-
Posts
13,136 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by druxey
-
-
At miniature scales 'cheats' to fool the eye are necessary. Perhaps at least try some of the suggested methods that the experts use to see if you can get a result that pleases you.
- Doreltomin, mtaylor, Gregory and 1 other
-
4
-
-
First, you've done a very neat and workmanlike job of your first wooden model build. Well done!
Clamping parts on a model where nothing is square is always a challenge in this hobby. Your solution worked well - not one I've seen before. As you work your way through more models, problem solving is half the challenge and fun!
- Ryland Craze, SiriusVoyager and tmj
-
3
-
Too thin for wood poles: those appear to be lines (ropes).
- Keith Black and mtaylor
-
2
-
Nice! It's amazing with accurate mark-out and the correct hand tool what one can accomplish.
- Mike Y, mtaylor, Stuntflyer and 1 other
-
4
-
Beautiful work, as always!
- Valeriy V, Keith Black, FriedClams and 2 others
-
5
-
Is that a pair, but one mounted the wrong way around?
- Old Collingwood, mtaylor and Canute
-
3
-
Don't be too hard on yourself, Mike. These parts look deceptively easy, but they are not - as you've discovered.
- Stuntflyer, mtaylor and Mike Y
-
2
-
1
-
What would be the rise and tread of those steps, Rich? Also, how does that upper rail look in plan view? Does it extend in a straight fore and aft line, or is it cranked?
-
My apologies for confusing the issue of the depth of keel.
-
Excellent result. You now only need a ship to attach it to.
- FriedClams, Glen McGuire and ClipperFan
-
1
-
2
-
Rich: re post #164, I took this quote from post #119, first page of the manuscript at the top.
-
Ah! "...with the shoe moulds 46 inches..." that/those are the false keel(s). So, 46 - 32 = 14". Not unreasonable to have a double false keel in 7" thicknesses.
-
I read that at 16" wide (sided). Two pieces: upper 20" high (moulded) and the lower 12"high. Total 32".
-
For short radiused curves, perhaps two layers of 1/64" aircraft ply with the outer grain direction vertical?
- mtaylor, FriedClams, Ian_Grant and 3 others
-
6
-
Well done so far. I often find I dread certain making certain parts because I over-think the process. When it comes to actually making them, it usually goes better than I expected. Sounds like that was the case with your cast toptimbers.
Enjoy your vacation and safe travels!
- mtaylor, Thukydides, davec and 3 others
-
6
-
No fingerprints? The perfect crime awaits!
-
The font you picture (post #982)is a modern late 19th/20th century one. It is quite unlike that used in the 18th century.
The letter have thick and thin strokes, as well as serifs (the triangular pointy bits). Bold san serif lettering will detract from your lovely model. If you can't imitate the style, perhaps omit the name altogether?
- Ryland Craze and mtaylor
-
2
-
For a ship of her size, 30" seems entirely plausible.
-
Bienvenue ici, Michel!
- Keith Black and mtaylor
-
2
-
-
-
Sliding doors make sense, I think. Just an uninformed opinion.
- ClipperFan and FriedClams
-
2
-
New member. Boatmaking and modelbuilding solo for 20 years. Unaware of this site till now!
in New member Introductions
Posted
Welcome aboard - or should one say, welcome home?