Jump to content

Chuck

Administrators
  • Posts

    9,096
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chuck

  1. Beautiful work...I am actually planning right now a larger version that is more detailed with floors and true framing practice.   It will be double the size and represents a 30 foot longboat.   This way the rig and details can be added without compromises for a mass produced kit.   So you will just have to build it again!!! :)

  2. Ok guys....can we get back on topic here.   Just a friendly reminder...this is what we have talked about before.  Please review the last dozen pages for build log content/ ship modeling content.  You wont find any.  Please take these conversations off list or to the shore leave section we set up especially for this kind of stuff..

     

    Thanks for understanding.

     

    Admin

    Chuck

  3. As another alternative you could try using hard maple and that is available here in sheets and strips.   Very inexpensive.  the wood is much harder than basswood and I have in fact used it for another pinnace build.   I used it for the frames and keel.   After applying wipe on poly it looks very good and very similar to boxwood.   It is not as hard as boxwood and you cant get as sharp an edge on teh wood but it is leaps and bounds better than basswood.

     

    http://www.nationalbalsa.com/category_s/232.htm

     

    Chuck

  4. Yes I know....that isnt your fault...Take a look at the plans,  It may be hard to tell on the paper plans at the actual scale but the bottoms were flattened during laser cutting.  There is a tight curve there and the tolerances in the ME laser cutting is not tight enough to keep the curve you noticed with the pinnace.  Those sharper points were just cut away.   It happens.  They were able to do so on the pinnace I suspect only because of the larger scale.  Even though a tight curve doesnt exist for the reasons mentioned,   it should be there.   When fairing the bulkheads it should probably be sanded into the frames as much as possible. To mimic the tight curve - transition of frames, use the shape shown on the plans body plan.  Depending on the consistency of their laser cutting it may be more pronounced and absent in some kits more than others.  But the kerf they get while laser cutting is just too large to keep this detail.

     

     

    Here are some images of those last three frames as they SHOULD appear and the body plan from the plans enlarged.

     

    Graphic1.jpg

  5. Bruce ...dont forget to introduce yourself properly to the forum in the appropriate area.  Let folks know who you are.   There is nothing more suspect than folks who sign up and simply post stuff for sale and then leave.    It happens a lot.   Folks here are so much more comfortable with these online transactions if you waited a few weeks and in teh meantime post about your cutrrent projects and your introduction to the hobby.

     

    Otherwise....it gets a bit scary.   

     

    Chuck

  6. Russ is correct...you can add the keel and stem and even the stern post at any time.   One thing you must remember is that every guide or log is only representing the sequences used by that individual builder.   There are so many ways to plank the hull.  I single planked the prototype also.   I would say that if you had planned on double planking you should wait to add the keel.   Otherwise it would be too short...or not deep enough.   This is why I left it off  until after planking.  The rabbet is only used for the first layer.  A second layer would sit along side the keel and make it look to narrow.

     

    So for you it wouldnt matter.

     

    Here is a photo of my finished hull with just the bottom painted.  One layer only below the wales.

     

    hulldone2bw.gif

     

    hulldone2.gif

  7. I am often asked by folks who buy my rope how they could make it look less new.   They want to know how to give it a more weathered or even just textured look like they see on many contemporary models.   First I tell them to wait 300 years and it will look just like they want it to.

     

    But then after failing to get a laugh I suggest what I have done for years.  Its quick and easy.  Its not very messy.  But it does take practice.  So I figured I would post it here.

     

    Model builders have been running their standing rigging (black or brown) through a candle flame for years.   They do this to remove the fuzz.   Luckily my rope doesnt have any fuzz.  BUT.....should you run your light tan rope through a candle flame....it will pick up some nice color.   The soot from the burning candle will give your rope some texture.   Multiple passes through the candle will make it darker.

     

    Running it through very quickly will create a very blotchy and uneven look so dont be afraid to take your time.   Take as much time to slowly run it through or over the flame.  You will have to practice because obviously if you go too slow it will just catch on fire.

     

    Once I run it through the candle flame,  I will run the rope between my fingers.  This evenly distributes and softens the texturing.   In the photo below you will see a brand new and untouched coil of rope and behind it....that was after I ran it through the candle flame twice.  If you do it once it wont be as dark but I wanted you guys to actually see the results.

     

    So if you are trying to figure out how to weather or darken the running rigging,  you might want to give this a try.  I havent tried yet....but I am also wondering if different color candles will impart a different shade of soot.....will have to try that next.  This effect came from your standard average white unscented candle.

     

    Click the thumbnail for a really big version.

     

    ropeburn copy.jpg

  8. Pops

     

    Looking good.  You are in a good position to take that cap rail and just thin it down considerably at the bow.   That extra piece you added will not be necessary at all.  Just carefully thin down the caprail to remove what I have shown below.   Then also thin down the frames in that area as well.  Dont be afraid to weaken the hull.  It will be quite sturdy.  Just thin it out.  It will make a huge difference.

     

    Chuck

     

    longboat.jpg

  9. Yes its on the plans and you could certainly have a look at those hi-res photos I posted.  They show it very clearly on the contemporary models.  Almost all of the blocks had hooks seized to them and they were placed in the holes of the iron bands.   This made it possible to un rig the boat quickly and store that stuff.  For the kit,  I only showed this a few times because it some tiny stuff.   To simplify it I simply tied the blocks to the iron bands.  But a more historically accurate method is to use hooks.

     

    Check out these photos...

     

    http://modelshipworld.com/index.php?/topic/1856-large-close-up-images-of-longboat-rigging-on-contemporary-models/

×
×
  • Create New...