Jump to content

BANYAN

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR
  • Posts

    5,536
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BANYAN

  1. Hi again all. Thanks for the pointer to the painting jbshan. On closer inspection I think it does accord with Druxey's observations. I found a higher res of the painting at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Cleveley_the_Younger,_HMS_Resolution_and_Discovery_in_Tahiti.jpg The foot of the hoist appears to be in exactly the same sort of relative position to the rail as RMG painting? edit: oops - on review (zoomed) it appears this Ensignis larger in physical size BUT... it is being flown from from the gaff halyard and not the Ensign Staff. I think, for my purpose​, that the proposed rule-of-thumb will suffice? cheers Pat
  2. Thanks all, appreciate the feedback and pointers. I think the best estimate I can make is to follow Druxey's advice and base it on the visual evidence of conntemporarty paintings, drawings and models which equates to the 'hoist' being approx. 2/3rds the length of the staff. Once I have calculated this for my model (at 1:60) I'll see if Model flags has an existing size (they do 10 sizes of the Red Ensign for this period, so I should get something fairly close (I hope) Once of have established this size I will order a jack that equates to the same size as that used in the selected ensign. Thanks again all. Pat
  3. Thanks for the rule of thumb Druxey; appreciated. Thanks Mark, a handy site. Once I work out the approximate scale size using Druxey's guidance I will order something close to the size. cheers Pat
  4. Hi folks, I am starting to research the appropriate flags to fly from my HM Bark Endeavour (c1770) depicted in harbour - so Ensign to be flown from ensign staff aft, andUnion Flag (Jack) from the jack staff fwd. From other discussions in this forum I have established the correct ensign to fly (as shown below): I am assuming the design of the Jack will be the same as depicted in the top left corner of the Ensign - that is, NO red diagonal cross? From the CRW Flags website and BR 20 (thanks for the links in your other postings Beef Wellington) I have been able to determine that the appropriate ratios for size (width : length) is: 1:2 for the Ensign, and 3:5 for the Jack What I am trying to establish however is whether there is a standard/rule for the actual size of the flags (per ship rate/size) etc? What would be the actual size for the Endeavour to fly? Any help will be most welcomed. cheers Pat
  5. Agreewith Greg; I think that is why Marquardt shows hooks and tackle for these stays rather than fixed rigging as in other publications - so they can be removed. cheers Pat
  6. Steve, could you post a piccy of those cutters please. I have a pair of electronics flush faced cutters, but they mangle the thread at the edge of the cut - perhaps the brand (quality) may be crucial? Neat solution to the eye; I'll try that. cheers Pat
  7. That is one heck of a "work of art" delivered by a very talented artisan Remco - a wonderful legacy you leave us mere mortals to follow cheers Pat
  8. More than a little impressed Steve; that is a major undertaking repeating that level of detail over 12 shroud sets! I tried at scale 1:60 but just too fiddly for my 'fat' fingers and had enough issues with clove/restrictor hitch terminations. cheers Pat
  9. Thanks Steve and JB. Steve that photo is perfect - many thanks for that - much appreciate the rapid response. I was a bit puzzled by marquardt's depiction as i could not see a 'seaman' like way to utilise a central line either end; the spreaders make much more practical sense. cheers Pat
  10. HKC - I hope you don't mind me high jacking your thread after such a long period of inactivity? In the Endeavour AOTS, this netting is referenced as being for the staysail ( to hold the 'bundle' when lowered). My question is how it was rigged circa 1770. the AOTS shows only a side view. In this view there is a 'horse' which I am presuming is one each side. I initially assumed the netting was fixed between these but there also appears to be a small eye ring centrally placed at either end fixed to the boom collar (fwd side) and boom cap (aft side) to which the net was attached. Would I be right in assuming that it was fitted between the horses (hitched) to act as spreaders and the central eye rings to give fore and aft support to the net? OR was it hung more like a hammock? Any pointers/suggestions appreciated as there is nothing in Lees, Lever, Marquardt, Harland or Falconer (that I can find) to provide this detail. cheers Pat
  11. Thanks all for looking in. ca shipwright - More ships??? Flat out keeping up with what I have in the shipyard Good to see you back in the dockyard Mike. Greg, Popeye - unfortunately retiring 5 years earlier than planned for health reasons - get some quality of life in while I can. My complaints however are minor compared to many! cheers Pat
  12. Thanks Mark and back at you - I hope you and yours had a great festive season With the Death Star commissioned I am sure 2016 will be a great modelling year. cheers Pat
  13. So what was this about blemish lines - can't see them standing up this way Looks great Mark! cheers Pat
  14. Thanks Popeye, ditto. I also hope you and your family had a great festive season and have much to look forward to in 2016. cheers Pat
  15. Great progress Greg - looking very good indeed. At this pace you'll be finished by NYD cheers Pat
  16. Coming along rapidly and looking great Danny; must be a bit of a doddle after the full shiop model? cheers Pat
  17. Thanks again to all those whom have looked in and "liked' - appreciate you dropping by. Hi Per great to see you drop in; thanks for your very positive comments. The AOTS has been very helpful with this build. It's going to be a very hot summer this year; lucky for us a cooler Christmas as we have some major bushfires just down the road from us on the "Great Ocean Road" with some 120 properties/homes lost already; the cooler weather had allowed the firefighters a little respite to try and control it. Warming up again later this week - we have already had a couple of days in the 4o+ Cel. range - good excuse for a couple of 'frosties' (beers) cheers Pat
  18. Nice work on the stern Mark; ditto John's remarks. We tend to be harder on ourselves than others and mostly the small issues you identify are only visible under harsh (bright) light and close-up photography - the real thing was probably a lot rougher to the eye than you have produced. cheers Pat
  19. Thanks for looking in folks and the comments Mark and John - appreciate the interest and encouragement. cheers Pat
  20. Well the 'knitting' is now done with all ratlines finished That is milestone completed and another started with a good start made on the jib and spritsail yards. cheers Pat
  21. Those guns look great Greg - looka like you are just having too much fun with plastic- any chance of a return to the dark side? cheers Pat
  22. Great update John; she is coming along very nicely. Our best wishes to you and your lovely wife for a happy and safe festive season and a great modelling 2016. cheers Pat
×
×
  • Create New...