Jump to content

BANYAN

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR
  • Posts

    5,647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BANYAN

  1. Ah Mark, I see you have made the acquaintance of the mate of the one-armed bricklayer cheers Pat
  2. Some very nice adaptions there Keith; I might copy a few of those (You haven't patented them yet have you ) cheers Pat
  3. Ditto on the corner posts; the finished effect will look really nice and will be as I recall how it was done on the rebuild of an actual pearler (PAM) I have seen down here in Melbourne. cheers Pat
  4. G'day Les. I have found those cheaper 'third hand' devices with plain alligator clips not suited to smaller soldering jobs also. I have invested in the GRS rig which jewellers and the like prefer; not cheap but do a much better job. I think it may have been REMCO that also discussed a soldering block which was about 10cm x 10cm or so, and was honeycombed to accept small brass or steel pins which held smaller pieces in situ and you could apply a naked flame to the joint. Can't find the post at the moment but if I do I'll update this post. cheers Pat
  5. Wefalck, that is some beautiful workmansip from an obviously talented machinest. Bravo! Pat
  6. Braver man than me mate; I cut the metal heads off and glued them to the replacement carrick bits (cheating??? ---- nuh ) cheers Pat
  7. Excellent job there Greg; that detail looks really good - love to see this model in the real world as someimes photos just don't do justice and this looks a really nice model. cheers Pat
  8. Good job Ron, still doing mine; port side completed today (lower and upper) - now for the other side. cheers Pat
  9. Mark is probably on the right track, but could I ask where these are in relation to the position of the Cathead? In these ships at that time, some ships had 'whiskers' fitted to the Cathead and these may be related to the lead and securing of the associated rigging? Another option may be that they are the lead and securing for the anchor trip mechanism (on the Cathead) which was commonly fitted during this era. cheers Pat
  10. Hi Boris; I am also building the AL. My two cents worth: 1. The hull is accurately proportioned and is double planked as per your preference. 2. The brass decorations are a mixed bag. The quarter badges and some scroll/figures are OK but the transom piece and window column scrolls are poor 3. Plans are OK for what they are but the rigging is not accurate for the period or practice (use James Lees and Steel to supplement). I replaced all the rigging materials 4. Instructions are poor but as you are an experienced builder I think you would be OK with them. 5. I scratch built all the upperdeck fittings and equipment using the AOTS (Marquardt), Ray Parkin's book and the replica build as source information. Hope that helps you? cheers Pat
  11. Great idea Danny, you see some exquisite models in museums and often ponder about the internals; a neat way to show this. I know you have just started but any ideas of a full made up mast (no rigging) as a separate item also? cheers Pat
  12. Ron, there are a couple of free graph paper apps on line (just Google) that allow you to specify spacing (Major and minor units) and set the associated line weights. I can't recal the one I used at the moment but should be easily found. I simple printed off a couple of A4 sheets then uses these as my background template by using hair clips to temp pin the m to the shrouds. You can see what I mean towards the latter posts in my log. http://modelshipworld.com/index.php/topic/400-hmb-endeavour-by-banyan-al-160-circa-1768/page-12 cheers Pat
  13. Hi Ron, I went with 13" actual spacing. Not sure of your scale, but you should be able to sort that - my simple formula is 13 x 25.4 = about 330mm (330.2 actually) then divide by the scale; in my case 1:60 which results in a 5.5mm spacing. 10mm seems to be a bit large unless you are building at a much different scale? cheers Pat
  14. Hi Andrew and a belated welcome to the Endeavour (and in particular the AL kit) builders club Your build is coming along very nicely and I see you avoided my mistake of having the hawse holes misaligned with the deck - nice catch. For my build, I basically ignored everything AL provided once I completed the side planking. What are your plans? cheers Pat
  15. Your Titanic is looking very good; some nice detail there Popeye. You're going to have to speak to the boss and let him/her know that the MSW forum believes you should be full-time on the model - PR for them so to speak cheers Pat
  16. No probs Dave, glad to hear it worked out well. I have left the swivels, anchors etc for the very last fit - as Greg stated, too easy to snag get in the way of the rigging. I am also leaving the jib boom for as long as I can for the same reasons. One of the last things I will fit are the delicate items such as the deadlights, quarter window shutters etc. cheers Pat
×
×
  • Create New...