Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    12,522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. Part of the problem both of you gentlemen may be facing is relying too much on station sections so far aft. You can'r assume their accuracy here. The contours change very rapidly as seen in vertical section. I'd rely far more on waterlines (aka transom shapes), buttock lines and proof diagonals to fair things up.
  2. Ha! I think he's almost got it. There appears to be a small suspect area remaining just below the corner of the wing transom. The outermost buttock line looks as if the bend there is a bit too sharp. You might want to review that. Full marks for persistence, Alan.
  3. That is an interesting question! Would the three planks have been put together with tongue-and-groove joints? If not, then your suggestion makes sense. It would make more sense if the battens ran next to the frame. Then the scuttle would run smoothly without twisting.
  4. Yes, Mike, the second volume is a continuation from Volume I to the completion of the hull and deck fittings. Volume III is a photo-essay showing Greg Herbert's excellent build of a Swan class model hull. Volume IV covers the masts, yards and rigging, including rigging and belaying plans.
  5. Then either the draftsman forgot to draw the openings on the deck plan or the deck planks are removable. That the planks are moveable is less likely, as the beams would be rebated to take the plank ends. I think that those two pairs of short lines in the deck plank between the beams show moveable square covers.
  6. Is there either a scuttle in one of the bulkheads, or do those short lines in the deck above indicate small hatch openings?
  7. AOTS series often contain errors, unfortunately. The planking pattern you show is one example. The second version is correct. If the first layout were actually used, once one butt gave way, the rest would follow like a zipper. (This particularly applies to hull planking). The second, staggered pattern minimizes this possibility and is much stronger.
  8. I'm sorry also to read of your friends' passings. In troubled times, model making is good therapy. Congratulations on your children's successes, though.
  9. Very clever adaptation of conventional photo-etching, Don! I wonder how small you can go using this process. Have you experimented with that?
  10. If you haven't already done so, look at dealing with a bluff bow planking job as seen in David Antscherl's planking tutorial on this site.
  11. A Spanish windlass arrangement, perhaps? It would have been the simplest method for applying torque to the hypozomata.
  12. You need a tissue that will stand up to wetting without disintegrating. Also, shiny would be distracting, I think.
  13. You figurehead might look like Kermit to you, Omega, but at that scale the overall effect or impression is what matters. In this case, the effect looks very good.
  14. Good things do take time, you know! Looks like you are on your way, Newbee.
  15. Holly tones down nicely after a few years. Is that a possible compromise? Some 18th century models' cabins were painted with in a pale eau-de-nil green or light blue.
  16. Ah! A great collective noun is suggested by the photo of your clamps clamping the deck clamp (is that clear?): 'a grip of clamps'. Thank you, Mark! Those deck clamps look great as well.
  17. Terrific work, as usual, Ed! Would marking, say, the top timber height of every third or fourth toptimber and running a light batten to get the intermediate ones have been a option? I'm curious as to why you used the height gauge to measure every last one.
  18. No. However, a larger scale mock-up with modelied clay sculptures should help you figure out how to carve them in wood. I've found that process to be helpful on other models, an example of which is attached.
  19. Sorry about your early snowfall, Michael. Fire up that wood stove! Great way to use up your scrap wood....
×
×
  • Create New...