Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

that is beautiful 

Posted
9 hours ago, Blue Ensign said:

Unlike Sphinx, Chris opted not to provide  a laser etched wale, and indicated use of three 5mm strips for the purpose. 

On my 'Indy' the wales are made up of four strakes of Top and Butt planking which I felt  provided a more authentic look.

A-ha! I saw the planking pattern and assumed it was the one piece approach. Superb work on making your own Top & Butt planking, a very nice touch.

 

Ron

Director, Nautical Research Guild

Secretary/Newsletter Editor, Philadelphia Ship Model Society

Former Member/Secretary for the Connecticut Marine Model Society

 

Current Build: Grace & Peace (Wyoming, 6-masted Schooner)

Completed Builds: HMS GrecianHMS Sphinx (as HMS CamillaOngakuka Maru, (Higaki Kaisen, It Takes A Village), Le Tigre Privateer, HMS Swan, HMS GodspeedHMS Ardent, HMS Diana, Russian brig Mercury, Elizabethan Warship Revenge, Xebec Syf'Allah, USF Confederacy, HMS Granado, USS Brig Syren

 

Posted (edited)

I did think about doing the main wale, but in the end, decided against for a couple of reasons. The first is the length of pear required, well over 800mm. The second is that it is very wide, and one piece laser cut part would have been a nightmare to glue down flat in all areas. I did think about having separate planks laser cut, but I know for some this would be a disaster, as everything would need to align perfectly around the bends, with wide gaps appearing because of the curvature of the hull - meaning these edges would need very careful bevelling in order for the gap to be very tight, and all the time hoping you haven't bevelled the upper edge away. (I did actually try this method with Sphinx when developing that kit)

 

That was my thought process, so in the end, decided with the tried and trusted planking strips, which I know all could acheive with little issue. So, it is not because I didn't want to, it's just that the standard method made more sense for such a large model.

Edited by chris watton

logo.jpg
Vanguard Models on Facebook

Posted

Post Fifty-one

Boxwood hull planking

I had in mind from the outset that the Boxwood above the wale planking would echo the ‘yellow paint generally applied to these vessels.

Not that I will be following the realistic painting scheme of the era. As a Navy Board style model I will apply a degree of artistic licence, and follow the tradition of contemporary models in using minimal paint.

This also means that I will allow the natural boxwood planking to follow the sheer rather than the deck line paint job which was the fashion of the time.

The Topsides consist of pre-cut Pearwood sheets of plain wood with added mouldings and rails. At the lower edge a rail below the channel line will cover the join between pear and Box.

DSC01424.thumb.JPG.53075bff28cf75690c4f0719ce4ecb41.JPG

1424

In its bare form the Boxwood is too pale for my liking, so I have been looking at methods to enrich it somewhat.

Application of w-o-p darkens the tone but not quite to the degree I have in mind.

DSC01427.thumb.JPG.021f114e24eb92bd5b0b26a31ff3950a.JPG

1427

Having tested various combinations on Box strip I decided on using Colron English light oak Wood dye.

DSC01428.thumb.JPG.5aec758bb855ae278d74182121a5980c.JPG

1428

Three coats have been applied by brush, immediately wiping off with a soft cloth.

A coat of w-o-p was then applied to seal the effect.

DSC01432.thumb.JPG.be5efb77210a37cfd8510e2f440d32fd.JPG

1432

DSC01433.thumb.JPG.f5565ad1807bc8ced17f95c8f721f8c2.JPG

1433

At this point the aftermost gunports have been fully cut into the wales which were then repainted.

 

Onwards…..

 

B.E.

15/07/2023

 

Posted

B.E. Your choice of stain for the boxwood looks good to my eye: the "ochre" scheme you've chosen appears spot-on.

 

There can be a wide variance of hue with the principal fruitwoods that we use for our models. Even when all the wood is cut from the same billet, there can be color variances ranging from subtle to dramatic; I typically sort planking strips into similar hues whether furnished in a kit or bashed with replacement hardwoods.

