Jump to content

allanyed

NRG Member
  • Posts

    8,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by allanyed

  1. Rivets/nails in copper plates are like belaying pins, rarely to scale if they are not made in house. Many a model with an otherwise beautifully made hull has been ruined by using copper plates with nails or pock marks from a ponce wheel that are not nearly close to scale. The photo Gregory posted is the best explanation I have seen. There appear to be about 60 on the long side. Assuming it is a four foot long piece, that is one every 0.8" or so. At a scale of 1:48 they are only 0.016 center to center. At 1:64 they are only 0.0125 center to center, smaller than the diameter of a #80 drill bit. Allan
  2. Gregory, good catch. This is the equivalent of about 1/2" thick at 1:48 According to Goodwin in The Construction and Fitting of the English Man of War, each plate was about 4 feet long by 15 inches wide and weighed 28 ounces per square foot. My apologies if my math is off, it has been a while...... Copper weighs about 0.34 pounds per cubic inch so I came up with a thickness of 0.19" At 1:48 scale this would be 0.1 mm. At 1:64 it would be 0.07mm, and at 1:98 it would be 0.05mm thick. 0.3 mm would be right if the scale is about 1:16 which would be a model in the neighborhood of 8 or 9 feet long which would be awesome. Allan
  3. Welcome to MSW Eswee Hope you will post a little introduction about yourself in the new member forum. Did you do a search on the various build logs? There are quite a few posts on various methods of making the plates, rivet replication and installing them. Cheers Allan
  4. It could be that the stanchions are extensions of some of the frames not necessarily separate pieces. See Ed Tosti's build of Young America. If not and they indeed are separate pieces, the following drawing of a schooner of 1896 shows one example of how they were set up between the frames. For the size If you have the width and moulded dimensions of the top timbers of the frames these may be a guide to the size of the stanchions. For sure the moulded dimension would be the same even if separate pieces not frame extensions. Looking at the photo of the MC held by the Cumberland County Museum in Nova Scotia, the bulwarks appear to run up to the cap rail, not open as you point out. Odd that the artist shows them exposed which was not uncommon on older vessels. Maybe just his interpretation unless she was so fitted at some point in her lifetime before the photo at the museum was taken. Hope this helps. Allan
  5. Karl, The model is gorgeous. As the drawings are from Boudriot, I assume it is a French 74. I see some differences compared to English 74's, such as there are four tackles per gun on the lower deck versus three on the British 74's. The British 74's had 32 pounders, and I think the French had 36's so maybe that is the reason for the difference. Two training tackles would surely make it easier for the gun crew when they had to be used. Beautiful job!
  6. This first photo is of a wood belaying pin that has been stained black and varnished. It is from the HMS Discovery 1925. The next one is from HMS Coriolanus 1876 and is made of metal and the paint long gone. The last one is from HMS Worcester 1860 and is wood, and very dark in color. I see no way of knowing for sure what was on Beagle, be it painted wood or metal or unpainted wood. If that is indeed the case, you probably cannot be faulted no matter what you choose, but based on contemporary models, wood color is probably most appropriate. If you go with brass you can darken them without making them totally black. Birchwood Technologies makes an antique brown gel for brass and copper that could be just the ticket for you. Allan
  7. Bruce, Absolutely mesmerizing account. Thank you for posting this!! Allan
  8. Patrick, not only is your attention to detail impressive, the execution in getting the details completed is just as impressive. Well done. Allan
  9. Your build is super. There is bashing, and then there is bashing. The fact that you went out of your way to get the NMM plans for Sherbourne is fantastic. Can't remember other kit builders doing this, but if they did, kudos to you and to them as well. Allan
  10. Lucien, I am curious to see the answer as well. The length, assuming your scale is 1:60 is about right at 19" so hopefully the shape is right. The handle diameter should be about 2" real world (0.033" or .84mm) This is very small and maybe weak if they are wood. For this size, you may be better off with brass pins that are painted a wood color. I scaled the top picture in CAD and the handle diameter is way oversized at about 3.5", nearly double what they should be. They do look better than most but once in a pin rack, they will not look right. As was posted quite a while ago by another member, try to put your hand around a too large diameter rod and you will understand better why this would not work. The photo has a can 3.25" diameter so it would be even more uncomfortable and hard to hold a pin that is 3.5" diameter. Again, the ones in the photo do look better than many other but they are really not close to scale. Allan
