Jump to content

BANYAN

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR
  • Posts

    5,587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BANYAN

  1. Hi Nathan. I used TurboCAD 2016 Pro to develop the plans for my HMCSS Victoria build (ongoing). TC 2016 allowed me to import either a PDF (PDF/Underlay manger) or raster image files (BMP, JPG etc), which if put on their own layer, aligned and scaled then locked, allow you to trace what you need - note they are separate tools in TC. The TC 2018 blurb states that the image manager has been improved in 2018 but my reading to date suggests that this is only to allow multiple image file import rather than interaction between the image and drawing layers (that is selection of parts of the image to convert/use in the CAD drawing). I would really like to know more about the TC 2018 image manager if anyone has any experience with it? In my drawings I have imported some large photographs and lithographs, and have had up to as many as 10 underlying images - visibility turned on and off as required - as background reference images (once scaled). However, I have experienced some issues with the images disappearing occasionally (the image holder remains) requiring reloading of the image. That said, I think that this is a problem of my own making by deleting or moving the parent file (as they are linked) by default. This could be overcome by embedding the image (an option in TC Image manger) but your drawing/TC file will become very large - or do not rename. move or delete your parent image files :). I have drawn up my plans with the wrong techniques with literally thousands of elements/entities as I am a self-taught absolute amateur - this resulted in me drawing every item individually (including each treenail head) instead of using blocks and symbols etc - lesson learned for next time . So the files could have been much smaller allowing some image embedding if required. Overall I have found that the image import, alignment and scaling for using as a background to trace in TC, is a relatively straight forward process once you get to grips with it. cheers Pat
  2. Hi Clare; I do not know how I missed this one - I hope you don't mind a late interloper looking in. Great subject vessel and a very nice build of such an unusual modelling subject. I have read through with great interest and look forward to your future installments. cheers Pat
  3. Hi all, again many thanks for looking in and the encouragement. Thanks for your valuable feedback and looking in again Eberhard - I think you are right; that seems the only practical way they may have done it. I'll continue looking for a reference. Thanks Carl, Denis and John, your comments are most appreciated - I have much to learn and improve on yet, especially better control of the files Hi Ed, your many tips and encouragement have been a great help. Yep, those 'races' are milled from a brass plug (inner) and plug receiver (outer). The real life ones were just a thin track on a wood base i believe, but at this scale a little difficult for my abilities just yet. I have been playing around with ideas of how to make the small square bases for the pins (2 x 2 mm) but cannot achieve a consistent product - I think that at this scale I will not use them but will add them to the 1:48 version I do later.
  4. Looks good Patrick and will look great over a properly prepared hul - you're doing well to resist the temptation mate. Mr. Bond? ... it is more like one of the very modern, luxuriously outfitted yachts one of his arch-nemesis with too much money would have - 007's would be smaller and fitted with more gizmos. cheers Pat
  5. Hi again folks, another small update. I have started work on the anchors - Trotman Pattern. The contract for Victoria specified 3 of these, two as Bowers and one as the stream, with the latter a little smaller/lighter. These anchors were assessed by a Committee in 1852 and rated as the strongest/best holding anchors (28% better) yet the Admiralty did not deviate from their "Admiralty pattern". These were an enhanced version of the Port/Hornibal pattern The earlier style of this anchor had the rounded/ovalish shank and the straight iron stock; the bent arm iron stock was not introduced until about 1860. The following photos show the construction of the first anchor from cut raw materials through to completed item. The shank was shaped from a single piece of thick brass then the holes drilled and the slot cut. The flukes were silver soldered to the shank then cleaned up. the stock was made in two parts to enable the ball ends to be turned as they would not fit through the 1mm hole; I don't know how they did this in real life as the is a conical stopper on one side of the stock and a pin on the other - if you look real close you can see I managed to add that detail. The hex head bolt and nut, and the shackle, were some purchased stock from another project, but fit perfectly for this job The anchor was blackened with Birchwood Casey Brass Black (diluted to 25%) The photos are in extreme close up as these are only 21mm long overall and as such show all the early scuffing from my filing before cleanup. The next two should look a little better as my technique improves. cheers Pat
