Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    13,001
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. Siggi: There's always a possibility that I could be wrong. If I am, I'm ready to admit it! However, (I've written a PM to Mark) I have a strong argument for my point of view. We'll see....
  2. Dear Mark, As we seem to be taking over Siggi's thread, I'll PM you. However, thank you for your thoughtful response!
  3. A happy and healthy New Year to you indeed, Doris, and to all those who follow your builds!
  4. Mark P: I'm interested as to why you think that the stop was not a separate piece when Steel spec's it as such. (He does not call for a rebate to be cut into the frame.) My reasoning for the frames being 1" greater sided on the sides of the ports is for extra strength when driving and fixing the ringbolts for the breeching and gun tackle.
  5. Interesting. I believe that access to the magazine was by a passage with two separate doors that opened outward. This was a precaution against accidental sparks or detonation from outside blowing in. The doors would blow shut in such an event. Direct access from above via a companion ladder would be very dangerous!
  6. Not quite, Siggi. The stop is attached to the frame, the frame is not rabbetted.
  7. Thank you, Mark. Since I first read Longridge back in 1955, I'd always wondered what the 'Midget Universal' was like! Your post and link made me smile this morning. Thank you!
  8. Impressive at all scales! I imagine the car runs beautifully as well.
  9. Siggi: in the tables, Folio XXV and XXVI, it states: Port lids. - Every gun deck port to be fitted with a substantial lid made of English oak - Stops of the ports not less than (measurement in table 3 1/2" or 3". Well seasoned linings fitted into the stops (measurement in table thickness 1 1/4" to 1") Fitted into the stops implies that the linings overlap, not abut, the stops. I've certainly shown this - rightly or wrongly - in my own models.
  10. 'Cant frames' in English. Those look very nicely made. Only a few more needed!
  11. Aiee! That is a very daunting task to complete successfully. Good on you, Dan.
  12. A bridle port would certainly need a lid: the ship would be very wet otherwise!
  13. A very interesting form of construction, nicely executed as usual, Dick.
  14. There are still examples of end-grain 'pavers' seen in Europe.
  15. Those look very challenging! I hope one can see them when the model is completed. Merry Christmas down under, Dan!
  16. Your present non-unravelling line is fine. If I wanted unravelling line, I'd buy Morope! In terms of commercial business, would it keep your costs down by packaging line in longer lengths, therefore lessen time spent handling many small quantities?
  17. And a happy festive season to you also, Pat!
  18. And a happy and healthy New Year ahead for you, Frank!
  19. Well, obviously the limit is because of the tools available, not the skill of the model-maker! Perhaps Santa will be kind....
  20. Gunshot proof, no; but weather/waterproof, yes! Certainly Steel (British, 1805) describes the rabbeted style of port lid clearly. Either way, you are building a very lovely model.
  21. I like to draft on frosted Mylar sheet: it doesn't expand and contract like paper.
  22. I suppose a museum expert in fabric conservation might be the right person to ask, Johann. Frohe Weihnachten!
×
×
  • Create New...