Jump to content

NAIAD 1797 by Bitao - 1:60


Recommended Posts

Hello Bitao,

 

I ordered the Naiade books last night. I just read your thread carefully and I bookmarked it on my pc! As much for the text as for the images and the philosophical side to adopt to model this journal is extraordinary.

Good continuation on your model. 😉

Friendly, health and peace for all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your love and praise. In order to show more detail, I spent some time taking photos and slowing down the process. Also in order to enjoy the process in their own production rather than make themselves very tired. The goal that was supposed to be accomplished by the end of this month will certainly not be met, so let's just go with the flow. .^_^

 

533.JPG.f965fed7c6af9264b592c968e5efbb02.JPG

 

 

 

534.JPG.7a40c569d92bc2e63a3b06bc5fca3451.JPG

 

 

535.JPG.ae886538a881984fe3aec6365cd914f2.JPG

 

 

 

536.JPG.a22b66551f84c0fc0d48b9b11964f1c9.JPG

 

 

 

537.JPG.3b3fb189fbd72c1169d587767b3ac3de.JPG

 

 

 

539.JPG.03239be7692454291748cd3687c8e54a.JPG

 

 

 

540.JPG.814f2ced41919e68ceafac8478bc5b18.JPG

 

 

 

541.JPG.6c1f92bc2da798ce3a3bbe64f4afbb34.JPG

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today, I did nothing but spend a whole day in the studio wondering about the true shape and size of a component! I have been faithful to the original design, but the following picture of the drive rod support in the complete set of books and drawings do not see the detailed description. I've been going over the EdT process again and again, and I still can't find the exact answer except for the following photo, which seems to me to be different from the drawing, as if it's a column instead of an“L” in the process picture. So I can't take the next step. Maybe this part isn't important? But I still hope that who knows friends can provide specific shape for my reference. Also to maximize the restoration of the model's true shape. Thanks for your help!

 

1896415194_QQ20220609001833.png.86c9d15f0b6006a10f05dc2830e8030e.png

 

DSC04225.JPG.f857d2b7532427bd452c4ce11819b2c4.JPG

 

DSC04228.JPG.3db00ee991c0b7713a4838c5c3290541.JPG

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have the right shape of those supports and just need the pump "arms" bent to shape.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These support posts varied on different contemporary models. I've seen iron ones with an upright post supported by a curved bracket down from the top to the hatch coaming inboard.

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, druxey said:

These support posts varied on different contemporary models. I've seen iron ones with an upright post supported by a curved bracket down from the top to the hatch coaming inboard.

Thanks Druxey for the information. After careful consideration, I will use the simplest approach without reliable information or detailed references. Avoid self-defeating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2022 at 9:35 AM, Bitao said:

I have been faithful to the original design, but the following picture of the drive rod support in the complete set of books and drawings do not see the detailed description. I've been going over the EdT process again and again, and I still can't find the exact answer except for the following photo, which seems to me to be different from the drawing, as if it's a column instead of an“L” in the process picture.

I interpret the cross-section drawing as cutting along the axis of the drive rod.  This is why one sees a solid column where the L-shaped stanchion is, at the end of the drive rod.

 

Figure 33-33 of the book matches your interpretation, exactly.  The paragraph that details Figure 33-33 talks about how one could construct the L-shaped stanchion in the same manner that copper wire was used to create the iron knees, or cut them from copper plate.  To me, this confirms that the stanchions that cap the end of the drive rod are L-shaped.

 

As L-shaped stanchions go, yours are quite lovely.  Looking at your photo, I noticed that they are a shiny copper and I assume that you intend to blacken them as I think that they would have been made of iron; blackening them makes them consistent with Edward Tosti's model.  Also, I see that there are no crank handles offset from the drive shaft.  I guess the plan is to add them once you feel comfortable with the L-shaped stanchions?

Edited by Alan Cabrera
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alan Cabrera said:

I interpret the cross-section drawing as cutting along the axis of the drive rod.  This is why one sees a solid column where the L-shaped stanchion is, at the end of the drive rod.

