Jump to content

Mike Y

Members
  • Posts

    1,437
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mike Y

  1. Working on the keelson.

    Decided not to rely on the plans due to possible error here and there, and fit it to the hull instead.

     

    Fixing the keelson parts to the hull with masking tape:

    post-5430-0-40410400-1474740376_thumb.jpg

     

    Marking frame boundaries:

    post-5430-0-77970700-1474740374_thumb.jpg

     

    Keelson markup completed:

    post-5430-0-19718100-1474740378_thumb.jpg

     

    First fit after milling, some notches are not wide enough. Three iterations on a mill were required, because these pencil marks are not precise enough (hard to get the pencil right, the angle was awkward):

    post-5430-0-81050500-1474740378_thumb.jpg

     

    After the fitting. Will need to make some notches deeper to avoid gaps:

    post-5430-0-39880100-1474740379_thumb.jpg

     

    Now rinse and repeat!

  2. Bill,

     

    "Hahn style" involves a lot and the modeler can go with as much or as little as they wish.  As Mike pointed out, there's stylized framing, the jig for working upside down (and also right side for the interior).  There's also minimal if any carlings used during decking process.  No knees, etc.  Simplified keel, stem, and stern deadwood.  I'm thinking there's a bit more but I'm in the middle of a "senior moment" on those points.

    Few cents: I am not sure if simplification is a part of the style (except framing). I thought it is more of "let's leave some details up to the builder".

     

    Bill, here is a link to the Oliver Cromwell plans preview from Lumberyard website (the preview is distorted and not suitavle for building, you need to purchase real plans to build): http://www.dlumberyard.com/Plans/cromwell.pdf

    As you can see, some things are simplified. Like Mark mentolned - knees, carlings, deadwood, stem, stern,

    But nothing stops the builder from reading up and making a correct version instead of simplified one, like I did. It will not change the "style".

    However if you change the framing style - it would not be a Hahn style anymore.

    But it is really a fuzzy term. Hahn was "anti-purist", so hope he would not mind people deviating from his plans even if building from them :)

  3. Hi John,

     

    Thanks!

    The scrapers are amazing, I am using them very often now. They are removing much more material than xacto blades, and they can get into any small places because of the small size. The edge do not have any dents. 

    Bought them here: http://www.axminster.co.uk/lynx-mini-cabinet-scraper-set-504698

    I also discovered them on MSW in somebody's build log, but forgot who that was...

     

    Quick googling shows that you can buy them in US, for example, here: 

    http://www.woodcraft.com/product/158977/lynx-mini-scraper-set-4pc.aspx

    http://www.grizzly.com/products/Lynx-Mini-Scraper-Set/T26658?utm_campaign=zPage

    http://www.japanwoodworker.com/Product/158977/Lynx-Mini-Scraper-Set-4pc.aspx

    etc etc 

  4. Hm! Amazing bending, will try that as well. Maybe ebony wales are not as messy as I thought?

     

    Two cents about pink ivory: Stiles and Bates does not ship wood outside UK.

    I bought it here instead: http://www.exotichardwoodsukltd.com

    Not sure about US, but shipping to Sweden was not a problem.

    Got two big fat billets, they are amazing!

  5. Thanks John!

     

    Finishing the planks with some sandpaper, mini scrapers and xacto blades. The mini scrapers were surprisingly useful!

    Covered the frames with the masking tape to avoid scratching them accidentally:

     

    post-5430-0-11278700-1473705801_thumb.jpg

     

    post-5430-0-28787800-1473705802_thumb.jpg

     

    Final result, with tung oil applied.

     

    post-5430-0-89840800-1473705475_thumb.jpg

     

    post-5430-0-45833900-1473705477_thumb.jpg

     

    The exposed side of the hull would be left as is (with deck framing, of course), things like breasthook, fore and mizen mast steps, etc - would be cut in half with one side omitted. That is to avoid obstructing the view through the hull.

    If something will need to be glued to the finished side - will use treenails and/or monofilament. Or epoxy.

    But hope it will not happen :)

  6. Shaping the clamp ends in situ was a bit tricky..

    post-5430-0-55410900-1473605886_thumb.jpg

     

    post-5430-0-43961600-1473605887_thumb.jpg

     

    Transom wings were shaped with sandpaper and scrapers and finished with xacto blade:

    post-5430-0-45936600-1473605888_thumb.jpg

     

    Result:

    post-5430-0-69051400-1473605889_thumb.jpg

     

    It is still clear that transom wings are made out of two pieces, and the gap between the pieces is still visible, but it is kind of better than it was. Sigh... Will do better transom on the next model!

    Luckily it looks good from the outside, and the inner part of the transom would be barely visible under three layers of deck framing ;)

  7. Just realised that I screwed up the transom a bit.

    For some reason I thought that inner planking and deck clamps in that area fully cover the transom wings. Also, I was expecting some sort of stemson, but at the stern. I thought that inner planking will terminate there.

    Well, I was wrong. TFFM and other build logs indicate that transom wings are just left open, and inner planking terminates on the rear-most cant frame.

     

    Like here, on Remco's Kingfisher:

    post-5430-0-86781700-1473280067_thumb.jpg

     

    Or on Albert's Naiad:

    post-5430-0-11076400-1473280378.jpg

     

    And here is what I have. Nevermind the glue spots on the clamps, they are not sanded or scraped yet, but you can see that they expect to terminate on some big timber in the middle of the transom (which, apparenly, does not exist), and the wings are ugly on the right side, because I was going to hide them under planking. Whoops! :)

    post-5430-0-49895600-1473276232_thumb.jpg

     

    post-5430-0-84576300-1473276233_thumb.jpg

     

    Will try to reduce the impact of the screw-up by shaping the transom wings carefully, so they will look nicer. Shaping them in such confined space is a challenge, but seems like I have no choice.

    Luckily, that area would be barely visible under multiple layers of deck framing, but it is not an excuse to leave it in such a bad shape! :)

  8. Found a nice color scheme in this beautiful cross section, made by Maurys.

    Darker wood above wales (looks like pear), lighter below. With a subtle colour variation where lighter pear goes lower, and darker pear is higher. Or it is just a lighting? Anyway:

    post-5430-0-94822300-1472850195_thumb.jpg

    Link to his build log with the rest of the photos:

    http://modelshipworld.com/index.php?/topic/513-echo-cross-section-by-maury/

     

    Another one is Naiad by Albert. Careful mix of lighter and darker pear in the deck framing:

    post-5430-0-32999400-1472850706.jpg

    The full log: http://modelshipworld.com/index.php/topic/3443-hms-naiad-1797-by-albert-148

  9. Carl, yes, even this "drill" is better than manual drilling. It is just a pity that there is nothing in the market for a proper quality micro drills. All drills I found while googling were similar hand-made "cheap motor + chuck + few wires" construction. I love working with good tools, this one is not pleasure to work with, but it gets the job done.

     

    Many thanks to Gaetan, now my livingroom corner looks even more like a shipyard, with the Arsenal de Toulon drawing on a wall ;)

     

    post-5430-0-87746700-1472562740_thumb.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...