  11. Welcome aboard MSW David!! You choices are extremely well thought out. So many (including me) start off with a 1st rate ship of the line and struggle for months. Per the above, do start a build log and you will have a lot of help from the membership if you hit a bump in the road. Allan
  12. Gary, First and foremost, she is looking great!! Not 100% sure about Confederacy, but raised letters on the stern are a modeling thing, not what was really done as they were painted on if the name was even there which was not normally the case. The names of the ships were painted on British ships only for a short period in the late 18th century but then stopped by order of the Admiralty as they wanted to give as little information to the enemy as possible. Maybe too late for your Confederacy as they look to be glued on, but something to consider for the next project. Again, very nice work!! Allan
  13. Do the instructions give each size an ID number and then show where they go on the model? For carronades, I don't have information for American ships, but for the British, it varied with time, size, and design of the carronade carriage. Can you post a picture of the carronade carriages and carronades? The split rings should be soldered into a solid ring regardless of where they are being used. This is near impossible to do in-place so best to do the soldering before using them. Once soldered they can be cleaned up and blackened chemically or with paint. Hopefully the rough sketch below will explain better than words. Allan
  14. Glenn, Meticulous build and very clear and informative photographs that not only help others, but inspire everyone of us. Well done. Allan
  15. BE, Going back a few days/weeks, how did you silver solder the beads on the crown without any falling off as you soldered the next ones? I have used several different solders with three different melt points, but that would not work with so many beads. I sometimes use clips as heat sinks on the first items soldered, but on this small and delicate piece, I would love to hear your secret. The entire project looks great ! Allan
  16. The build is magnificent overall, but I especially like your blocks. Amazing what can be done with modern tools compared to the old days. The problem is that every time I see what can be done by folks like you, it makes me want to spend money on the latest technology. Thankfully my accountant/admiral/wife asks me to wait and see if I really need it. Saved us LOTS of money over the years. Allan
  17. As always your work is an inspiration to those interested in working with watercolors. Beautiful. Allan
  18. Hi CC, Welcome to MSW. You now have upwards of 40,000 advisors to answer any questions you have in your journey. Allan
  19. Welcome to the fray Bob!!! Allan
  20. Kent Years ago I found that these are limited to a few diameters and do not work any better than a simple steel draw plate. Most treenails are from 1" to 1.5" diameter so scale sizes for 1:48 would be from 0.02 to 0.03 and for 1:64, they would be .015 to .023. Obviously smaller needs for smaller scales, but treenails on scales less than 1:64 are VERY difficult to make with any device and usually wind up making the model look like it has the measles. There are so many models shown here that are excellent, then some are ruined with out of scale treenails. They serve little purpose for strength unless you use bamboo which works beautifully with a good quality draw plate such as the ones offered by one of our sponsors, Jim Byrnes. I am only speaking from my own experience. Others have gone to monofilament and other solutions. Again, be wary of making oversized trennals, regardless of the method you choose. Allan
  21. Paul, Your workmanship is a delight to follow. Victory models have been done so many times, including two that I did, lo those many years ago but yours is exceptional in the details. Allan
  22. Red, Your first time out is really good, better than most of us (meaning mostly me) did when we got the bug to get into this hobby of ours. Hope to see more from down the road. Allan
  23. As a big fan of schooners I love seeing a framed versus bulkhead model progressing so well. She looks really good Maury! Do you plan to leave off a few pieces of planking to show off your work on the frames? I think it would add a very nice touch and give viewers a better appreciation of what you have gone through. Allan
  24. Thank you very much for posting these photos. Worth far more than a thousand words to be sure!!! Allan
×
×
  • Create New...