Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

@matiz

 

Hello Tiziano,

thank you for your nice comment.

I'm particularly pleased to receive such praise from such a fantastic model maker.

Of course I would also like to thank everyone else for the LIKES.

 

Hello fellow model builders,
today I would like to present to you my new video about the yards and spars of the La Créole.
I hope you enjoy it: LINK

 

Edited by archjofo
Posted

Hello colleagues,

Today I would like to thank you all for the positive reactions to my last video. Because of my son's house construction, which of course requires a lot of my time as a retired architect, I have hardly had time to do any model building lately. So I at least enjoyed putting together a video.

But things will continue here soon...
 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Addition of the lifts of the lower yards - Balancines de basse vergue
Usually, as can be read in the specialist literature in the book "Manuel de gréement" by F. A. Coste, Paris 1829, the lifts of the lower yards were secured using tackles, each at the height of the 2nd shroud of the respective lower mast. This is also how J. Boudriot illustrated it in the monograph on La Créole, as shown below.

Toppnanten_Fockmast_LaCreole.jpg.46f4223a8db06583105b0280c54f1760.jpg

Source: Monograph La Créole by Jean Boudriot

 

On the original Paris model, I identified the lifts as shown in a diagram:

IMG_4121.thumb.jpg.88202fd623692f0633068e4da91ad3d5.jpg

 

Source: Musée national de la Marine de Paris - La Créole

 

However, no tackles can be seen there. The lifts were simply attached to the upper part of the tackle ropes at the height of the 2nd shroud. This easier handling of the lifts could have been due to the size of the ship, or is it a simplification by the contemporary model maker?
We will never be able to find out.
However, I find this type of seamanlike handling of the lifts rather impractical and have therefore decided to use tackles, whose ropes can then be properly secured on the inside.
I wouldn't exactly describe my model as a "pile of evidence" as a dear forum colleague once described his project. However, I have implemented a large number of details on the model that seemed plausible to me after research. I cannot provide 100% proof of this, but solutions that actually existed and generally fit into the temporal and country-specific context of La Créole.
In this respect, I will basically attach the lifts as follows:

Atlas_genie_du_maritime_Balancines_Pl.20_annexe1.thumb.jpg.6083a86da1143272a63fd1e4e9e179ff.jpg

Source: Excerpt from Atlas du Génie Maritime annexe N.1, Pl. 20

 

However, I will only use a double block at the top and a single block at the bottom for the tackle.
To be continued...
 

Posted

I believe that is a very workable solution Johann. It is, of course, preferable to use the contemporary model as a primary source but I think sometimes we take these models as gospel. It is possible that the original builder made errors, took time saving shortcuts or omitted details because of any reason you could think of that is just as relevant to us modern builders. Perhaps, being near the end of the rigging process he just wanted to be done and chose this quick and easy method to end the line. I do know that, in 150 years, someone making a model of your model will have the most complete and well researched Creole model ever built.

Greg

website
Admiralty Models

moderator Echo Cross-section build
Admiralty Models Cross-section Build

Finished build
Pegasus, 1776, cross-section

Current build
Speedwell, 1752

Posted

@dvm27

 

Hello Greg,

I'm extremely pleased that such a profound and excellent model maker sees it the same way as I do.

In 150 years there probably won't be much left of the silk rigging.
But since I have documented everything in detail, the model could be easily restored ... 😉

Posted
3 hours ago, archjofo said:

the model could be easily restored

 Only by someone with your modeling and rigging abilities and I dare say it would be anything but easy. 

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

@Keith Black

Thank you for your nice comment.

 

Continuation: Addition of the lifts of the lower yards – Balancines de basse vergue
In the last post I described why and how I will carry out the tackles of the lifts from the lower yards. I have drawn a corresponding sketch for this.
First I made a swivel for this, as can be seen in the following picture. It was made in the same way as the swivel hooks for the topsail halyards.
Two opposing notches are filed into a brass disk d = 0.3 mm with a ø 2.3 mm and a bore ø 0.8 mm, which then accommodate the ø 0.4 mm thick brass bow wire for soldering. The eyebolt is secured so that it can rotate freely with a soldered brass sleeve.

Next, the double and single blocks for the tackles have to be made. I will again equip the larger blocks for the lifts of the main and fore yard with real disks.

DSC066750_wett.jpg.8dc1a3d44b34cbf62fe63f8ab524dbb0.jpg

DSC066751_wett.jpg.f707a1d70337a80a413a775fcd5221bf.jpg

At this point I would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas and a good start into the New Year!

 

Posted

Johann, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours.

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

@Keith Black

@MarcM

Thank you very much for your support.
Thanks to everyone else too for the LIKES.

 

Completion: Addition of the lifts of the lower yards - Balancines de basse vergue
As I wrote before, I always make the blocks based on a theme, such as here for the tackles of the lifts of the lower yards.
Among other things, this ensures that I produce exactly the required quantity in the required size and thus do not produce excess capacity.
This also keeps you motivated and does not become monotonous, which can ultimately take away your desire to craft. However, this does not necessarily work for everyone.
Accordingly, I made 4 double blocks with a length of 5.6 mm, 4 single blocks with a length of 5.6 mm, 2 double blocks with a length of 4.0 mm and 2 single blocks with a length of 4.0 m.
I have already described the method of making the blocks many times in my construction report.
A few pictures are below.

DSC02215.thumb.jpg.04d7a7cfbc75cd38623f0b29aee9237f.jpg

DSC02239.thumb.jpg.edc40a7a77c4673d437390c369edff49.jpg

DSC02242.thumb.jpg.3e9c119ee2595c917dc2d143d8a0bca5.jpg

DSC02244.thumb.jpg.c1ea91111e21658fdfea1425ed8ad0db.jpg

After making the eyebolts with thimbles for attaching the tackles to the rigging, I was able to tie the single blocks into block strops and add the tackle ropes.

DSC02248.thumb.jpg.60b0d46e8426dfe93d952718895839e0.jpg

The last picture shows the finished tackles for the lifts of the lower yards.

DSC02251.thumb.jpg.c3af3be5885bb3000a801192c7a02648.jpg

We will continue in the new year with the last blocks in the area of the topgallant masts.

 

Posted

@albert

I am very pleased and grateful for such nice comments.
Of course, professional advice and comments, even critical ones, are also welcome.
Nobody is perfect and life is a constant learning process.
Here are some more details:

 

Additional blocks, including in the area of the topmast crosstrees
I should have recorded most of the blocks for the La Créole by now. The blocks in the area of the topmast crosstrees and on the mainmast cap still need to be made, as can be seen in the following pictures. These are blocks for guiding leech lines, braces and bowlines.
When guiding the braces for the mizzen topgallant yard, I am following the Paris model, where they go to the mainmast cap. The variant shown by J. Boudriot in the monograph, guiding the braces to the main topmast crosstrees, seems less practical to me for stability reasons on the high-rigged corvette.

Gromast_Eselshaupt_LaCreole.thumb.jpg.f8cded20587a0438b81f962a38143968.jpg

Kreuzstengetop_LaCreole_sw.thumb.jpg.5c480f07ebe4d6f45d10b1646b796977.jpgMarsstengetop_LaCreole_sw.thumb.jpg.cdb06b39873457008133884ef84bd7ed.jpg

 

In addition to making these blocks, I am currently still trying to figure out which blocks I still need for the upper area of the rigging on the royal topgallant crosstrees. I don't think there will be too many left.

To be continued...
Feedback geben
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...