 

 

 

 

Ron

Director, Nautical Research Guild

Secretary/Newsletter Editor, Philadelphia Ship Model Society

Former Member/Secretary for the Connecticut Marine Model Society

 

Current Build: Grace & Peace (Wyoming, 6-masted Schooner)

Completed Builds: HMS GrecianHMS Sphinx (as HMS CamillaOngakuka Maru, (Higaki Kaisen, It Takes A Village), Le Tigre Privateer, HMS Swan, HMS GodspeedHMS Ardent, HMS Diana, Russian brig Mercury, Elizabethan Warship Revenge, Xebec Syf'Allah, USF Confederacy, HMS Granado, USS Brig Syren

 

Posted

Post Fifty-two

Copper

To copper or not to copper that is the question.

If to copper, is poncing around with copper tape to produce around 2500 indented plates worth saving the £150 cost of pre-formed plates or is it a worthy expense to preserve what remains of my sanity.

Is it even worth bothering with nail indents at this scale?

023.thumb.JPG.61126b9f6d28705bca9925aa81d20512.JPG

023 (2011)

I last coppered a ship back in 2011 with my Pegasus build. Once the plates were cleaned they were left to patinate naturally.

 

I was pleased with the indented Amati plates which don’t look overscale to my eye.

The Amati plates were also handed, and accommodated the overlap, without having to overlap, by having the indented perimeter nail heads on only two sides.

These are not to be confused with the much pimpled copper plates supplied by Caldercraft, as used on their Pickle kit and others. I’m amazed they continue to issue this less than convincing version.

I suspect that the specific plate sets from Vanguard originate from Amati, but these sets have the nail indentations around all sides of the individual plates.

For those who don’t wish to bother with tape, there is a saving to be had by using the Amati versions. Seven sets of handed plates (2548 in total) will cost around £95 (£13.63 per set from CMB)

The rub is getting them, they seem to be hard to find in stock at present.

DSC01410.thumb.JPG.6b48ac7786cea8a617dccdcee633cc4c.JPG

1410 (2023)

DSC01411.thumb.JPG.e3bb40c9198e38bcf92aa58c590289db.JPG

1411 (2023)

Difficult to photograph thro’ her case cover but this is the  natural oxidation effect after 12 years, not that much different over the years but pleasing enough.

 

As usual I am racked with indecision; the ‘Indy’ hull is I think good enough to leave bare, but then I quite like the look of a coppered hull, and coppering adds hours of fun to the build time, increasing the time frame before I am tempted by the next wonderment to issue forth from the Forest of Dean.

 

When in doubt do nowt;

 

Having pondered overnight I have decided to plank the gun deck which won’t preclude me from inverting the hull for plating at a later stage, should I ever make my mind up.🙄

 

B.E.

16/07/2023

 

 

Posted

It took me about 3 evening bench sessions (about 3hrs each) to make enough plates.

 

I don't think any lack of nail detail on the tape takes away from the appearance. They are so much easier to get a waterline with too as you just add the waterline mark to the tape and then score along the length before peeling away the excess. Any plates that are damaged are also a cinch to replace.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Blue Ensign said:

 

I suspect that the specific plate sets from Vanguard originate from Amati, but these sets have the nail indentations around all sides of the individual plates.

 

Hi BE.

 

I can state quite categorically that my plates do not originate from Amati. My plates were designed for Speedy originally, back in 2019 and they had completely new tools made for the photo etch process (I actually used a picture of a copper plate from the full size Victory, sized to 64th and then copied the nail patterns from that). The patterns are completely different, but are obviously the same size per plate.

 

The plates I designed for Amati were originally for the 64th Cutty Sark, and then another set were produced in 72nd for the Vanguard kit. This was in 2007. So, although I did design the Amati and VM plates, they are not the same. In fact, I decided not to design my new plates the same exact pattern in case some thought I was copying my designs from 2007.

Edited by chris watton

logo.jpg
Vanguard Models on Facebook

Posted

To copper or not to copper? I can't remember which plates I used but was fine with them. Given the perfection of your planking, Maurice, I wouldn't copper but...the final aesthetic suggests I might. I had the same, self, question with a well laid, to my eye, second layer of boxwood planking and decided to copper to learn how to do so, plus liking the look of your Pegasus. You already have learnt. That doesn't help at all does it!? Either way it'll be stunning. Me, I'd copper for the contrasts, the planking is proven, but it's not my ship...

