different numbers of access panels. Bogey (from bogeys bits) was able to create a set that represents the turrets exactly as fitted in Vampire, and with a little more detail than the resin kit version provides. I am still trying to find brass barrels for the 4.5" guns, but will resort the printed ones. If you have a close look at the printed turrets, bogey provides two mounting options, one with, one without the barrels in situ. the design also allows the barrels to be set at any angle you like. There is also more detail provided in the barbette mounting/slip ring under the turret. This was fortuitous, as these parts are now part of the 3D printed kit. These bits are designed by Bogey and printed via shapeways in Frosted Extreme (FXD) Detail which really is great for showing detail, even at this small scale. See: http://www.shapeways.com/product/RVMV7YE2B/hmas-vampire-d11-4-5-inch-mk6-set-1-350-scale?li=shop-results&optionId=57742057&rc=SearchResults The following is a copy of picture from Bogey's page on Shapeways which shows what it can look like when painted. Also shown is a copy of the Limbo Mk10 mortar that will be fitted. Also note that this is a standard turret and that Vampire had 3 panels in hers. These printed items are good value for money and will allow me to show much more detail. Anyone know of a brass barrel manufacturer (at 1:350) for these 4.5" guns (Master does not have them)? cheers Pat
  14. Hi John (Neptune) thanks for looking in also. I have done a dry fit of the bits and pieces without having sanded the flash etc off and all seems to align pretty well but there will be a gap where the two hull halves join. As to the pin/holes, a tip I have picked up is to fill them with 5 min brush on resin gel (the stuff fingernail artists use) as it adheres better than putties and works well. I have picked up a bottle and intend to try it this weekend. cheers Pat
  15. Hi John (Jim Lad), thanks for looking in and the 'comments' - me bow - NEVER (well only until dinner time) cheers Pat
  16. Hi rpeteru; I went to Duchess after leaving Vampire and paid her off - many a fine run in the Sth Pacific Thanks for looking in mate. cheers Pat
  17. Hi Chris, yep in a tube in bubble wrap [Edit: I am no longer building the resin version Chris refers to and I discuss below] Not sure about the real quality of this kit yet. While there is a lot of hint of detail, not much is fine detail but at this scale that is to be expected I think? Also there are quite a few air bubble holes (larger than pinholes - probably 1 to 2mm wide, but also pinholes.) and the bubbling/descaling evident on the port bow at the waterline (see first photo). This is all repairable but perhaps should have been caught in QA? Perhaps I may have been expecting too much? I just had a quick look at your Torpedo Boat V108 - a very nice build and excellent finish. Is that a resin also. cheers Pat
  18. She's coming along very nicely Sharpie (despite your best efforts to destroy her ) cheers Pat
  19. Hey, great to see and hear from you Marty, thanks for the kudos, but I have seen the work on your models and your more than up to my standards I have just posted a very small update in the Latest Full Photograph section (http://modelshipworld.com/index.php/topic/1589-latest-full-profile-photograph-of-your-build/page-54) and I will be providing a more complete update here at the end of this weekend - I have progressed a little more cheers Pat
  20. The following photos show the various aspects of the parts designed by Bogey and printed in 3D (Frosted Extreme Detail - FXD) by Shapeways. This is my first resin 3D printed kit so I do not have much to compare with. That said it appears a sound kit; I certainly cannt complain about detail as Bogey has included everything we could find to represent her appearance in 1975/76. This detail shows up very well even at this scale (1:350). I will provide a more detailed report of all of the bits and pieces as I get to grips with what is / is not provided and where greater detail will be needed. These are the kit bits and pieces provided: There are still a few bits to come (mainly deck fittings), some PE and the decals. I look forward to making a start as the research has been quite enlightening - trying to remember what all the equipment and their locations and arrangements. I must also thanks Jim Lad (John) for the many trips to Vampire photographing all the details for me. cheers Pat
  21. Introduction The following overview of HMAS Vampire is adapted from the description provided in Wikipedia. Further details can be found at: http://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-vampire-ii and https://anmm.wordpress.com/tag/hmas-vampire/ The Royal Australian Navy initially ordered four Daring class destroyers, which were to be named after the ships of the "Scrap Iron Flotilla" of World War II. The ships were modified during construction: most changes were made to improve habitability, including the installation of air-conditioning. Vampire and her sister ships were the first all-welded ships to be constructed in Australia. The Darings had a standard displacement of 2,800 tons, which increased to 3,600 tons at full load. Vampire was 390 feet (120 m) long, with a beam of 43 feet (13 m), and a draught of 12 feet 9 inches (3.89 m) at mean, and 14 feet 6 inches (4.42 m) at full or deep load. Her propulsion system consisted of two Foster Wheeler boilers, feeding two English Electric geared turbines, which provided 54,000 horsepower (40,000 kW) to two propeller shafts. Vampire could sail at over 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph), and had a range of 3,700 nautical miles (6,900 km; 4,300 mi) at 20 knots (37 km/h; 23 mph). Her standard ship's company consisted of 20 officers and 300 sailors. Vampire was laid down at Cockatoo Island Dockyard in Sydney, New South Wales on 1 July 1952. The destroyer was launched on 27 October 1956 by the wife of the Governor-General, Sir William Slim. She was completed on 22 June 1959, and commissioned into the RAN in Sydney a day later. In June 1970, Vampire was handed over to Williamstown Naval Dockyard for a $US10 million modernisation. Vampire re-entered active service on 4 March 1972. On 25 June 1986, Vampire left active service. She was decommissioned on 13 August 1986, having spent 27 years in service, and travelled 808,026 nautical miles (1,496,464 km). She was later presented to the Australian National Maritime Museum for preservation as a museum ship. I will be depicting her as she was when I served in her in 1973 through to mid-1976 when she was COMAUSDESRON 2 (Commander Australian Destroyer Squadron 2). Her livery will reflect the “pretty work” detail she had when were deployed to the SE Asia station and her visit to the US Bicentennial celebrations. She will therefore be sporting nice white bollards, fairleads and other tiddly bits . At that time, post-refit, her main armament comprised six 4.5-inch (110 mm) Mark V guns mounted in three Mark 6 twin turrets, two forward and one aft. Her anti-aircraft outfit consisted of six 40 mm Bofors; two single mountings on the forward superstructure, and two twin mountings on the aft superstructure. Four 0.5-inch (13 mm) Browning machine guns were carried for point defence. For anti-submarine warfare, a Limbo anti-submarine mortar was carried on the aft deck, offset to port. Vampire was fitted with a Type 170 attack sonar, a Type 174 search sonar, and a Type 185 submarine detection sonar. The fire control directors were two WM22 units. The long range air warning radar was an LW-02, and an 8GR-301A surface search and navigation radar was installed. cheers Pat
  22. Hi folks, My next project will be the HMAS Vampire based on a 1:350 #D printed model from Bogeys Bits (via Shapeways). I served a very enjoyable 2.5 years in this ship and it will be a joy building this model of her as it will rekindle many good memories. This photo is from the official RAN website. This log is being started now but no serious work will begin before mid-2016 while I research, acquire detail parts etc and get to grips with working with this material. This is my first non-wood build so I will be learning a lot as I go. In the meantime I will have to devote some serious time to my long-suffering Endeavour (if I don’t, the Admiral will have some stern words ). Introduction Hull Main deck B Deck (forward lower superstructure) X Deck (after lower superstructure) Bridge and GDP (Gun Direction Platform) Main Mast Funnel Radar Superstructure Boats and Davits Main Armament Secondary Armament Cheers Pat
×
×
  • Create New...