Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! (Only 75 donations so far out of 49,000 members - C'mon guys!) ×

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. Did you see Joseph Lavender's models? That is some amazing micro-scale. Gregs models are huge compared to his. No Varyag, however. Jan
  2. What a ship! I like those early battleships, especially after the special treatment you give them. (one question: did you use light grey/white thread for the rigging, or is it shiny as a result of the flashlight?). On the pics it looks so clean compared to al the dirt and rust..... Jan
  3. The 'real' Batavia has its wales natural. Black can be quite heavy lookin. I prefer natural. Jan
  4. The ships boats were something of a battle. There is no real instruction, so it is totally unclear whether the topside should go inside the hull, or on top of it. Either way: it wouldn't fit nicely. The topside of the large boat was around 2 mm short, and put together, it does not sit properly on its stands.... Here is the result of a couple of hours. Bit frustrating small remark: part of the boats were also in the lasercut-set. However, there the same (and some other) issues arose. the lasercut (although sold to me together with the model itself) does not fit to the DeRuyter in grey. It is specifically designed on the other version: the one in 'dazzle'-paint. In the macro-pics you can see one of the issues with the scaldis-models: when handled, the toplayer comes loose, resulting edges to loose their crispness. you can see it on the edges of the boats: they become a bit 'fuzzy' Jan
  5. Hi Kees, Good to see you again, I missed your updates! The ship is coming together nicely. How did you do those navigation lights? They look as if you just made them from real sheet metal. Jan
  6. Now I am at a loss: what colour did the car have when leaving the factory: was it white, or black?? Jan
  7. Ithough ships and maple syrup were your lines of business, but yourrailroad is also ofhigh quality! Jan
  8. This kit was (loosely) based on a model in the Rotterdam Maritime museum, https://www.maritiemdigitaal.nl/index.cfm?event=search.getdetail&id=100009961 (it is a shame that there are no high-resolution pics in this database) and I guess some basic drawings dating back from the sixties. Lots of knowledge on fluits has build up since then, mainly due to the archeology, and better access to the archives. So, when the kit diverges from the archeology, I would tend to follow archeology. The winch is rubbish: the sides should be smaller, and if there are thoseextensions, they should be forwardfacing: thta is the direction in which they should withstand some force. In some of the smaller wrecks, the whinch is going from side to side. I have also seen drawings (don't know where) with the heavy sides that enclose the winch. As far as I know, the winch should be from one piece: no way to attach two parts in such a way that the thing does not break when force is applied. In more modern fishingboats, (botters) as far as I know there are three types: round, octagonal, or round with some strips attached. The last two, to create aditional friction onto the cable. there should be square holes in it, to get the lever in. Jan
  9. West-frisian is a bit confusing terminology: in the Netherlands it refers to the northern part of North-holland, in Germany it ofter refers to anything west of their region Ost-friesland (wich is essentially the dutch provinces Groningen and Friesland). It is not correct to say that the Dutch ended the political independence of west-friesland when you refer to the dutch region west-friesland. The word 'dutch' did not come into existence after the napoleontic era. Before that the netherlands consisted of a political union of various regions, holland being the most important. The political freedom of the kingdom of frisia ended in 1300. The region around Hoorn.Schermer (the waling area) was part of Holland ever since the early middleages (the period were the zuijderzee became increasingly large). So if Frisian was ever the main language around Hoorn, it would have been around 1300, not around 1700. Around 1700 Dutch (which is essentially the dominant dialect spoken in holland) was standard in the western parts of the republic of the netherlands. The Frisian admirality operated from Harlingen (east side of the zuiderzee), and was a small admirality. The Frisian traders operated from Harlingen and Stavoren, and were mainly in the Baltic trade (wood and wheat) Whalers came from Holland, and not from Frisia. Whaling industry was located in Holland, not in Frisia. Jan
  10. Could you please post a picture. I have some problem in getting the picture, and am afraid to advise you in the wrong way. Jan
  11. In that case I understand why it is on indefinite hold. I didn't realize David sells preprinted kits, I only knew the free pdf-downloads. Jan
  12. Actually, I didn't check that. Stern is the german translation I learned for the dutch wordt ster..... I never heard noorden ster. Noordster and poolster are quite common. I am not familiar with Frisian ( which is not a dialect, but a different language). Dutch whalers came from the region north-holland (schermer/de rijp). Poolsterre would be the name to use. @robert Lamba: where do you come from that you are familiar various dutch dialects, as well as flemish? Jan