Cheers

Alistair

 

Current Build - 

On Hold - HMS Fly by aliluke - Amati/Victory Models - 1/64

Previous Build  - Armed Virginia Sloop by Model Shipways

Previous Build - Dutch Whaler by Sergal (hull only, no log)

 

Posted

Thanks Alistair, It did cross my mind to partially plate it, and I seem to recall a contemporary model displayed that way. Can't find it for the life of me now, but I was reminded seeing the early stages of kevin's 'Indy' plating job with the plates partly running up the stem and keel posts, but left low in the centre.

 

Just a thought, but I've got a while now before the question faces me again.

 

Cheers,

 

B.E.

Posted

After coppering Pickle, I was fine with it.  After spending forever coppering HMS Vanguard and quitting modeling for three years after finishing it I vowed to never ever copper another ship ever never again. Aside from the mind blowing tediousness of it I really don’t like the look. Bit what do I know 😁

Regards,

Glenn

 

Current Build: Royal Barge, Medway Long Boat
Completed Builds: HMS Winchelsea HM Flirt (paused) HM Cutter CheerfulLady NelsonAmati HMS Vanguard,  
HMS Pegasus, Fair American, HM Granado, HM Pickle, AVS, Pride of Baltimore, Bluenose

Posted

Post Fifty-three

Planking the gundeck

For this I am using mainly 1mm x 4mm Boxwood strip provided by Hobbymill eu. Broader strips will also be required in certain areas.

DSC00492.thumb.JPG.d5fa320ad3e67ad4d2b81a42570a8c7a.JPG

0492

I have already prepped the deck by the addition of carlings beneath the hatch openings and have opened up the deck area above the Lower deck ladderway down to the Orlop.

The gundeck will otherwise be fully planked.

 

The first job is to fit the margin planks.

DSC01439.thumb.JPG.36b79cdef71b728cad919d54a59c2e60.JPG

1439

These are not too difficult on Indy; the forward section requires cutting out from 1mm Box sheet but for the greater part 6mm strip can be used with gentle edge bending.

DSC01440.thumb.JPG.6257e229acb2ff7fb677583521fed38f.JPG

1440

DSC01442.thumb.JPG.b98522f1d9a27b96c9ae9581dd1cb78a.JPG

1442

I added a couple of scarph joints just for interest and with the open and clear decks on this minimalist build, they should be visible.

DSC01452.thumb.JPG.56c694a7ab2801f7c82b80f4d43b719e.JPG

1452

DSC01450.thumb.JPG.363b40473fedf96dc2f3015c58d97bcc.JPG

1450

The part that will represent the waterway and contain the scuppers will be fitted once the Spirketting is in place.

Before I can get stuck into the main planking, I need to consider the centre line fittings.

 

These are intended to be simply glued atop the finished deck planking but I prefer to fit these in place first and plank up to them.

This will involve beefing up the depth of the coamings etc by 1mm to compensate. I also like to see a round-up to the head ledges so these will also be modified.

 

B.E.

17/07/2023

 

Posted

Post Fifty-four

 

Centre line fittings. (Part One)

These consist of the hatchways and ladderways.

They are provided in the kit complete with grating sets and attached shot garlands in pearwood.

The kit grating sets go together very nicely, and the gratings  fit neatly into place with minimum effort.

The depth of the coamings (2.8mm) equates to a height above deck of 7” which looks a tad low to my eye for a ship of this size.

DSC01465.thumb.JPG.77d26965b86c9ddf82270ac8c909b25c.JPG

1465

Looking at the Adm plan of Indy, the coamings, assuming a 1:48 scale, equate to a height of 9½” above deck. *

At 1:64 scale this equates to 3.77mm

The Lower deck coamings are much lower, as are those of the Qtr deck.

 

*By Navy Order 1795 coaming were to be built well clear of the deck, approx. 15-18” (5mm – 7mm at scale)

Goodwin (Construction and Fitting of the English Man of War)

Indy went into service around the same time as the Navy Board issued the new order.