  6. Looks very good Dave; you've done a grand job on the rigging - the blocks especially look good. cheers Pat
  7. Stunning carvings and they really enhance your work Karl. cheers Pat
  8. Hi Antonio, that looks like a good design for modelling purposes. I have putting making a couple off for some time but this may motivate me Did you anneal the metal at all? cheers Pat
  9. Looking very good patrick; she will be a beauty completed. cheers Pat
  10. Really nice work Karl, I especially like, and am impressed, that you were able to maintain a symmetrical and evenly spaced opening despite the tapering shape. cheers Pat
  11. Hi John, thanks for the kind comments; I hope I can live up to those lofty ideals Eberhard, many thanks again. You have hit the nail on the head. Speaking with my 3D man he said exactly the same, the trick is to print vertically which is the intention. That said, we may also machine a version and do a comparison - appreciate the feedback. cheers Pat
  12. Still in the waiting list despite several attempts to make a start Carl. Unfortunately the research side of my 'HMCSS Victoria' build is taking far too much of my time That said, i think I will break her out and have a go very soon - your new group build has 'wetted' the appetitite cheers Pat
  13. Great result O.C.; sometimes you have no option but to hold your breath and press on. cheers Pat
  14. Appreciate your feedback and recommendations Eberhard, and believe me we have given this some prior thought. The idea of printing the carriage bits is a good one and will probably go that way - should have thought of that myself As to the barrel, we wish to have some of the finer detail captured (cypher, gunlock and sight if possible). Turning will not allow that as easily. We have investigated various printing mediums etc and believe we can get a very good result from Ultra High Frosted Detail resin as can be seen here https://www.shapeways.com/shops/model_monkey?section=1%2F72+Ship+Weapons&s=0 I have had a ship printed (in parts) at 1:350 (HMAS Vampire) in this stuff and the detail is very good; even the gun barrels at that scale. We will not be using the same "home 3D" printer and medium we tried with the funnel but rather taking it to a local professional printer who can do this UFD printing a very reasonable price. I agree the stepping issues are a serious problem with regular 3D printing but this process seems to have nailed that problem if you look at what ModelMonkey is achieving (see his barrels on the above linked page)? Still open to discuss this if you think we are barking up the wrong tree and your valuable experience based suggestions/discussion are most welcomed. cheers Pat
  15. Hi Eberhard, thanks for looking in again. Nope these were machined from a large (and a small) brass ring (plug surround and a brass plug for the smaller). The outer is 26.5mm to the middle of the race, 2 mm high and 2.5mm wide; the inner is about 10.5mm to the middle. The guns will be a real challenge at this scale, especially to show those tiny wheels for excentrics etc. We have already decided to 3D pint in the barrel in UHD as it is a one-off gun. Not worth the while casting it as a coat of paint and it will look the same. The carriage I hope to make up in wood with most of the relevant detail attached. From my research I am fairly confident it is a 'Ferguson' carriage as per the earlier graphic; however the gun is a Blomefield 32pdr 56cwt rather than a Dundas modified Blomefield design (32pdr 42 cwt).
  16. Hi again folks; another small update. i am starting to add some gun details now and have completed milling and lather work for the pivot gun wheel races and the locking pins - the races are simply placed (not glued) to give an idea where they will fit so they are not centred to each other at the moment. The pins were frustrating to make as you can see they are very small - the bottom part is rough as that will be used t glue it into the deck. These pins are used to lock the lower carriage into one of the cardinal or intercardinal points. The idea was the gun pivoted on the rear fold down hinged clamp only with the forward one used to lock it on the bearing. The following photos show progress so far, and the graphic of the gun shows the pin arrangements. cheers Pat
  17. Ditto John; a very nice job on such an unusual (model) subject. cheers Pat
  18. Excellent adaption of those figures Steve - the paint work is excellent especially noting the size of the figures. cheers Pat
  19. Nice build concept and great subject matter guys; I'll pull up a chair and watch with interest. Some great history in those V&W Class destroyers. cheers Pat
  20. Looks great Dave, preassembly of similar items is definitely the way to go. cheers Pat
×
×
  • Create New...