 

Many thanks to Alan Cabrera for his detailed answers and for providing me with the location of the book. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear in the previous post: The image of the“L” formation was borrowed from Edward Tosti's process rather than my own. Because my knowledge of English is limited, mainly with the help of the Internet translator and we have limited communication, for drawings and books, I usually more directly use data and pictures to distinguish, so a lot of things aren't really understood; for me, reading and understanding is my biggest obstacle, and it takes me a lot more time and it's a lot harder than building parts, and it's a major factor in my progress. The following results were completed in two days according to my personal understanding. In fact, they were also made by the integral milling method after I scrapped two plans and six parts, to first ensure that the installation after the connection is stable and reliable (I rarely use glue to join metal parts of the method) . The finished product will be different from Edward Tosti's, but for me, with limited reading comprehension, it's safer to use the plan in the drawing, so I didn't use an“L” but instead a vertical pillar that looks like a pyramid. I'm sorry to disappoint you.

 

543.JPG.a17ebc88a3a7b17c9b242bcbc2b24372.JPG

 

 

542.JPG.ad9db318dceabf3fc933bf6eb96f0a18.JPG

 

 

544.JPG.74dc30211b28fef88d86f7ea3433cb6b.JPG

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2022 at 4:44 PM, French Mr Bean said:

When I look at the photos, a question comes to me: "Where is the dust?" 🤣

For me, showing others is not only a clear picture, but also an attitude of doing things. Clean Environment is not only comfortable to operate, but also to avoid the processing error caused by dust, especially small parts.:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bitao said:

I'm sorry to disappoint you.

Oh, not disappointed at all!  I love to see different Craftsmans’ interpretations and decisions. Those stanchions are also quite lovely.

 

If I did have to mention a disappointment, I would say that I would very much LOVE to see a video of you crafting them; I realize the difficulties inherent in creating such a recording and don’t want make you feel awkward.  It’s just that you are sooooo good at crafting those lovely tiny bits…

Edited by Alan Cabrera
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due to my very limited knowledge, and may not have a good understanding of ED drawings and design concepts and instructions, resulting in the previous completed with the chain pump connected to the“Axis tree” manufacturing error. I may have“Simplified” it for a lot of people. Thanks to Greg for correcting this in time and providing me with detailed drawings that gave me an intuitive understanding of their basic structure. His rigorous attitude and the spirit of unremitting pursuit again let me admire unceasingly! This made me decide that I had to scrap the original result and re-make this part, even though it was considered perfect by many and liked it. Maybe the improvements you see now are still not perfect, but I have done my best. In my opinion, every outstanding person is trying to achieve every detail, it is this forum for everyone the biggest harvest. It's also a reality I have to face in order to make progress. Here, I have to thank each and every one of them for providing me with the information and correcting my mistakes. Thank you!

 

547.JPG.1c226f1a61041f6b2ed097bf23e5087b.JPG

 

 

 

548.JPG.b059fbc09a1841575ed04484c4cd1b80.JPG

 

 

 

549.JPG.8aeeabf3da091f6791a6f93ea802a022.JPG

 

 

 

550.JPG.e0afd87f8adaee8eaf04b41a611b16e3.JPG

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks perfect now, like the rest of your work. I should point out the the illustration was created by David Antscherl as part of The Fully Framed Swan series of books.

Edited by dvm27

Greg

website
Admiralty Models

moderator Echo Cross-section build
Admiralty Models Cross-section Build

Finished build
Pegasus, 1776, cross-section

Current build
Speedwell, 1752

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your joinery remains first class Bitao, those scarfed joints are super clean and crisp.

 

cheers

 

Pat

If at first you do not suceed, try, and then try again!
Current build: HMCSS Victoria (Scratch)

Next build: HMAS Vampire (3D printed resin, scratch 1:350)

Built:          Battle Station (Scratch) and HM Bark Endeavour 1768 (kit 1:64)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Great to see your update Bitao, I was missing them.

 

cheers

 

Pat

If at first you do not suceed, try, and then try again!
Current build: HMCSS Victoria (Scratch)

Next build: HMAS Vampire (3D printed resin, scratch 1:350)

Built:          Battle Station (Scratch) and HM Bark Endeavour 1768 (kit 1:64)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...