Lavery (Arming and fitting of English ships of war) notes;

Coamings and ledges varied considerably in height, according to the size of ship and their position. They could be as high as 12” on a large ship and as small as 3” on a sloop or Brig. By the late Eighteenth century much higher coamings were fitted on the gundeck than other decks, as water was much more likely to come in thro’ the ports of that deck.

 

With all this in mind;

DSC01460.thumb.JPG.34320aa9d21a404ff00bffc417a6e4ce.JPG

1460

I have beefed up the underside of the coaming frames using a combination of 3mm x 2.5mm and 2mm x 2.5mm strips.

DSC01458.thumb.JPG.98ee6361fc8f092888eaf6288a0582b2.JPG

1458

The finished height will be tweaked once I have decided about the round-up to the head ledges.

DSC01464.thumb.JPG.c1e4593e06960cf46e4cf5184f8f3650.JPG

1464

The main problem with getting into this sort of detail is that Indy is a late age frigate conversion of which there seems to be a dearth of detailed information. Most of the contemporary large frigate models from which a visual appreciation may be gained, date from the 1770’s and earlier.

DSC01463.thumb.JPG.45d31f93e3867ae47aa4fe3c397be344.JPG

1463

The beefed-up hatches on the vast expanse of the Indy gundeck don’t look out of proportion, to my eye at least.

DSC01466.thumb.JPG.261c9ef59a4fee7bd2b9f8646417885a.JPG

1466

I next need to look at the round-up to the head ledges.

 

B.E.

19/07/2023

 

 

Posted

Post Fifty-five

 

Hatches and gratings – Part Two

Modifying the hatches was fairly straightforward on Sphinx, not quite so on 'Indy.'

On all three of the hatch/ladderway sets there are support pillars central to the head ledges; adding a round-up complicates the fitting.

Apart from any other consideration, I think a slight round-up and camber to the gratings provides a much more pleasing aspect.

Whether the coamings are high or low, a camber appeared to apply.

DSC01478.thumb.JPG.94f3d939f5d1615be86104a4b55cbfa9.JPG

1478

To create the camber, I attach strips of Boxwood atop the ledges. This is then shaped down to a feather edge where it meets the coamings.

DSC01480.thumb.JPG.e678481222ec8f7b43ec6a83afbb451a.JPG

1480

Cleaning up still required but you get the idea.

DSC01468.thumb.JPG.f71dc8d938b63d6baa042ef1ab95f97b.JPG

1468

The gratings camber was formed around a large diameter cardboard tube (4¼”)

DSC01469.thumb.JPG.3ee493f20c4d3cb54c2a3951264e541e.JPG

1469

Bit of a leap of faith this, you never know until the job is done whether the grating will fall apart having been given the water and heat treatment.

DSC01484.thumb.JPG.e56f11421fa4f7eddd224f9ae64c7c30.JPG

1484

The Main hatch was supplied with three sections of gratings. I’m pleased Chris provided this arrangement, I had to do it myself on Sphinx, and tricky little beggars they were to make.

DSC01486.thumb.JPG.252174e223bfc7a2b908cee244373072.JPG

1486

DSC01487.thumb.JPG.468724f5efa592681024a23f1f4e9159.JPG

1487

DSC01472.thumb.JPG.cb57f52b7b3e7ad40ed803f808c25eeb.JPG

1472

In my version the coamings rise 4.4mm (11”) above the deck with the Head ledges higher by 1mm.

Once fully cleaned up the coamings will be painted black and the gratings left bright.

 

 

B.E.

20/07/2023

 

 

Posted
Posted
On 7/19/2023 at 5:48 AM, Blue Ensign said:

The beefed-up hatches on the vast expanse of the Indy gundeck don’t look out of proportion, to my eye at least.

The increased height of the coamings look good. With more seawater and rain washing over the deck this makes very good sense. The gratings look nice too with the increased camber.

