Jump to content

HMS Bellona 1760 by SJSoane - Scale 1:64 - English 74-gun - as designed


Recommended Posts

Actually I nipped out into the cold and took a photo of the page, hope this helps, see no520190221_195131.thumb.jpg.e368edbfa6e849de60b19bd696873ee9.jpg

Regards

Paul

20190221_195126.thumb.jpg.f4fb84a88a238de2764df35410b3bfa5.jpg

The clerk of the cheque's yacht of sheerness

Current build HMS Sirius (1797) 1:48 scratch POF from NMM plans

HMS Winchelsea by chuck 1:48

Cutter cheerful by chuck 1:48

Previous builds-

Elidir - Thames steam barge

Cutty Sark-Billings boats

Wasa - billings boats

Among others 😁

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howdy!

  Although obviously not a primary source, here is a drawing from the AOTS Royal Caroline - 1749 by Sergio Bellabarba & Giorgio Osculati with drawings attributed to Osculati.

GunTackle.pdf

GunTackle.jpg.112bd661ce0372fa85d6c2f323c15200.jpg

  The area around the cascabel is a bit ambiguous but seems to maybe some kind of woven eye that is seized?

  

Edited by Katoom
Add jpeg image
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, everyone, for continuing ideas about what I had assumed until now was a very straightforward detail.

 

Gaetan, I like your idea of giving the ship to French, and renaming it Le Bellona, because Boudriot's drawings are a delight to view. But I think the British on this website would object to me giving over a British ship to the French without a battle....😊  Beautiful photos of your old project, by the way.

 

druxey, I have been thinking again that a cut splice would also be consistent with the drawings we see in my favorite source, Falconer. Falconer does list this splice (he spells it the pre-Bowlderized form below). He does not explicitly refer to the breech rope for this splice; although this is not in itself a reason to reject the idea.

2107017645_ScreenShot2019-02-21at5_02_56PM.thumb.png.b40ab60dcd6ecc54c36aeca798db9378.png

And Kevin, your very interesting drawing could be a cut splice as well, but with some seizing at the joins.

 

Paul, thanks for going out into the cold to get a picture! It looks to me like this cannon is of the later date, when a cast iron ring was formed into the cannon itself. As we have all struggled here with how this worked earlier, it is very easy to see now what an important invention this was, to cast the ring right into the cannon. Elegant solution to a difficult detail.

 

Chuck, your detail is consistent with earlier comments druxey made, referencing a "turn around" the cascable. This one makes the most sense, along with the cut splice, as a clean and functional answer to this detail. I just wish the Falconer drawings showed something closer to this, and I would be happier with taking it up. It is an outside possibility that Falconer simplified his drawings at such a small scale, I will admit.

 

At this point, the ideas most appealing to me are the simple drape over the button with a seizing, as Siggi recently showed (most consistent with the two contemporary sources, the Royal George section and the Falconer drawings), or a cut splice, which is more functional, and could be inferred in the Falconer drawing but not the Royal George section. I may decide this once I start trying to rig the cannon, and see what suggests itself as more appropriate.

 

Best wishes,

 

Mark

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by SJSoane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go along with the others on this except for one point.   I doubt the breeching rope would have went through an eyebolt when using the gun.  That's a weak point subject to breakage.  If you pull back the gun, the angles involved would tend to lift the forward end.  Maybe not much though.  Then again, the eyebolt might also help keep the breeching on the button when firing.  

