Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! (Only 44 donations so far out of 49,000 members - C'mon guys!) ×

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. probably while this doesn’t look like normal rigged deadeyes, there seems to be some strap over them. Besides: all other stays visible in the pics are rigged with some sort of turnbuckle-like construction. Jan
  2. They do not show a considerable amount of detail, but in the Dutch Rijksmuseum collection, there are a couple of pics of Loreley. I took screenshots, and copied the link https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/NL/collectie/RP-F-F01148-M https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/RP-F-F01148-I https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/zoeken/objecten?q=S.m.s.+Loreley&p=1&ps=12&st=Objects&ii=0#/RP-F-F01148-Y,0 This one is frustrating: it shows the channels, but not the deadeyes. https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/zoeken/objecten?q=S.m.s.+Loreley&p=1&ps=12&st=Objects&ii=4#/RP-F-F01148-J,4 Holidaypics from a distant period....
  3. And in your second picture they look more like "normal deadeyes". I have once seen (and I blame myself for not remembering where) a nice illustration of the systems that have been invented in the rather short period between the mid-1850's when wooden deadeyes were standard, and the early 1900's, when steel turnbuckles were the standard. I thought it was on segelschiffsmodellbau, but the man I thought that posted denied doing so.... Still thinking and searching ….. Jan
  4. Going to be a nice spectacle for your followers. I’m pulling up a chair
  5. That is really a close call. Both look great. As you say: choice depends on the actual part you are looking at. I prefer the Eduards-version because of the breachlock does look a bot more detailed. But taking the handwheels as your main part, the other one is (marginally) better, at least in the pics. I guess that placed on the model both will be looking fantastic..... Jan
  6. Sounds like you have a nice organ. I try to find my way on a small, not so nice, early 20th century one. Bach doens't quite fit to something like that, and Mendelsohn is above my league I like the 'Psalmbewerkingen in Noord-Duitse stijl' van Sietze de Vries (also not fit for my instrument, but at least I can play them ) I'll folow your upcoming build. Not quite a plastic/small scale myself (actually, almost no modelbuilding left in my sparese time) but I am surprised at the precision of those smale-scale models. Jan
  7. And another welcome. There are some 1/350 builders active here in the forum. Enough to share experiences (btw Bach or something more modern?) Jan
  8. Hi, Danny's work (both in wood and in paper) is fantastic, and inspired quite a lot of us. However, Danny will not read your praise, he died earlier this year. Jan
  9. Hi Doris, Your rigging looks absolutely wonderful. (do you make the rope yourself, or do you have a source for that?) The only thing I do not quite understand is the rigging of your top-rope: you used a sheeve rather high in foot of the topmast, I would have expected a sheeve somewhere further down the heel of the topmast (like in Andersons book pages 176/177). Rigging it through a lower sheeve would enable lifting the mast above the level of the cross trees. [edit, 10 sept]. And looking again, I realized that the set-up is exactly as in Anderson, but not with a single, but a double top-rope. I should have seen the other rope going down. Did take me some time to understand that what I expected to see, is on the other side of the masttop. (And thus not visible in your pics as all pics show the same side of the model) I should have seen it at once yesterday. As one of my teachers said: please think before you are going to ask silly questions.... Jan
  10. Hi Doris, Thanks for the update! Stunning quality as ever.... Jan Dirk
  11. Interesting to see that they rigged the lanyards 'upside down' in Kampen: the stopperknot is in the lower deadeye, not the upper one. Jan
  12. I'm always surprised at the increas in size between Dreadnought and WWII ships. Jan
  13. You could (when you have loads of time) go through the danish navy archive, whether or not there are any usefull drawings. (Nosearch available, no sorting in the archive, so random clicking needed....) I found some that may be helpfull: https://www.sa.dk/ao-soegesider/billedviser?epid=17149179#208161,39521644 same here: https://www.sa.dk/ao-soegesider/billedviser?epid=17149179#208163,39521646 the decks have been marked in red, in this ship, the poop-rail is even lower (ie non-existent), and no deck-openings. the other one on the rig: https://www.sa.dk/ao-soegesider/billedviser?epid=17149179#208164,39521647 gaf-rigged, but having a full length lateen yard. Jan I
  14. AllBentleys in the internet have gloss bonnets, and not so glossy bodywork. looks as if you hit the nail on the head. Jan
  15. Actually, I see a stylized daisy..... My first idea was 'button'. Can it be the remnants of a metal button, dating some time (but not too long time) back? Jan
  16. As I understood, it is a fictitious name, for a ship based on real contenporeneous drawings. I tried to locate the drawings in the NMM-archive, but there are so many that I did not succeed (so far) Jan
  17. With regard to thebon et in the main sail, I would say the artist did his job: you can see the bonnetn both sides, part of it being hidden by the dragon/wolf. (Would not guess that being a dog) And going by the way the artist draws the fishy things in the water, perhaps the detailing in the ship might not be acurate to the smallest detail Jan
  18. Very nice barrels. Pewter figurines used to be rather popular till someone found out than neither the production nor the playing with it was not without some health hazards Perhaps your hippie-dude uses resin nowadays. Have seen some very nice results with that. also in this forum: Jan
  19. Sometimes Ithink those soldiers were very, very tired of war, and rather proud of their superior machines. In that case 'telling the enemy' doesn't count anymore, telling others on how the machine operates still does. Jan
  20. That is not true, although you don't see the individual parts, you do see the difference between a model with and without PE. Espcially when done with care, like yours. and if only seen on pics, we can only encourage you to place more pics Most of the small scales here are warships. Itis niceto see something slightly more peacefull jan
  21. Here you can see the shoulder-rests of the gun. (I think different type of gun/sub, but the principle is the same: the rests help to steady and point the rather heavy gun) Tpic downloaded here: http://www.ww2technik.de/dsub_geschuetze.htm Jan
  22. Hello Yves, I hardly dare to ask the question, but isn't the shoulderrest of the smaller gun upside down? I thought those brackets should rest on the shoulder of the gunman. Jan
×
×
  • Create New...