Jump to content

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. Hi Piet, I guess this is the end of your tweaking? Or do you still see room for improvement. Judging by the pics I think you have nailed it: Ship, water, smoke, action. Great model. Jan
  2. And spme of us happen to know some Dutch, so don't hesitate asking for a translation in the case google translate gives you nonsense
  3. I can live with that As it llpks now, she will be up to your usual standard Where do you buy the syringe and needles? Jan
  4. Hi Piet, the sea is quite good. The larger bow wave does add to the diorama. Ans as the others said: smoke is getring better and better. I wagerly await the end of your further experiments! jan
  5. Standard practice with deagostini: no kits, only subscriptions, and not all subscriptions available in all countries. (Or at least, not at the same time) I don't know how it is now, but last year Wasa did not ship to theNetherlands. sometimes, ebay is your escape: someone starting the subscription,but dis not start it, and now resells. But as this one is available only in Russia, I don't think your chances are very high...... Jan
  6. So do I. I don't always respond to new posts, but I always drop in to see the pics. She is avery convincing model. Guess you van posts video's of the model in the water, and claim it is the full-size orgininal. No one will notice Jan
  7. I took some time to read this one. This guy is a wizard with cotton and chicken wire. (Although my guess is that a major part of the wizardry is not in the cotton, but in his setup for the pics) Jan
  8. Did some searchin gin the navy foto-archive. Found three pics (Piet without doubt has them on his computer). two of Java firing (one at daytime at full speed, one at night, and looking at the water: without speed at all) and one of De Ruyter showing the burning hot gasses leaving the gun. IN the night-pic I can't discover whether or not we only see the center of the smoke-ball, or the total. IN that case, it is a fairly compact smoke-ball. Comparing it to the other two, I guess we see only the core of the smoke, that is lighter by the hot gasses. Jan
  9. Hi Piet, That is a very nice result. And as you ask: I think the smoke from the stacks is convincing, the smoke from the guns is not. I have three points of doubt: 1. the form: I was in the artillery during my military service (10 guys to man one gun, so I am not too surprised by the number of man standing to one gun). And one thing we learned: The smokeball from the gun has a strange form: once the shell leaves the gun, the first amount of smoke is blown sideways, at the same time the gumn recoils, and the remainder of the smoke trails the shell. It makes the smokeball a bit lengthened, but slightly wider at the point where it leaves the gun, but also: the end of the gun is covered in smoke just after firing. And also: the smoke ball is denser and darker in the middle, and more open at the outside, especially when there is some wind blowing.It is certainly not a round ball-like cloud (and of course: the size of the smokeball depending on quite a lot of factors). 2. the place were it is relative to the guns: as the ship is going full speed, the smoke ball is not in the middle of the gun, but it trails the ship a bit. 3. : when you depict the gun while firing, the last smoke leaving contains burning powder, and is therefore colored different from the remainder of the smokeball. In short: I like the result so far, but I think the gun-smoke needs some tuning..... (below the only pic of a firing gun I have in my archive: A Dutch M114/39 shortly after firing a shell)
  10. Have a safe trip. and gefeliciteerd met de verjaardag van je moeder! Jan
  11. But as you guys all climb the roof, I will take the empty spot just next to his work bench. I need to be close, as my eyesight is not good enough to folow the work from some distance. Hope you don't mind. I'll honestly try not to spill my popcorn crumbs over his freshly painted parts. Jan
  12. Every time I see your model, it becomes more and more clear that Katherine is a very elegant ship in her lines and appearance. I like her very much. Jan
  13. Those amazonprices are ridiculous. European bookstores ask more reasonable prices. Perhaps this book is still available in the bookstore Jan
  14. This book shows modern designs, all made by the same designer. These designs are all yaghts based on the old dutch working boats. They are as such not drawings of old shiptypes and working boats. Depends on your goals whether or not this is a usefull book for you. Jan
  15. It is this one: https://www.ssrp.nl/publicaties/boeken/platbodemjachten-van-jk-gipon
  16. Hi, That will a difficult one. In the seventies, quite a lot of books on these ships were published, all looking more or less the same. (at least: in type of content: a description of the ships, illustrated with some line-plans and general plans, and a lot of fotographic material.) Unless you have a hint of the front cover, or the list of contents, you'll need someone that actually owns the book to get a confirmation.... I don't know the quality of your Dutch, but this site offers a lot of info on these classic dutch ships: https://www.ssrp.nl/stamboek/scheepstypes Jan
  17. This answer doesn't diminishing my amount of strungling. Only the contents of it the level of detail in these paperkits is astonishing. Jan
  18. Luckily the flu didn't damage your building quality I am a bit struggling to see where the cardboard ends and the PE sets in with the guns. Do you have a pic halfway the construction? Jan
  19. Hi Carl, The material sold is coconut-fiber, and I understood that Marcus didn't like that material. Although I don't understand why, because these near straight fibers are scale-wise much better than these plastic bristles.... The same material is also sold as nesting material for cage-birds. I guess it is cheaper when sold as nesting material compared to scale building material @Marcus: using anything thicker than the coconut-fiber is hugely over scale, and will (my humble opinion) not do justice to your mill. Real thatching is just dried reed, about one-and a half meter long, and not more than 4/5 mm thick. anything thicker than 0.5 mm will be overscale. The fun is that in a well thatched roof, the individual reeds can't be seen, unless you are a a viewing distance of anything within a couple of meters. I therefore understand the suggestion of using a kind of paste-like material applied with a coarse brush, and paint it afterwards in the correct colour. Jan
  20. Hi Betaqdave, One thing I know for sure, these strips are not part of a kit, for the simple reason that Doris does not use any kits, it is all scratch build from drawing and paintings Jan
  21. What are you building: scratch, or kit? In a kit, most parts are on the general plan, but also in much more detail in de separate plan. The need to have your drawings full size against the wall is less urgent in that case. In answer: I did my Prins Willem mostly on partly folded drawings. Only when I really needed the full scale general view drawings, I laid them out on the floor, did my measurements, and folded them again. (and yes, after ten years of folding and unfolding, the drawing has become a bit shabby) Jan
  22. Wow, that looks wonderfull. Dont iverdo the waves and details, it is wuite atunning how irr is. did you already try a pic at a low cameraposition? jan
×
×
  • Create New...