-
Posts
1,841 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by AJohnson
-
Sea Harrier FRS1 by AJohnson - FINISHED - Airfix - 1:72
AJohnson replied to AJohnson's topic in Non-ship/categorised builds
I know the one! I built one also as part of a “group build” when in the Air Cadets as a kid. We mocked up HMS Hermes on a table top and added our Harrier builds. - Happy days 😄 -
Evening all, Last of the plastic aircraft builds I want to finish up before I go back in to the "Boat" yard! ⛵ I did a search and this fine build by @Old Collingwood is the only other Sea harrier I can find here. But this is only a tiddler at 1/72 so it won't be as complicated a build and I am doing it out of the box without "bought-in" additions. I intend to do it as FRS1 - XZ451; one of the kit options. This aircraft was delivered in 1979 and initially served in 700A flight (see second picture, this is how I intend to finish the model), before being transferred to 899 NAS in 1981 sporting codes "100" & "VL". It took part in the Falklands War and was transferred to 801 NAS onboard HMS Invincible. During the conflict it shot down a C-130H Hercules, this has caused some controversy in some quarters since as Commander Nigel "Sharkey" Ward expended two AIM-9L Sidewinder missiles and 240 rounds of 30mm cannon fire into it to bring it down. ZX451 itself came to grief in 1989 after mechanical failures and crashed into the Mediterranean sea off Sardinia (pilot ejected). Hope this log of interest to some of you.
-
Looking very tidy Mike, good tip to watch out for the backstays when I eventually get around to my “Snake”
- 109 replies
-
- snake
- caldercraft
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thank you @Old Collingwood, @king derelict, @Edwardkenway, @Canute & @CDW for your kind words! Yes, it is interesting to compare a Lancaster & Mosquito for size and to think they both could carry the 4,000lb "Cookie"! Okay so not the 8,000lb "Cookie", or 12,000lb "Tallboy", or 22,000lb "Grand Slam", but you get the idea, for the "Light Bomber" category the Mossie was THE benchmark for speed, range and payload. I can only finish off by quoting a Nazi! (😲 - I know, not expecting that were you, but it is the finest compliment to the "Wooden Wonder" I know of...) “In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war is over I’m going to buy a British radio set – then at least I’ll own something that has always worked." – Hermann Göring, 1943
-
Hi Edward, For a fuzzy edge, as I don’t have the requisite airbrush skills, I would still mask, but lift the paper mask off the surface by use of small blobs of blu-tac to allow some under spray. You’d have to experiment a little to find the height of mask you need for a given “fuzz”. Is this kit the the old Matchbox one, rebranded? nice work!
-
Yes agreed, the Green/Grey is very muted, almost "Coldwar" modern in look. Colourcoats do put a lot of research into their paints (many warship ones also.) So, fairly confident I'm in safe hands on that score; initially I thought the Grey looked too "blue", but it looks close to the few colour photos I have seen. Green/Brown is also my favourite, I'll post up some pictures of this one next to my "Phantom of the Rhur" Lanc. I did a couple of years ago when finished.
-
Now that is wonderful, lovely scene, very atmospheric. 👏
-
Last update I think before the big reveal. Enamel "Bomber black" from Colourcoats applied, it has a semi-satin type finish which is fine as the next job is a gloss coat for the decals. So after the gloss coat, all that is needed are the decals, adding the undercarriage and bomb bay doors and finally the props. I will do some weathering, mostly the "chalky" looking staining from the exhausts on the black, perhaps highlight a few panels lines around the engines, but not much more. Certainly no need to add "metal" chips to this one! 😁 (well perhaps the odd one on the metal engine cowls / radiator panels....) Then a final flat coat. Not sure, I think I prefer the "look" of a Mosquito in Daylight camouflage, the black disguises her lines a bit - shock! - do you think that was the purpose for black night bombers? 🤔 😂 Thanks all again for the interest, feedback and comments on this build, who knew - one of the best "aircraft" forums is on "Model SHIP World"! 👍
-
As an aside the factory picture of the Lancasters also shows they were “freehand” painted, each is slightly different than the other, so just shows research is your friend if you are after a particular aircraft to model. You can tell these are later mark Lancaster as there are no small oval fuselage windows. So maybe by the time these ones were being built the “mask to spray” or even “mask to chalk line” the airframe were not used at least in this factory. But given the average lifespan of a Lancaster was about 20 missions, it is a wonder they got a lick of paint at all!