 

Falconer does have an interesting set of drawings.  It looks like breeching rope was used also as the tackle to put the gun back into battery.  Somehow, I just think that's really doable due to the diameter of the rope. Top part of your Flaconer scan with the gun pulled back.  The line reeves through the eyebolt and pulleys as well as running over the button.  There's something about this that just doesn't seem like a good thing.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at it with an admittedly inexperienced eye, I assumed when looking at that Falconer drawing that he was showing an alternative arrangement for the gun tackles, and the breeching rope was hidden for clarity. It seems pretty straightforward, there is no way that light line is going to stop that big gun on recoil, so we have to be seeing an incomplete rig. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked closer at the Falconer drawing (the upper one).... there is no breeching rope or it's "hidden" as Vossiewulf says.  What we see going over the button is the outhaul tackle line that's laying across the button and then falls off to the rear on the deck.   <smacks forehead>   

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that we were referring to figure 19 in Falconer, not 18, Mark! In any case, it appears that the breech rope has been shortened in figure 19 in order to secure the gun against the bulwark - it's not in 'action' position and cannot be run in. Presumably one end of the breeching at the bulwark is loosened from the ringbolt, pulled taut and re-secured.

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Yes, the upper drawing in Falconer (18) clearly shows the rig without a breech rope. Why the tackle is shown tied to the button I have no idea.

 

As we all look at (19) more carefully, it is admittedly a little confusing. That rope shown in the breech position is clearly too thin. And yet, it reeves through the ring and eyebolt on the side of the carriage, which is where the breech rope goes. And Falconer's text referring to this drawing says that it shows the breeching rope "where it is employed to lash the cannon when it is housed during the course of a voyage." I have no idea why he shows such a thin line for what he is calling the breech rope. I can't imagine replacing the thick breech rope for a thinner line when the cannon is stored.

 

When we look at the gundeck plan, his text referring to this says "the use of the breeching, as it checks the recoil of the cannon, is shewn in plate III. DECK."  So this shows the gun run inboard for loading, not for storage.

 

druxey, I think you are right that the breech rope must have been tightened up at one end when the cannon was stored. Falconer's deck drawing shows the rope as too long in its action length to tighten up for its storage length. I also find it interesting that the position when pulled fully inboard does not leave a lot of room for swabbing out the cannon and inserting a new ball. The ramming rod must have been projected out the gunport when in use. I wonder how many fell overboard in the heat of the moment?

 

So one lesson from this closer inspection is that the drawings themselves might have some inconsistencies in them (like the thickness of the breech rope); and so might we fear that the arrangement of the breech rope at the button is also simplified?

 

And likewise with the photo of section of the Royal George; might we fear that the breech ropes were replaced much later in a renovation of the model, by someone who did not know any better? How far can we trust our primary sources?

 

Need that time machine again. Druxey, I hope your steampunk design is well underway!

 

Mark

Screen Shot 2019-02-20 at 11.55.25 AM.png

i_211_thumb.jpg

Screen Shot 2019-02-20 at 11.57.23 AM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putting aside the breeching rope for some thinking time, I have moved on to casting the cannon. I am setting the masters in the clay moulds, ready for the rubber mould pour.

 

Can someone remind me what to use for a release agent between the clay and the rubber mould material? I can't find this anywhere in my notes or sources. Do I just use the release material for rubber to rubber?

 

Mark

 

IMG_8400.jpg

Edited by SJSoane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was talcom powder mentioned?

Alan O'Neill
"only dead fish go with the flow"   :dancetl6:

Ongoing Build (31 Dec 2013) - HMS BELLEROPHON (1786), POF scratch build, scale 1:64, 74 gun 3rd rate Man of War, Arrogant Class

Member of the Model Shipwrights of Niagara, Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada (2016), and the Nautical Research Guild (since 2014)

Associate member of the Nautical Research and Model Ship Society (2021)

Offshore member of The Society of Model Shipwrights (2021)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

The sprues are now installed in the moulds, as well as the locating dimples. I took extra care this time to clean up the clay at the edge of the master. Last time, I left the clay either a tiny bit high or low, and this creates a thin edge on one side of the mould or the other, which deteriorated over time. So I spent a lot of time with a sharpened toothpick to get these as clean as I can.

 

Probably pouring rubber tomorrow. I did read on the instructions on the rubber mould material that I should use the rubber to rubber release even on the box sides and the clay. When in doubt, read the instructions...😀

 

Mark

IMG_8402.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed that all goes well, Mark.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicely done Mark, I'm sure that you wont have any trouble with these.