 

Ron

Director, Nautical Research Guild

Secretary/Newsletter Editor, Philadelphia Ship Model Society

Former Member/Secretary for the Connecticut Marine Model Society

 

Current Build: Grace & Peace (Wyoming, 6-masted Schooner)

Completed Builds: HMS GrecianHMS Sphinx (as HMS CamillaOngakuka Maru, (Higaki Kaisen, It Takes A Village), Le Tigre Privateer, HMS Swan, HMS GodspeedHMS Ardent, HMS Diana, Russian brig Mercury, Elizabethan Warship Revenge, Xebec Syf'Allah, USF Confederacy, HMS Granado, USS Brig Syren

 

Posted

Thanks for your comments and 'likes' guys 👍

 

Post Fifty-three

 

Completion of gundeck hatches.

DSC01491.thumb.JPG.9806db59acb5f5e2ec379ed36e08bba3.JPG

1491

The modified hatches are painted, and the gratings given the  w-o-p treatment.

DSC01495.thumb.JPG.30c33b0e02da61d65706486db414391b.JPG

1495

I always approach the gluing of fittings along the centre line with some anxiety. Particularly on a large length of deck  as on Indy it can be tricky to ensure that they are all in true alignment.

I spend a lot of time dry fitting the hatch sets before I commit to glue.

 

Whether you plank before or after, this same issue will be encountered.

 

Fitting the hatches before planking allows for a more accurate and interesting deck layout around the coamings, albeit a more fiddly and time-consuming approach.

DSC01493.thumb.JPG.784f0529ad40b290e2497ce0841c048e.JPG

1493

I start by fixing the mainmast partner base. On the kit this is attached to the hatchway abaft the Mainmast, (193) but I separated them. This base also has the holes to take the elmtree pumps.

 

I use small diameter round dowel to secure the base in the correct position, this will also double up as pump fixings.

As on the original these pump trunks run thro’ all decks to the bilges, pity they ain’t hollow.

 

The sets are now glued into place on the deck centre -line.

DSC01499.thumb.JPG.81144ed5030b689cf71a85ecc857b97f.JPG

1499

The hatchway aft of the Mainmast butts against the partners. This is followed by the aft ladderway set.

DSC01498.thumb.JPG.348801a0bae257eec5bbd523ea78663b.JPG

1498

The main and Fore sets follow.

DSC01502.thumb.JPG.e061e5c765a6e9749416c61b3025c631.JPG

1502

DSC01511.thumb.JPG.a3ae18463697d0c61b0e8b0e1e2b2d8c.JPG

1511

At each stage I sight along the deck and from all angles to check the run.

DSC01506.thumb.JPG.555d6b05c9370f13c4857cc6f1896c0a.JPG

1506

The run is also sighted from distance along the floor.

With this it’s not the getting down that’s the problem, it’s getting back up again, taking this behemoth with you. 🙄

DSC01508.thumb.JPG.368e21de6a77aea6c1aa165a81fb3ed1.JPG

1508

Time to move on Wills.

 

B.E.

21/07/2023

 

 

Posted

Post Fifty-four

 

Onto the deck planking

 A very wet weekend in these ‘ere parts allowed for good progress in planking the gundeck.

Before I start, I forgot to mention the Capstan step for the Upper deck, or lower Capstan.

The kit provided part (278) looked a little unusual to me, of a shape reminiscent of a toilet seat.

DSC01512.thumb.JPG.411cf9538ba2758001e110bf7fd1f691.JPG

1512

Of minor relevance if the area is to be decked over, but in my version it is likely to be unplanked.

 

I replaced the kit version with a more conventional set-up, made from Box sheet. The kit version sits atop it in this photo.

 

For the deck planking I am using 1mm Boxwood strip obtained from Hobbycraft EU. The main supply is of 4mm width but I will also be using 5mm and 6mm widths in various areas.

DSC01517.thumb.JPG.be647b27c66c6e9fdf5519fbd7ef00f0.JPG

1517

I start the job at the stern and work forward; for this first phase I am planking between and around the centre line deck fittings.

DSC01515.thumb.JPG.0f5c48ae7271eff703ba8e053ca924e8.JPG

1515

When it came to the brick base for the Gally stove I wasn’t too sure whether to plank around the base guidelines on the sub deck or fit the base atop the planking. The manual pics which used the engraved deck pattern indicates that the base is inset the deck pattern.