  13. On the bright side: as you have a pdf, you can repeat this one until you're happy That is - I think - one of the lessons you tried to teach us in your own card-tutorial. Jan
  14. Nice little ship. I downloaded some of the free ships, but still hesitating, as there are so many alomost invisible parts... Although there is a nice Dutch monitor. Perhaps I will do that one. Jan
  15. I checked: in books on navigation around 1775/1800 they wrote about the poolsterre. Both stern and sterne are german words. Couldn't find those in Dutchtexts. Jan
  16. Hi Dan, the model of the Rex has been build by a rather famous shipbuilder. He knew what he was doing. As Dafi wrote: the slot in the upper deck has a cover (removable). The width of the slot is such that it remains just within the so-called schaarstokken: the heavy planks that are part of the main structure of the deck. The length of the whipstaff coming through the upper deck is around 3 ft, too little to be handled from the top dedk, but exactly the length you need to pustthe whipstaff down to gain maximum rudder-angle. and as both your and my drawings show: there is no need for a long slot: due to the fact that you push down the staff, the top of the staff goesunder the deck quite soon. Comparable, rather short slots can be seen on th epics of the HohenzollernModell and a model of a Dutch ship in Gent. They all suggest that the helmsman was not onthe uppereck, but one deck down. It was not unttil the inteoduction of the steering wheel that the helmsman got to the upper deck again. Jan
  17. We had that discussion some time ago in a German forum. The opening in the upper deck is only to accomodate the overlenght of the whipstaff. The helmsmsn is down under, near the rowle. Ad you drew it: to get a reasonable rudder-angle , the opening in the upper deck should be enormous and thewhipstaff even longer. Doesn’t fit at all. I sketched this one for the discussion in that other forum. the end of the whipstaff goed under the upper deck even before half of the maximum rudderangle is reached. check the internet: the william Rex is a contemporeneous model: it shows a short opening on the upper deck. Jan
  18. Wouldn't call this 'little build': in cardterms this thing is really huge Jan
  19. I've been searching, and I have seen two (incomplete) buildlogs of this model on italian fora. Both logs showed the contents of the box: lots of parts, and a booklet with pictures, no drawings. I also found that the drawings by Lusci do not really match the model by disar.... Looks as if you are more or less at the deep end . Jan
  20. On second thought: what do you meanby 'the kit has no plans' do you mean that there are no drawings included? In that case I would ask for them by the seller, as building a model without drawings is near impossible.....
  21. Vincezo Lusci was an Italian writing some books on modelbuilding, somewhere around the late sixties. He made a couple of ship plans, that showed kind of 'archetypical ships', with a good sounding name on it. In germany you had Rolf Hoeckel, doing the same. I am pretty sure that this model is based on a number of paintings showi g spanish galleons, and not a historically accurate model of a specific ship. these 60-iesmodels make attractive models, but not historically accurate models. Even if it was a model depicting the state of the art knowledge on historic shipbuilding, the research has moved on since the 60-ies, so presumably not accurate and state of the art nowadays. having said that: it still makes and attractive looking model. and I don't see why there is a strange configuration near the keel: what I see is that the planks run a bit high along the stern, but that is due to the fact that all older kits, and quite a few modern ones, use rather stiff straight planks for the hull, while they should be spiled, and slightly inward curving. But perhaps you see something I don't.... Jan
  22. Welcome to MSW. There is always someone here to help you out hoewever: we always ask for a small illustration of what you are working on. That helps us to give advice. So, may I ask for a picture? No need to send high quality pica in optimal lighti g. Just a cellphone camera will do. Jan
  23. Just curious: you had some woodsplitting problems laat year. How did you manage to stop that? Jan
  24. And nowit is done. the beak is a bit too dark. The instructions said black, and I already toned it down a bit with wome white. I think it should be grey, with some brown added. At least, now it is too stark. the two parts for connecting wings and body. They proved to be a bittrickyto get i the rightlocation. I have some remaining gaps in the front edge of the wing. And all done. I tried to take some pics in a more fitting background (garden), but the wind turned out too strong, so the bird flew away too quick toget some decent pics. But youget the general idea of thefinished product. As usual, small amount of parts, not much time needed (couple of hours, and you're done), but great run, and rather convincing result. Thinking what bird will be next.... Jan
×
×
  • Create New...