Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    13,092
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. So, you winged your wing transom? No-one will know. The transoms look very nice indeed, although, were it me, I'd leave them a little full for final fairing when all is assembled. Those are very sweet joints. No idea? I don't think so!
  2. Kits are generally designed so that a minimal number of hand tools are needed. Here is a typical example: https://modelexpo-online.com/assets/images/MS1471 Norwegian Sailing Pram instructions rev 3-29-21.pdf Pages 40 to 43.
  3. Well, Yarmouth, 1745 has original standing rigging (5 shrouds a side!), but most NMM models have been re-rigged over time. Others of the 60 to 74 gun size all seem to have 5 a side as well. Draw what conclusions you may.
  4. Interesting, Alan. I thought that this might be a typo, but, on checking the other tables in Steel, I see that all ships down to 64-gun size have 4 'extra' deadeyes and four shroud pairs. The 64 has 2 extras and rates below do no have any excess deadeyes. The main top for a 74 shows an outline of the top only and the 36-gun ship shows four slots a side (Plate 5, Volume I).
  5. I'm always a little suspicious of the accuracy of the AOTS series! I believe that Longridge shows scooped battens.
  6. A magnificent piece of music, JD! I've had the privilege of singing it (chorus!) a few years back. But I digress.... Carving at such small scale is tough. Do you have good, directional light to work by, Mark? That alone can make a huge difference. A few years ago I invested in a set of miniature carving tools from Mihail Kirsanov. It improved my success rate considerably.
  7. Nice going. It's amazing how roomy these tops were. Heaving them into place must have been quite an affair. The radiating battens usually have a 'scooped' contour. I assume these have yet to be shaped?
  8. For anyone still manually drafting, this is a bargain! I paid far more for my own almost complete set many years ago.
  9. I've seen draughts where the ends of a breast hook come through a deck, but not a sleeper. It's possible that as a merchant ship Discovery was not fitted with sleepers or that the aft ends of the sleepers actually came up through the deck. Sometimes only a Time Machine will give the definitive answer. In the absence of one, you need to be master shipwright and decide.
  10. You'll find that different authors have different preferences. Choose your poison! You are master shipwright in your own yard.
  11. Nice progress. However, other builders have found that seasonal wood expansion and contraction can distort the hull. This can be prevented by leaving very small gaps between the fillings and frames every few frames rather than packing them all in tightly.
  12. We are all nervous when trying a new thing or technique for the first time. I was terrified of silver soldering until I actually did it. It really wasn't so bad. Just remember not to touch metal until it's good and cool! Soon you won't think about it twice when annealing.
  13. There could be a sliding cover. However, hinged covers were often made in two halves, not a single piece as in the Marquandt illustration. Open, they took up less real estate and each half was, well, half the weight to lift. Harriet's sliding cover, 1843 (Royal Museums Greenwich) Of course, the cover could simply be grating for ventilation and a solid cover for heavy weather. The indication of the rabbet in the coaming suggests that this was the likely arrangement in this case. The 'extra' coaming on the sheer and profile that you show might be for a sliding cover. I am confused as deck plan says 'as fitted' and the sheer and profile 'as taken off' on the same date. Did the draftsman simply forget to add the aft extension, or was it fitted after the deck plan was drawn up?
  14. I understand your position on this. You need to be happy and satisfied with your work, however good it may appear to others. Looking forward to your second start.
  15. The model in question was Albertic, and Michael did an excellent job.
  16. I'm sorry that you are not happy with your work so far. It looks to be of very high quality to my eye. What exactly is unsatisfactory?
  17. In the 1920's, fish and animal based glues were common. Builders' models used various species of pine for the hulls, usually of hollow laminated form. Details were fabricated from brass (often electroplated) and so-called Bermuda boxwood (Castello) or European box. Paints were solvent-based and lacquer and shellac often used for finishes. I'm curious as to the state of the model that you are looking to conserve. Are you able to give more details or photos?
  18. No, don't give up, You have to be specific to get a specific answer. So: 1) Date or date range 2) Nationality (don't assume we know!) 3) In the case of a doorway, where in the vessel? The answer will be different if it's in the hold/platforms, a gun deck or weather deck. The more defined the question, the better the responses will be.
×
×
  • Create New...