I decided to temporarily fit a dummy brick base, and plank around it.

 

One of the tenets or principles of deck planking is that very thin strips are undesirable, such as abutting the coamings of hatches. These would present areas of weakness subject to rot.

In these areas broader planks are required, so a range of planking widths are required. If the fittings are applied post decking then it is often a question of pot luck where the  planking lines fall.

DSC01523.thumb.JPG.8dbb465ef5d39e8267812057dd05024d.JPG

1523

DSC01529.thumb.JPG.48a78cb3e751990f7c1b5847b4573fb2.JPG

1529

The broader planks bordering the Main and Fore hatchways can be seen in the above shots.

DSC01520.thumb.JPG.e7dbc390d642474466ec0918e3c4e631.JPG

1520

I have used 4mm,5mm,and 6mm strips in completing this area.

DSC01522.thumb.JPG.28edfe83e4c5d73b4ca08c88fe0db947.JPG

1522

DSC01524.thumb.JPG.5a71c58d065123762b7c14ba729c8349.JPG

1524

DSC01525.thumb.JPG.426687d905a7a7226aa1b9f8d9887f84.JPG

1525

DSC01527.thumb.JPG.04c2592aaa16305e5425b2197d597924.JPG

1527

Once past the central section the planking tends to regularise., until at least it approaches the margin/waterway planks.

At that point there is another decision to be made.

 

B.E.

23/07/2023

 

Posted

That is a very nice start to the deck planking.

Rusty

"So Long For Now" B) 

 

Current Builds: Speedwell

 

 

Completed Build Logs:  HMS Winchelsea 1/48   Duchess of Kingston USF Confederacy , US Brig Syren , Triton Cross Section , Bomb Vessel Cross SectionCutter CheerfulQueen Anne Barge, Medway Longboat

 

Completed Build Gallery: Brig Syren , 1870 Mississippi Riverboat , 1949 Chris-Craft 19' Runabout

 

Posted

Post Fifty-five

Planking cont’d

I am now outside of the central run of planking, and from this point on I will be using 4mm planks.

I have decided on 30’ planks equating to around 140mm at scale, using a three-butt shift pattern.

 

Planking continues and the photos below show the state of play after a couple of days solid work.

DSC01536.thumb.JPG.0c6d6409d05a3b361d4a54c7a94b34d3.JPG

1536

DSC01533.thumb.JPG.ceada21f8fc4b2d64252cc86c1ab0d1a.JPG

1533

DSC01534.thumb.JPG.51781edefc33b27440f6ad8cc5561672.JPG

1534

DSC01532.thumb.JPG.e4b3d2c37267b816bbeec5da8018f7b0.JPG

1532

DSC01531.thumb.JPG.0b15e6cdae645e8d4ce8c7427240c111.JPG

1531

DSC01540.thumb.JPG.38dad712bf263feeca90e8e680f304ee.JPG

1540

I now need to decide on the form of the strakes that abut the margin plank.

 

I am aware that two strakes of Top and Butt deck planking for the outer strakes were used during this period.

Goodwin (Construction and Fitting…) makes mention of this style of planking the gundeck but indicates that most vessels were planked with parallel strakes. He adds that the practise was probably adopted towards the end of the 18thc and its purpose to resist athwartships compression when the vessel was in heavy seas.

I have no knowledge whether 'Indy' was so planked, but I suspect that with a full battery of 24 pounders on a ‘64’ hull it may have been the case.

The only visual reference source I have is Vol 11 of the TFFM for the sixth-rate sloop. The book contains drawings of Top and butt planking combined with hooded planks.

DSC01545.thumb.JPG.31e3ac57afc46864f3d9b47fa08236e0.JPG

1545

At this point I don’t have a clear idea of how to approach the fitting of t&b particularly at the curvature of the margin plank towards the bow.

DSC01546.thumb.JPG.c909c724c38bf18d1da3e2ae79ee98cd.JPG

1546

Another important issue is if I manage to cobble together a set of t&b, how will that impact on planking the remaining space.

