Jump to content

Jim Lad

Moderators
  • Posts

    9,197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim Lad

  1. Lars, As the Vespucci's spanker gaff is "standing" - ie it doesn't hoist with the sail - it would be more usual for it to be fitted with a gooseneck rather than jaws as shown, but i can't find a photo of the ship that shows the gaff clearly. Do you have any photos of that area of the ship? John
  2. Mark, The storage buildings are airlocked and temperature/humidity controlled, but seeing those models sitting on the floor where workmen carry stuff in and out is certainly a bit scarey! John
  3. Andy, Sounds like it was the quality of your original wood that was causing the problem, but I'm glad to see that you've beaten it! Matbe for your next model you could scratch build your current ship - slightly less rigging! John
  4. I'm sure it's worthy, Danny, but what's the name of the ship! John
  5. While photographing the Sirius, I was also able to take a few photos of the Finecraft Models Pty Ltd model of Endeavour, which is also in storage at Castle Hill and rarely available for viewing. I thought some photos of this model would give Endeavour builders another perspective on this famous ship. The same conditions of very poor light and hence slow shutter speeds also applied to this model. John
  6. And a few photos of the masts and rigging. John
  7. As the Sirius is now available in kit form and is being built (or planned) by some of our members, I thought these photos may be of interest. The Ingleton model of the Sirius is in storage at the Powerhouse Museum's storage faciliy at Castle Hill (Sydney). I was able to visit the storage area this morning and take a few photos. Some of the photos aren't great as the light was pretty poor and no flash was permitted, but I thought they may be helpful for anyone building or researching the Sirius. First, some photos of the hull and deck. John
  8. Augie, How can Alcoa carry any weight? (1) Alunimium doesn't weigh very much at all, and (2) They can't spell! OK, I'll shut up now! John
  9. I've been quiet here for a bit as working is stytene is ouitside my experience, but I think I have to agree with Tom that the windows are flat. I think the reflection in the windows of the sunken ferry are creating an illusion of a bent window. On a purely practical note, I think windows other than flat would be very rare indeed on this type of craft - but maybe in America they built ferrys like that? John
  10. Great to hear that you're feelong better at last, Kats! Welcome back to the work bench. John
  11. Brighten your day; liven up your breath; try all new minty mast. Available from your local supermarket now!! Sorry about the mast, Andy, but at least you seem to have taught a couple of Yanks to spell 'colour'. Now, if you can all just learn to say alumin - i - um! John
  12. Andy, You've obviously read that popular book, "How to talk gooder English." John
  13. A late entrant into the 'full nine yards' controversy. A Vickers machine gun ammunition belt held 250 rounds and was 20 feet long when empty (shorter when loaded) and so was 7 feet short of nine yards. The U.S. Browning .50 machine gun however, had a metal link belt of 350 rounds which, at 13 rounds per foot, gives 351 rounds exactly for nine yards. Make of it what you will! John PS. Nice masts, Andy!
  14. Mate, your model is always worth another photo to show us! Have fun with the family. John
  15. Pat, Thanks for showing us some details of a very different way of modelling! John
  16. I usually model at 1:96 but go to 1:48 for smaller vessels. I started at 1:96 simply due to space considerations, but found it to be such fun at that scale that I stick with it unless the size of the original would make the model too small. John
  17. Jist catching up, Toni. Nice job on the re-work (says he, the master of understatement)! John
  18. Good to hear that your health's OK, Meredith! You've made a good start to your 'Syren', too! I'll just sit back and enjoy the show! John
  19. You're right Druxey. Quickly doing the arithmetic, 7-10-7 is almost exact! John
×
×
  • Create New...