druxey

Knice knurls!

Perhaps this analysis is overkill. Wood expands and contracts with humidity levels. So, were you to 'mike' the samples on another day, your readings will probably differ. You can't compare wood to, say, metal.

Seems a pity to cover all those carlings and ledges.... Beautiful work, Lee.

Just catching up on your progress, John. Nice work; she's looking really good.

A slightly belated happy anniversary and many more, Michael and Judy! Manifold and carb are looking great.

Thanks for the comprehensive reply, E&T. I was thinking only of underwater streamlining. It's nice to know that, in this case, all you need do is 'wait and see'!

Terrific update, E & T. Question: would not the reinforcing straps have been inset flush to the surface of the wooden elements?

Perhaps another source for earlier design (to add to your list, Wayne) is from the so-called "Newton Manuscript': a transcription by Sir Isaac Newton of a treatise c.1600. This gives instructions for designing ships, both naval and merchant. It is given in its entirety in an article in Mariners' Mirror, 1994, Volume 80, No.1. The 67 'Propositions' given describe how to design a ship.

Neat story so far. Gute gesundheit, Wefalck! Get well soon.

Congratulations for arriving at this point in the build, Ed. She looks terrific.

Yes, I checked that Lee melting pot out on line. As it will achieve a temperature that melts lead-free pewter, that's a great solution if one is doing a quantity of casting work which, for a 74, is certainly the case! Of course, you will now be deluged with requests from others to cast cannon for them....

Well done, Mark. That melting set-up you have looks interesting. Much more sophisticated than mine: I use rubber bands rather than clamps, and just an iron ladle!

Usual measurement quoted was 3' 0" - whatever that converts to in metric!

Those are the Rolls Royce of ducks, Michael! No plain cast lead for you.

I seem to recall that there was a book on British fishing boats and coastal craft with plans and photos. Is that a source of information for you?

F.H. Chapman, The First Naval Architect and his Work, by Daniel G. Harris Conway Maritime Press, 1989, ISBN0-87021-052-1 This book, published some years ago, is an appreciation of the life and work of the famed designer Frederick Chapman. Most well-known for his book Architectura Navalis Mercatoria, published in facsimile (various editions), what is not so well-known is his other many achievements over a very long and productive life. Although British, he spent most of his professional career in Sweden and designed many successful vessels for the Swedish Navy. He was one of the first naval architects to use scientific methods to produce his designs, rather than the older empirical or trial-and-error methods. Some of these designs, such as Vasa, were disastrous. He calculated metacenters and centers of gravity, as well as conducted water tank experiments with different shaped bodies. His decorative work designs show that he was not only of a scientific but also artistic turn of mind. His was also a very inquiring mind. The book is profusely illustrated with draughts designed by Chapman. It covers the years 1760 to 1808 in detail and shows Chapman’s hand not only in design but shipyard management, dockyard building design and dealing with the politics and personalities of the day. There are numerous appendices, one of which may be of particular interest to 18th century British ship model-makers. It is a facsimile copy of Chapman’s extensive notes and diagrams on the building and launching of a British 50-gun ship. Most, if not all of the scantlings are given. Although undated, it was probably written in around 1760. All in all, a very readable account of a remarkable and very capable man. Highly recommended.

Brilliant idea: old hex keys for hex stock! The manifold looks great, Michael.

Nice model: those are beautifully made blocks. It must have been kept in poor conditions if those sails are only 30 years old. Have fun working on her.

Re-scaling plans always involves risk of distortion. If you plan on a 1:48 model, you are better off getting the larger plan set. Besides, there will be the additional cost of scanning and printing at the new size. What scale are you considering, anyway?

This is fascinating reading. I wish I were qualified to comment! Best wishes as you pursue this topic, Helmut, and three cheers for brain plasticity, which I know a little more about!

I agree with Greg: I used to sand down to 400 grit, but decided that it was a bit excessive.

I can only speculate, but perhaps some builders delay the external planking is because they are scared of its complexity.

Looking terrific, Michael.

Tony: it's not the mast, but the yard (or yards) that can be a'cockbill. This means that one yard arm is tipped lower than the other, which is raised, of course. At one time, ships' yards were tilted alternately (with the sails furled) as a mark of respect when a ranking officer had died.

As a general rule, serving was only applied (over worming and parcelling) where there was the possibility of chafing. The foremost shroud could get rubbed by the sail and the shrouds, where they pass around the mast head, would also be served. Apparently, on some ships, the captain or commander disliked served strops because it would hide signs of deterioration of the line or its splice. So, it's really model makers' choice!