DSC01544.thumb.JPG.bc3c30b810ffbc0ac9a615c75772a60f.JPG

1544

The simple option would be to continue the planking and joggle the planks ends into the margin. I’m tempted, but I do have a jig for t&b…..

 

I’ll take some time out and have a play around.

 

B.E.

25/07/2023

 

Posted

Post Fifty-six

That Top and Butt deck planking.

Having a jig on hand gave me the impetus to play around with Top and Butt.

DSC01553.thumb.JPG.edd315b4b37e5388eda83566038b0bb1.JPG

1553

Having cut out a stock of planks I found it useful to play around applying them to the deck in the manner of a jigsaw puzzle to help visualise of what is required, particularly at the bow and stern.

DSC01559.thumb.JPG.6809141e176abbdb49bc687da12830d6.JPG

1559

I concluded it was doable and I started at the bow.

DSC01556.thumb.JPG.0bbfc30b30bd1c2e05a70077140ba8d5.JPG

1556

At the stern I realised that some de-constructed was required to avoid running out of planking space.

DSC01562.thumb.JPG.47e11d074b4dcf4f5e406580eb78a092.JPG

1562

Removing some of the already laid planks not too troublesome with the application of water and use of a sharp micro chisel.

DSC01560.thumb.JPG.aec6290d55557f83a7b64e8ef03c0f9d.JPG

1560

Tapering of the planks as they run towards the stern, will be required, ideally with a finished butt width of not less than 3mm. Removal of further existing planks will also be involved.

DSC01564.thumb.JPG.e3c630132484620cd28940e6b9e29f2e.JPG

1564

Tick strips will be used to facilitate the tapering.

DSC01563.thumb.JPG.fb3f07ff7af740b718936fcbb132ef01.JPG

1563

DSC01557.thumb.JPG.9b797ca51eca77f059b2d99881b7393e.JPG

1557

A fair bit of extra work, but I’m fairly content with progress.

 

B.E.

27/07/2023

 

Posted

that looks brilliant

Posted

Post Fifty-six

 

…and more deck planking.

Another three days, and the Port side planking is completed.

DSC01569.thumb.JPG.54a9b14bdb456b5024b3969e6bb51475.JPG

1569

By removing a number of the existing planks  I had hoped to then infill to the top and butt without too much trouble.

In retrospect it would have been far better not to plank beyond the central belt before fitting the t&b strakes.

The result is that the available space towards the stern was insufficient to accommodate the required number of planks, without an eclectic mix of shapes and sizes. 

DSC01584.thumb.JPG.6bfee7b3b87eb03e4ff363c48f314dce.JPG

1584

As Mr Spock may say it’s planking Jim but not as we know it.

DSC01576.thumb.JPG.6ac54b701ec7853e33c19ce6bc7b633a.JPG

1576

So Guys what d’ye think. - Don’t give up the day job Boss!

 

Unfortunately this is my day job now, but on balance I decided not to rip it all up and start again, that would throw me short of planking, and I'm otherwise  ok with what will be the visible element.

DSC01570.thumb.JPG.c8dedee428e4cdbcb98f95ba537c2a6c.JPG

1570

Spot the double drop planks, necessary because of lack of planking foresight.

Annoying, but on the positive side the suspect area will be mostly hidden by the Qtr deck and aftermost 24 pounder guns.

DSC01578.thumb.JPG.c02f2b6b1d5ffe4e8ec546c5d9741f7c.JPG

1578

DSC01582.thumb.JPG.e1385ed28c53aef359a5e25969439eb8.JPG

1582

The forward end of the planking and the top and butt strakes are ok.

DSC01579.thumb.JPG.87cc597bf23fd355ab1d001d13eb00c9.JPG

1579

I generally enjoy deck planking, I find it therapeutic, but one of the downsides with 'Indy' is because of the hull size, and high bulwarks, the planking has to be done standing up.

Leaning over the hull, gives me back, neck, and shoulder ache, but it will all be worth it in the end.🤞

 

Onto the Starboard side, and more hours of fun.

 

 

B.E.

29/07/2023

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...