 

Michael

Current builds  Bristol Pilot Cutter 1:8;      Skipjack 19 foot Launch 1:8;       Herreshoff Buzzards Bay 14 1:8

Other projects  Pilot Cutter 1:500 ;   Maria, 1:2  Now just a memory    

Future model Gill Smith Catboat Pauline 1:8

Finished projects  A Bassett Lowke steamship Albertic 1:100  

 

Anything you can imagine is possible, when you put your mind to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Marc, Mark and Michael, for the good thoughts. My challenges with technology in photo etching have spooked me a little when I get outside the realm of wood.

 

So here is the first pour of rubber. Won't know if I got a good pour without bubbles for another 4 hours or more.

Also, let me know if that is a good buy for potato chips in the background...😀

 

Mark

IMG_8405.jpg

Edited by SJSoane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, SJSoane said:

Also, let me know if that is a good buy for potato chips in the background...😀

I am more interested in the Coffee ad to the immediate top left. LOL

Current builds  Bristol Pilot Cutter 1:8;      Skipjack 19 foot Launch 1:8;       Herreshoff Buzzards Bay 14 1:8

Other projects  Pilot Cutter 1:500 ;   Maria, 1:2  Now just a memory    

Future model Gill Smith Catboat Pauline 1:8

Finished projects  A Bassett Lowke steamship Albertic 1:100  

 

Anything you can imagine is possible, when you put your mind to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mark - 

 

From what I can see you should get a good set of molds for your castings.  One trick that I picked up from some forgotten article is to vibrate the mold as the rubber is setting, which will help any small bubbles rise to the surface and disappear.  If you do not have access to a vibrating table (the article was in a scientific journal which assumed that your laboratory had one)  then tape a powered toothbrush to the side of the mold and let it run while the rubber is setting.

 

Best of success to you.  I look forward to seeing how things work out.

 

Dan

Current build -SS Mayaguez (c.1975) scale 1/16" = 1' (1:192) by Dan Pariser

 

Prior scratch builds - Royal yacht Henrietta, USS Monitor, USS Maine, HMS Pelican, SS America, SS Rex, SS Uruguay, Viking knarr, Gokstad ship, Thames River Skiff , USS OneidaSwan 42 racing yacht  Queen Anne's Revenge (1710) SS Andrea Doria (1952), SS Michelangelo (1962) , Queen Anne's Revenge (2nd model) USS/SS Leviathan (1914),  James B Colgate (1892),  POW bone model (circa 1800) restoration

 

Prior kit builds - AL Dallas, Mamoli Bounty. Bluejacket America, North River Diligence, Airfix Sovereign of the Seas

 

"Take big bites.  Moderation is for monks."  Robert A. Heinlein

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I poured the second rubber for the first two boxes, all went well. Then I started pouring for the final two boxes, and just as the stream started into the box I realized that I had not coated them with mould release! Retirement seems to have addled my brain. So I mopped it out, and will have to wait until it dries to make sure there is no rubber left from the aborted pour before starting again.

 

While waiting, I started working on the planking plan for the planks under the guns. I have copied the run of planks from Falconer. Next, working out the plank ends.

 

Michael, I should have paid more attention when you pointed out the coffee add under the moulds. It is even titled, "Wide Awake Coffee"...

 

Mark

IMG_8406.jpg

Screen Shot 2019-02-28 at 12.07.36 PM.png

2047628755_ScreenShot2019-02-20at11_57_23AM.thumb.png.298d5d946349fb1861f3f5ec28a5e18a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi druxey,

 

Retirement seemed like a good idea until I discovered that my brain flew out the window. When I was juggling a dozen things, I could still keep track of details. Now I have only one thing to juggle, the details slide away. Or, maybe it is aging!

 

So here are some decking questions, while my moulds dry.

 

I am laying out the decking for mounting the guns, likely building 5 strakes from the waterway to accommodate the length of the guns.

