-
Posts
3,445 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by yvesvidal
-
Great start PJ. I love all the research you did on that legendary vessel, in your first post. Also, Artesania Latina kit is in the scale of 1/65 which is the standard scale for a lot of period ships, if you ever decide to build a small collection of them. I will be following with a lot of interest. Yves
-
Both frames have been puttied (to a certain extent) and tubes filed to make them look like round steel tubes. Finally, everything is primed in light gray, with automotive primer. Below is a picture of the real frame from a HONDA CB750 1974. The picture is from a famous Auction site, someone selling a complete frame: The main thing that jumps to your attention are the two re-enforcement bars located under the fuel tank. These are missing from both kits. However, they do exist on the HELLER kit (see previous post). Below is the frame, from the HONDA spare parts manual. Most likely, this is a newer frame, possibly found on the latest CB750 Four models (1974 and newer). On the MPC kit, it is not possible to add them as the underside shell of the fuel cell, matches very closely the tubular upper spine of the frame. On the Tamiya kit, it could be done as the fuel cell matches the real tank and allows for these bars to be installed. However, I think that if Tamiya did not depict them, it is because they have modeled the 1969-70 early model of the CB750, which probably did not have these two bars. I suspect these bars were added later on, to increase the stiffness of the frame and the road handling. My understanding is that the Tamiya kit depicts the early CB750, as is proven by the ignition system of the kit. The MPC kit having been issued in 1971, may also have taken the same approach. Simple regret on the Tamiya kit: I wish they had stamped the CB750 Serial number on the collar of the front fork. It is something that could be done by hand and would be visible, once the model is completed. Yves
-
The copper edges bring that touch of antique, that goes so well with the craft. Well done. Lovely collection by the way..... Yves
-
What a beautiful model. Eric Tabarly is probably smiling with gratitude and joy, looking at your gorgeous model, from the other side. Yves
- 70 replies
-
- pen duick
- artesania latina
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Scalemates is completely wrong on this one. Below are two pictures taken from the Super-Hobby site, depicting the Heller kit. You can see that the Heller kit is built like the Tamiya kit, whereas the MPC takes a lot of liberties with the accuracy. Just compare the Heller sprues with the previous pictures I posted before. I still believe the Heller kit is vastly superior: Yves
-
Let's move to the chassis of both bikes. Here again, Tamiya presents a fabulous chassis with a great assembly, similar to the real one. We are just missing the soldering rods and the torch. MPC on the other hand is really simplified, even for a 1/8 scale model. You can tell that the kit is old, was never re-tooled and as far as I can remember, the HELLER kit was more detailed and close to reality. First the rear arm: exquisite of details on the Tamiya model, with adjustable wheel holders and soldering lips. MPC, on the other hand, ultra simplified and vaguely correct. The main frame: There is a lot of work to finish up the frames with putty and fine sanding to make these tubes round. Not so bad on the Tamiya, but the MPC will require some TLC. Fortunately, I have that new Acrylic Putty (Vallejo) recommended by CDW. It is going to come handy, here. On the Tamiya kit, everything is replicated with exquisite details: look at these solder marks..... It is just amazing for a kit created in 1971. Yves
-
A quick update on the conning tower. I just finished cutting and filing three pieces of clear cylinders, from the transparent sprue. They are then painted clear green, clear red and clear yellow, using Tamiya paints. Let's verify that it works electrically: Intensity of the lights will be adjusted when the conning tower is glued to the hull. Yves
-
Yes, it is a bit easier but I am glad I finished the front wheel. Once you get the pace, it goes relatively smoothly. The trick is to be organized and to do one spoke at a time. For the MPC model at 1/8, I did not replace the spokes.... I do not know how this Japanese Kinishi Karube does it, but I am not able (or willing) to spend so much time perfecting a plastic scale model. So, here is the process: Both sides done, all chrome paint removed, ready for gluing: Details of the insect pins used for that model: Gluing phase. You need a lot of clamps, as there is a tremendous pressure for both sides of the wheel to split: Plastic glue with a layer of CA glue to secure the whole thing. Let it dry for a few hours. Ready for mounting the tire: And the front wheels finished: the MPC model is a lot easier to put together.... Re-spoking is a lot of work, but I believe that the end result is worth it. Notice the difference of tires: Tamiya has Bridgestone whereas MPC proposes Good Year. Tamiya tire is 3.25 x 19 and MPC tire is 3.75 x 19. Slightly wider on MPC and their "9" looks like a "0". Yves
-
