Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    12,938
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. The models may have omitted the rabbetted fashion piece as it is a pain to make (I know this from experience!) It involves a continuously changing rabbet angle on the fore side, and another for the transom planks aft. I'm sure that the real ships were fitted this way, as exposed end grain wood deteriorates rapidly when exposed.
  2. ClipperFan: the usual underlay (again, for naval vessels) was tarred felt.
  3. It appears that merchant practice in coppering (Muntz as you point out) differed from that used by the navy.
  4. Feather out? Do you mean make gains until the planks are flush with each other into the rabbet? If so, that is the correct way it was done. Also, there was a rabbet in the fashion piece to protect the plank ends from rot.
  5. It was common practice (in naval dockyards, at least) to launch, check for any leaky seams, drydock, seal, then copper the bottom. Otherwise it would be harder to detect the source of water ingress and a pain to remove the copper to caulk the offending seam(s.)
  6. You will have as many varying opinions as replies here! I've used all the usual makes mentioned and they are all fine. However, for ease of cleaning and no easily damaged long needles, you might consider Aztek as an alternative.
  7. Hmm. Gives new meaning to the expression 'knights errant'. Looking very good now.
  8. Now you know the meaning of the word 'druxey': rotten to the core. It is a form of wood rot found in the shipyard: spongy white veins inside logs.
  9. Are you reeving the laniard in the correct direction or is your line not 'hardened'?
  10. I always thought canaries were yellow, not salmon colored! (Another 'druxey correction')? Seriously, I'm very flattered.
  11. We await the results of the Museum's findings!
  12. Seems like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. None of my masts and spars have seen a lathe. It is not difficult to start with square stock marked out (don't need a four jaw chuck!), cut it eight-square except fo the square sections, then round off the parts that need it, using strips of sandpaper back and forth until the 'flats' just disappear. You don't need a lathe with a long bed ($$$), 4 jaw chuck ($$), steady ($$), filing rest ($$) or other paraphernalia. Just pencil and rule, sharp chisel and sandpaper. There; I just saved you a ton of money!
  13. Does look like rotating ball joints. I've not seen those before. It would be an advantage to point them down so any overflow would not go onto the deck.
  14. Superb work as usual, Gary. Shrek-like fingers? Watchmaker's tweezers are the answer.
  15. The second layer for the spirketting is a kit simplification, as is the waterway and double planking as sketched by John.
  16. Welcome. You are already well versed in modelmaking!
  17. Take or send these images either to National Museums Scotland or the British Museum.
  18. Welcome to the Canuck contingent here!
  19. Well, back on topic. It was a fun diversion, though! I'm sure that the full-length columns will be less likely to collapse than the originals, so perhaps it was a fortunate accident. Glad you could save the decorative painted part of the xylokastra. Stupid question: couldn't you find thread in the color you needed without having to make the witches' brew of dye?
×
×
  • Create New...