-
Here is a picture of some clearly spray-painted Lancasters in the factory, you can just make out the "fuzz", but try that at 1/72 and it will be very hard to see as Javlin says. All down to research on a particular A/C. or personal preference, after all these are our models, me personally I don't like "fuzz" on my clothes or my models! 🙂
-
Hi Javlin Thanks & @Egilman & @Canute for the kind words. Regarding the "fuzzy" v "hard" demarcation of the camouflage, I discussed this in my Beaufort build not long ago. Yes scale has a great deal to do with it, but also (with the caveat there was huge variation) the full-size aircraft were also sometimes painted in this manner with masks. So unless doing something 1/24 scale and bigger, or modelling something that actually was sprayed with a large "fuzzy" width in real life, some form of masking on model camo. is the only option really. Besides this is all academic really, as my "freehand" airbrushing is not up to doing anything without a mask"! 😆 The black underbelly will be done today, more updates soon! Thanks all.
-
Painting update, but first a school-boy error to confess! 🤭 Whilst going over the kit and doing last minute polishing and filing around the canopy frame with thin putty I noticed I had glued the horizontal stabilisers on upside down! 🤣 Not too bad to fix, they are almost identical surfaces but for two circular access panels that should have been underneath and two rectangular raised ones that needed to be on top. So needed to fill one pair and made the other pair with thin plastic card, there nothing to see move along.... 😉 Painting was fairly straight forward, Colourcoats Enamels doing the trick again without drama. This all needs to harden off for a day, so I can mask it all for the bomber black coat. Until next time! 👋
-
Well we are about ready for painting, undercoat done, final inspection, fine rubbing down and the addition of tail aerial to do; I would be happier leaving that off until the end, but the way the part fixes to the tail fin means it might spoil the paint finish, so I will have to be careful! 😬 The hardest part of the build has actually been the canopy. It has alternate parts for the side window panels, so you can have the "blown/bulged" B.XVI versions or the "blister" alternative - similar to the ones on the Lancaster's canopy. (This indicates for those who might be interested, Airfix might be intending to do another version of the Mossie, probably a Photo recon. bird, which might interest US members as a few USAF units used the Mosquito in that role.) Anyways these little side panels have been an absolute B@&^%£! to fit satisfactorily. 🙄 Being safe I used canopy glue to avoid fogging, but this would just not pull together the main canopy to these small panels and keep their shape and twice the assembly sprung apart. (I think the main canopy is slightly bent upwards away from the seating on the fuselage.) So with a deep breath, plenty of magnification and lighting I fixed them with medium C-A used very carefully with an applicator tip. Blowing on the parts like an asthmatic 🌬️to keep the air moving to avoid the dreaded fogging. Upshot I think it is all still clear, though I will probably find later my masking hasn't worked and I now have a green canopy! 😂 Next update Cammo time! 😁 thanks for looking in and the likes. 👍
-
Hello everyone, I've been away from this little project for a bit, working getting in the way, shouldn't complain - it pays the bills! 🙂 So just a small update, have managed this week to finish off a few of the smaller parts, bombs, undercarriage and props ready for attachment at the end of the built. Also masked the clear parts ready for first undercoat.
-
F-86F-30 Sabre by Egilman - Kinetic - 1/32nd scale
AJohnson replied to Egilman's topic in Non-ship/categorised builds
Totally agreed, I had two in my stash. I still get the bug to do a Grey/white USN/Marines one! 😁 Years ago I did the Tamiya 1/32 E and a 1/72 Royal Navy version. -
Don't do it! I said that months ago with my "Nisha" 🤐 Your Erycina is looking very smart, would be a shame for you to abandon her at just the same stage I did.... (I will be back to it next month I think)
- 88 replies
-
- Erycina
- Vanguard Models
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.