And the craziness starts.... On the Tamiya kit, the wheels are very nicely molded, but these spokes chrome plated and touching each others, are not exactly realistic. So, I jumped in and decided to replace all the plastic spokes with insect pins. I purchased the larger size (#5) which at the scale of 1/6 are very close to the diameter of the prototype spokes. It is a very tedious job and I am replacing one spoke at a time, to keep the wheels round and concentric. The pins I have are of the perfect length and once bent, fit without any additional cutting.... a bit of luck. The end result is not too bad and you can compare the kit wheel and the reworked wheel: I did not install the small brass pieces used to adjust the tension of the spokes. I could not find any tube or insulating material small enough to do a good job. In addition, the color would probably not match and the size of these parts is really so tiny that I decided to skip them, completely. The difference in rigidity of the wheel flange is amazing. Where the plastic flange can be bent easily, the metal spokes are very sturdy and solid. Here you can compare how the spokes are behaving: quite a contrast!! Plastic above, stainless steel below: Other side, showing how this is all put together: The idea of re-wiring (or re-spoking) the wheels came from what I consider to be the best motorcycles kits builder in the world: Kinishi Karube. His site can be reached at: http://kimshouse7015.com/ Yves
-
Folks, This is a crazy idea, but I have to try it: Build two models of the same Vehicle, but at different scales. I have also decided to not build another war machine (for the time being) as the planet absolutely needs a wind of peace, harmony and balance. I am a fanatic about Motorcycles and started riding at the age of 13 years old (legal age in France was 14) using mopeds from friends. At the age of 14, I got my first little motorcycle, a DERBI 50 cc with a gearbox with 3 speeds controlled by the foot. The gear patterns were reversed from the Japanese motorcycles and what was to become the standard, but the idea was there. I still have that DERBI bike and moved to a Suzuki 125 GT, at the age of 17. All my youth was spent admiring these big machines such as HONDA CB750, CB550K, LAVERDA, Moto Guzzi V7, Suzuki and other Kawazaki Mach 2 and 3 (the widowmakers) and smaller motorcycles such as the Yamaha, Honda CB125 K4 and many more. A large chunk of my life would then be spent without owning any motorcycle but the urge was always there. In 2001, I purchased a BMW R1100S that I still have today and ride occasionally (that model was never reproduced in scale model, unfortunately). One of my favorite bikes and one that truly revolutionized the world of motorcycles, was the HONDA CB750 Four introduced in 1969 to the world. Much has been said about this bike but I never had a chance to ride it, unfortunately. I did ride the CB 550K and the CBX 1000 with six cylinders in line, though. These were two incredible bikes, especially the CBX with its fantastic power, speed and accelerations. When the CB750 Four K0 came out, it was immediately embraced as a cult bike and many famous people in Europe (and elsewhere) were seen riding it. Here is an example of French singer Francoise Hardy, riding her CB750 in the streets of Paris: Back to the scale models, after this brief introduction of the fantastic HONDA CB750 Four. I built the HELLER Honda CB750 (1/8) in 1971 when that model came up on the French market. I was not even a teenager at that point and my passion for motorcycles was already intense. HELLER was proposing a large choice of models, all in the scale of 1/8: Nortons, BMW, Laverda, Honda, Kawazaki, Yamaha and a few others. The HELLER model was fantastic and very realistic and seems different from the MPC model that I will be trying to build. I compared the sprues of the HELLER and the MPC kits, and they are vastly different although at the same scale. First the TAMIYA kit at 1/6th, which is a classic and has been available for a very long time: The kit I bought on E-Bay long time ago, is very old and the decals are damaged due to their ages. All the other parts (rubber mostly) are still in very good shape and flexible. I contacted TAMIYA USA who offered to sell me another set of decals as soon as the stupid confinement is over. For the scale of 1/8, I could not get an HELLER kit at a decent price and thus fell back on the MPC kit. Both Tamiya and MPC are depicting the original K0 version of the CB750, with its sleek air box and its lack of the small lights dashboard, available on later model K1 to K4 as well as the later CB 550K bike. As indicated before, I am going to try to build the two kits at the same time. I have never done that before and I honestly think it is crazy. However, it will be interesting to compare the excellent and extremely detailed Tamiya kit with the more common and affordable MPC kit and appreciate the different sizes of the parts and sub-assemblies. Progress will be slow as I still have to finish my submarine. Yves
-
Yeah!!! Thank you for presenting this rare model. Yves
-
Amazing realism Greg. This is just getting better and better with each model. Along the lines of Borodino, how about something like these pictures (taken from Pinterest): Or a little diorama like this one below: Seriously, I love your work. It is splendid. Yves
-
Well, I use a small white cotton rag to suck extra CA glue. Yes, works very well, and speeds up the gluing process. Yves
-
Kevin, I think you took the right decision. I would have hated seeing that beautiful hull, cut. Yves
- 337 replies
-
- finished
- mountfleet models
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.