Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    12,417
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. I'm so sorry that you were scammed, Aleksandr. I've tried milling such moldings and still prefer the control of using a scraper that has been shaped from a scrap piece of hacksaw blade. Using a mill sometimes 'eats' the work as one feeds it through! Perhaps this was a lucky accident for you after all.
  2. Glad to read that all is going well, Keith. A friend's Admiral recently had cataracts removed. She was quite indignant at the sight of her wrinkles in the mirror. She is 86.
  3. You are forgiven, Glen! Although that brush looks a little sad....
  4. I hate to see good brushes abused that way but, when needs must.... If using oil based paint, another technique is to use sanding sealer on the area, then paint. Any spot of unwanted paint can easily be scraped off when thoroughly set.
  5. Absolutely nothing wrong with lo-tech; it's how the old-time ship model-makers did it! Very nice and clean work, Erik.
  6. Joking aside, please note that early ships did not have continuous decks. They were stepped so as to avoid cutting ports into the wales, as seen in post #10, 'Santa Maria".
  7. To 'read' ships' plans is a study in itself. Without a working knowledge it is easy to get things confused, such as internal/external planking expansion plans. Perhaps it is easier to grasp the difference in longitudinal sheer and deck curves by studying photographs of contemporary models. The sheer of the wales and outer plank is easily seen. The line of ports will follow the sheer of the decks. Usually these cross each other, particularly aft. https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-66344 Orford, 1698 That said, there are exceptions! My current model's deck and wale sheer happen to be identical! (This is a Dutch-built, French designed ship of 1778/9.)
  8. Scantlings will be a good guide for any ship of the same size and period. Allan's book is an invaluable source for measurements.
  9. There are two single frames. the 'dead flat' and 'dead flat 1'. Both are, in fact, dead flat, but the labelling distinguishes them, as well as the fact that the joints are staggered one from another. So, the 'dead flat' starts with a pair of first futtocks and the 'dead flat 1' with a floor, as shown in the framing elevation. There should be a pattern for 'dead flat' as well as 'dead flat 1' which you've posted above.
  10. Congratulations on a fine model - and case. The repainted counter looks great. I like your solution to the many rigols at that scale. Well done!
  11. I can't tell which line you are referring to, Allan. Can you add an arrow or something, please?
  12. I think that the fish hook would be around the lower end of the shank of the anchor rather than at the fluke as you have it, Phil. Otherwise, that looks very nicely done.
  13. Ouch! I had not read the description of that particular chuck in detail. I would shy away from plastic as well!
  14. Here is one source: https://www.chippingaway.com/shop/miniature-tools-wood-working/proxxon-bench-top-power-tools/proxxon-micro-woodturning-lathe/4-jaw-chuck/ There are others if you search the Internet.
×
×
  • Create New...