Do I have it right that a 3 or 4 shift planking plan has all of the butts falling on beams, not any ledges?  This means that the lengths of the strakes are quite irregular, given the irregular spacing of the gundeck beams (see above).

 

Is there any particular functional or historic reason to choose 3 or 4 shift planking? Goodwin suggests that weather decks were 4 shift, but I see no other information pertaining to the gundeck.

 

I am assuming that the planks taper at the bow and stern, as Falconer shows. I am also assuming that there is NOT a band of anchor or top and butt planking adjacent to the waterway in this ca. 1760 ship. Goodwin (p. 59) says that this practice came in only at the end of the 18th century.

 

Mark

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that the strakes of top and butt under the guns was adopted at some point in the 18th century, but exactly when is the question. Plank butts always fall on the beams, not the ledges. (Most ledges are only 3" or 4" wide, so there is insufficient landing to secure the ends on.) Also, avoid butts in the binding strakes opposite hatch openings. 

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, druxey, it is amazing how many details seem obvious until you start actually working with them.

 

The rubber pours were successful! No bubbles, good rendition of detail including the king's cypher.

 

I did have a moment of concern when the two halves intially would not pull apart, but once I peeled off the outer paper boxes, the rubber came away nicely.

 

Plaster of Paris sleeves next.

 

Mark

IMG_8408.jpg

IMG_8410.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! what is interesting mark is in looking at the last picture, it reminds me of those images that one sees occasionally where the image can be seen in one of two ways either a positive shape or a negative one. and the barrel appears to be raised up from the surrounding surface because of the lighting.

 

A beautiful surface indeed.

 

Michael

Current builds  Bristol Pilot Cutter 1:8;      Skipjack 19 foot Launch 1:8;       Herreshoff Buzzards Bay 14 1:8

Other projects  Pilot Cutter 1:500 ;   Maria, 1:2  Now just a memory    

Future model Gill Smith Catboat Pauline 1:8

Finished projects  A Bassett Lowke steamship Albertic 1:100  

 

Anything you can imagine is possible, when you put your mind to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up a cold on the plane back from our trip, which slowed me down the last week. But now better!

 

I initially tried building a Plaster of Paris sleeve around my moulds, to stabilize them and pull the two halves together securely. But I had trouble pulling them tight with tape before pouring the plaster; for some reason, this time, the tape just would not secure tightly to the rubber. And then I used old plaster, which was so lumpy and needed breaking up that it began to harden before I could pour it into the boxes. I had to throw all of that away.

 

Reading the Micro Mark instructions again (when in doubt, I keep telling myself, read the instructions), it suggested pressing the moulds halves between two pieces of wood. I initially tried that using clamps, but this distorted the mould and I cast an oval section gun.

 

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_2.jpg.b7c05eec3ea8f9dd6f5b017d64ebfda0.jpg

 

So then I tried holding them together with rubber bands (per the instructions), and this worked well.

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_4.jpg.f625b109029e9b271d5e4719295b6ec9.jpg

Here is the first cast:

 

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_3.jpg.8a93e7df909898212a1e1419eeedd8af.jpg

Once I cut off the gun head with a jeweler's saw, I clamped it in the lathe, using a chuck on the protruding end of the muzzle to center it, and then clamping it in a four jaw chuck using a split ring of wood.

 

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_5.jpg.49bd190fa2f293f8597584ace0a94bbd.jpg

 

Then I could drill for the bore, and face the end.

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_6.jpg.e15c7b875c24235228ff9ad5cf5a14dc.jpg

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_7.jpg.978777f236a383ff5060cdf9c08fed02.jpg

 And the result:

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_8.jpg.dbbb484dc6b26bfecb0581ae4a2e5360.jpg

zOBJ_Bellona_20190306_9.jpg.26348c135e91b9d8e9f36370467567c7.jpg

 

Needs a little filing to clean up the trunnions, but the process seems to work.

 

Mark

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...